Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

https://www.facebook.com/1575682476085719/posts/2182918052028822/

It’s time to talk about Militarum Tempestus and Advisors and Auxillia again.

The 40K Facebook page agrees. Though not official, in tenet 2 of the tenets of YMDC, I figure that it could be reasonable to put this here.

I’ve asked the page if this is an official ruling from the rules team and am waiting for a response. Perhaps if more people insisted on knowing, we might get an answer.

Yeah, the rule is quite clear. 'Advisors and Auxilia' apply to the Tempestus detachments just fine. It is just that certain people here want to intentionally and blatantly misunderstand the rules.

 Crimson wrote:
Yeah, the rule is quite clear. 'Advisors and Auxilia' apply to the Tempestus detachments just fine. It is just that certain people here want to intentionally and blatantly misunderstand the rules.

As much as I’d like to agree, the wording of the Militarum Tempestus rule isn’t the best. It states all the units have to be MT, and it does not refer to exceptions like the Regimental Doctrines rule did. But, Advisors and Auxillia comes after, and could be assumed to just override that. It’s pretty bad and needs an official FAQ. Feth, the wording doesn’t need to be changed, it just needs to be answered at the end in the General Questions section.