Switch Theme:

Impossible Robes and Daemonic Incursion  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Monster-Slaying Daemonhunter






Dimmamar

Let's say a Lord of Change is on his very last wound and a GK unit puts a storm bolter save on him. One wound, one save of 3++. The LoC fails the save and uses the Impossible Robes ability to reroll the save, which reroll results in a 1. Per the Robes' special ability, "the wearer is immediately slain." Daemonic Incursion says, "Use this stratagem when one of your DAEMON units is destroyed by a GK unit."

Does the "immediately slain" of the Robes happen before the final wound is removed from the LoC, thereby negating the possibility of using the Incursion stratagem?

LVO 2017 - Best GK Player

The Grimdark Future 8500 1500 6000 2000 5000


"[We have] an inheritance which is beyond the reach of change and decay." 1 Peter 1.4
"With the Emperor there is no variation or shadow due to change." James 1.17
“Fear the Emperor; do not associate with those who are given to change.” Proverbs 24.21 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




.. I think it's fair to say the wound was caused by the GK unit, even if it triggered some wargear ability.

Talk about a corner case lol.

DFTT 
   
Made in gb
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain





Cardiff

Captyn_Bob wrote:
.. I think it's fair to say the wound was caused by the GK unit, even if it triggered some wargear ability.

Talk about a corner case lol.


Agreed.

 Stormonu wrote:
For me, the joy is in putting some good-looking models on the board and playing out a fantasy battle - not arguing over the poorly-made rules of some 3rd party who neither has any power over my play nor will be visiting me (and my opponent) to ensure we are "playing by the rules"
 
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






Slain and Destroyed are synonymous. Flees is not.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/01/18 18:47:50


 
   
Made in ca
Regular Dakkanaut





Alternatively, why would a Lord of Change trigger the impossible robe death clause at all? He add 1 to any inv. saving throw, meaning rolling a 1 is impossible in the first place as it becomes a 2.
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






VoidSempai wrote:
Alternatively, why would a Lord of Change trigger the impossible robe death clause at all? He add 1 to any inv. saving throw, meaning rolling a 1 is impossible in the first place as it becomes a 2.
A 1 always fails for To Hit, To Wound and To Save rolls, regardless of modifiers. Page 181 BRB.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/01/18 18:49:55


 
   
Made in ca
Regular Dakkanaut





 BaconCatBug wrote:
VoidSempai wrote:
Alternatively, why would a Lord of Change trigger the impossible robe death clause at all? He add 1 to any inv. saving throw, meaning rolling a 1 is impossible in the first place as it becomes a 2.
A 1 always fails for To Hit, To Wound and To Save rolls, regardless of modifiers. Page 181 BRB.


I know, but the impossible robe says that '' On a roll of 1, the bearer is immediatly slain''. But Ephemeral form add 1 to any saving throw. Even if a 1 is rolled and is a failed, it never actually triggers the impossible robes because it checks the trigger after modificator.
The impossible robe death clause basically only matters if you give it to a CSM Daemon prince, or if you can remove Inv. saves such as with death hex.
   
Made in gb
Norn Queen






VoidSempai wrote:
 BaconCatBug wrote:
VoidSempai wrote:
Alternatively, why would a Lord of Change trigger the impossible robe death clause at all? He add 1 to any inv. saving throw, meaning rolling a 1 is impossible in the first place as it becomes a 2.
A 1 always fails for To Hit, To Wound and To Save rolls, regardless of modifiers. Page 181 BRB.


I know, but the impossible robe says that '' On a roll of 1, the bearer is immediatly slain''. But Ephemeral form add 1 to any saving throw. Even if a 1 is rolled and is a failed, it never actually triggers the impossible robes because it checks the trigger after modificator.
The impossible robe death clause basically only matters if you give it to a CSM Daemon prince, or if you can remove Inv. saves such as with death hex.
Ah, I see. Yes, that is a very good point!
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




Hmmm it should really say natural one, huh.
One for the faq.

DFTT 
   
Made in us
Monster-Slaying Daemonhunter






Dimmamar

Op addressed in the new FAQ. Maybe GW reads Dakka??

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/01/22 16:09:48


LVO 2017 - Best GK Player

The Grimdark Future 8500 1500 6000 2000 5000


"[We have] an inheritance which is beyond the reach of change and decay." 1 Peter 1.4
"With the Emperor there is no variation or shadow due to change." James 1.17
“Fear the Emperor; do not associate with those who are given to change.” Proverbs 24.21 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




 Elric Greywolf wrote:
Op addressed in the new FAQ. Maybe GW reads Dakka??


Sometimes I hope not.

But hopefully people keep emailing sensible questions to their faq inbox.

Now if only FW could do the same.

DFTT 
   
Made in nz
Regular Dakkanaut




FAQ came out and answered this:

Q: If a Grey Knights unit deals the final wound on a Daemon
equipped with the Impossible Robe, the player uses the
Robe to re-roll the failed save, and the result is a 1 (meaning
the Daemon is immediately slain), does the Daemon count as
being slain by a Grey Knight unit for purposes of using the
Daemonic Incursion Stratagem?

A: Yes.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: