Author |
Message |
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
|
2018/05/01 12:47:51
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Hello,
To counter-balance the nerf to deepstrike turn 1, the deployment distance to enemy units should be reduced from 9 to 6, since the whole point of that distance was to reduce the effects of deepstrike, since a failed charge meant troubles.
Now that a whole turn is lost, i think it would be completely unfairt that on top of only being able to deepstrike turn 1, you would miserably fail your charge and be useless (or dead) for one more turn.
Gunline lovers don't need to participate in this thread btw.
What do you think ?
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/05/01 12:48:18
|
|
|
|
2018/05/01 14:18:29
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
Nope.
No deepstrike (regardless of when) should be a nearly guaranteed charge.
|
|
|
|
2018/05/01 17:14:54
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Yeah because rolling 6 inchs on 3d6 will be so challenging.
For the love of god atleast let the meta post faq shake out before complaining that stuff doesn't work.
The FAQ through some.big changes into the game players will take time to adjust, untill that has happened who knows whats needed.
|
|
|
|
2018/05/01 17:32:27
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Potent Possessed Daemonvessel
Why Aye Ya Canny Dakkanaughts!
|
Honestly, I wouldn't mind if the old form of deep strike came back:
- Roll 2d6+scatter dice
- On a mishap (landing on terrain or enemy models) roll a d6 and consult a table:
1 - unit is destroyed
2-3 - unit is held in reserve
4-5 - unit lands in the closest space that is more than 1" away from the enemy unit or building + the unit takes d6 mortal wounds as well as a further d6 mortal wounds per 5 models in the unit
6 - unit lands in the closest space that is more than 1" away from the enemy unit or building + if it would have landed on an enemy unit, that enemy unit takes d3 mortal wounds as well as a further d3 mortal wounds per 5 models in the unit
Personally I think that would make for more daring tactics.
|
Ghorros wrote:The moral of the story: Don't park your Imperial Knight in a field of Gretchin carrying power tools.
Marmatag wrote:All the while, my opponent is furious, throwing his codex on the floor, trying to slash his wrists with safety scissors. |
|
|
|
2018/05/01 17:43:09
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Terminator with Assault Cannon
|
mrhappyface wrote:Honestly, I wouldn't mind if the old form of deep strike came back:
- Roll 2d6+scatter dice
- On a mishap (landing on terrain or enemy models) roll a d6 and consult a table:
1 - unit is destroyed
2-3 - unit is held in reserve
4-5 - unit lands in the closest space that is more than 1" away from the enemy unit or building + the unit takes d6 mortal wounds as well as a further d6 mortal wounds per 5 models in the unit
6 - unit lands in the closest space that is more than 1" away from the enemy unit or building + if it would have landed on an enemy unit, that enemy unit takes d3 mortal wounds as well as a further d3 mortal wounds per 5 models in the unit
Personally I think that would make for more daring tactics.
How about a return to the other old rule: The 543 rule? First round Reserves come in on a 5+, Second on a 4+, Third on a 3+. Limits some of the First Round Alpha stuff without a complete nerf.
|
Of all the races of the universe the Squats have the longest memories and the shortest tempers. They are uncouth, unpredictably violent, and frequently drunk. Overall, I'm glad they're on our side!
Office of Naval Intelligence Research discovers 3 out of 4 sailors make up 75% of U.S. Navy.
"Madness is like gravity... All you need is a little push."
:Nilla Marines: 2500
:Marine "Scouts": 2500 (Systemically Quarantined, Unsupported, Abhuman, Truncated Soldiers)
"On one side of me stand my Homeworld, Stronghold and Brotherhood; On the other, my ancestors. I cannot behave otherwise than honorably."
|
|
|
|
2018/05/14 07:23:09
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I figured it would be better as follows.
1st turn, more than 12"
2nd turn, more than 9"
3rd turn, more than 6"
|
|
|
|
2018/05/15 16:10:30
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Norn Queen
|
Zustiur wrote:I figured it would be better as follows.
1st turn, more than 12"
2nd turn, more than 9"
3rd turn, more than 6"
I like this. It fixes almost all the Plasma Bomb units (since they lose Rapid Fire) and mitigates T1 Charges but allows it later on.
|
|
|
|
2018/05/15 19:31:51
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Nurgle Chosen Marine on a Palanquin
|
Zustiur wrote:I figured it would be better as follows.
1st turn, more than 12"
2nd turn, more than 9"
3rd turn, more than 6"
Locally we have been playing something similar in apoc games.
T1: 9
T2: 6
T3: 3
We learned pretty quickly that after T1, 9" is far too big for deep strikes to ever make it on the table.
As for the deep strike hit, I would rather see a negative to WS/ BS on the turn you arrive than having the turn delay.
|
|
|
|
|
2018/05/15 19:49:26
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Pyro Pilot of a Triach Stalker
Somewhere over the rainbow, way up high
|
I actually like 9 inches, however, the arrival of units should go back to arriving randomly. 4+, 3+, Guarenteed.
I don't mind removing scatter.
|
Bedouin Dynasty: 10000 pts
The Silver Lances: 4000 pts
The Custodes Winter Watch 4000 pts
MajorStoffer wrote:
...
Sternguard though, those guys are all about kicking ass. They'd chew bubble gum as well, but bubble gum is heretical. Only tau chew gum. |
|
|
|
2018/05/16 02:36:08
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Zustiur wrote:I figured it would be better as follows.
1st turn, more than 12"
2nd turn, more than 9"
3rd turn, more than 6"
I could definitely get behind this. Also I’d be happy never having to deal with scatter dice again. They caused more arguments than they were worth.
|
|
|
|
2018/05/31 22:24:39
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
helgrenze wrote: mrhappyface wrote:Honestly, I wouldn't mind if the old form of deep strike came back:
- Roll 2d6+scatter dice
- On a mishap (landing on terrain or enemy models) roll a d6 and consult a table:
1 - unit is destroyed
2-3 - unit is held in reserve
4-5 - unit lands in the closest space that is more than 1" away from the enemy unit or building + the unit takes d6 mortal wounds as well as a further d6 mortal wounds per 5 models in the unit
6 - unit lands in the closest space that is more than 1" away from the enemy unit or building + if it would have landed on an enemy unit, that enemy unit takes d3 mortal wounds as well as a further d3 mortal wounds per 5 models in the unit
Personally I think that would make for more daring tactics.
How about a return to the other old rule: The 543 rule? First round Reserves come in on a 5+, Second on a 4+, Third on a 3+. Limits some of the First Round Alpha stuff without a complete nerf.
This
|
|
|
|
2018/05/31 22:25:56
Subject: Reserve turn 2 deployment distance change
|
|
Norn Queen
|
iGuy91 wrote:I actually like 9 inches, however, the arrival of units should go back to arriving randomly. 4+, 3+, Guarenteed. I don't mind removing scatter.
No, the entire reasoning behind the 9" is rule is to counteract the fact reserves isn't random anymore. If you re-introduce random reserves, you need to remove the distance or reduce it. Random Reserves also screws over Characters + bodyguard in 8th, another reason why they removed the randomness.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2018/05/31 22:27:08
|
|
|
|
|