Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/31 19:00:52
Subject: Fight first or "fight first"?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Had a game of 40k after a while with a friend, and a rule came up that I did not understand too well which had a considerable impact on the game.
I barely play with melee lists, but make up with one for this game to have fun, and included a librarian with with the Veil of Time physic power, which allows the affected unit to fight first in melee.
Now, I understood that as " this unit fights first", but during the game my opponent told me that "fight first" is a category within the melee sequence, not a description of when the unit can fight.
Therefore, the order would be:
- First charging unit
- Opponents' Counter offensive stratagem unit (if used)
- "Fight first" units (opponents' and then own)
- Charging units
- Opponents' units
- Own units
- "Fight last" units (opponents' and then own)
Is this correct? We played the game with following this order, but obviously that had a considerable impact on the strategy. As I understood it, fight first went on top of everything else (opponent's and then own), which changes the exchanges noticeable, making this physic power fight first rule vary on usability.
|
Serve the Emperor today, for tomorrow you may be be dead.
Painting blog:
https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/793314.page
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/31 19:10:27
Subject: Fight first or "fight first"?
|
 |
Moustache-twirling Princeps
|
IIRC there's an FAQ that clarifies the sequencing
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/31 19:10:31
Subject: Re:Fight first or "fight first"?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
This is covered in the FAQ and errata:
https://www.warhammer-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/lKo58OjfYV7Ysecp.pdf
*Pages 361-362 – Rare Rules, Always Fight First/Last
Add the following paragraphs to the end of this Rare Rules entry: ‘Note that it doesn’t matter how many rules are affecting a unit that enable it to fight first, or how many rules are affecting it that say it cannot be selected to fight until after all other units have done so – if a unit is under the effects of one or more of both kinds of ability simultaneously, that unit instead fights as if none of those rules are affecting it.
Note that the Counter-offensive Stratagem requires you to select a unit that is eligible to fight. This means that if a unit is under the effects of a rule that says that it is not eligible to fight until after all other eligible units have done so, then unless that unit is also under the effects of a rule that lets it fight first, you will not be able to select that unit to use the Counter-offensive Stratagem.
Some examples of rules that always allow a unit to strike first include Martial Superiority and Veil of Time (see Codex: Space Marines), Precognitive Strike (see Codex: Necrons), etc. Also note, as per the core rules, that units that have charged fight first in the Fight phase, and for the purposes of this Rare Rule this is considered to be a rule that lets a unit always strike first.
Some examples of rules that always make a unit strike last (or say a unit cannot be selected to fight until after all other eligible units have done so) include Tempormortis (see Codex: Space Marines), The Armour of Russ (see Codex Supplement: Space Wolves), Obeisance Generators (see Codex: Necrons), etc.’
https://www.warhammer-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/OQ1TeUZ6hxw5jp1e.pdf
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/31 19:47:23
Subject: Re:Fight first or "fight first"?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Thanks for the response
It is a bit confusing, since the player selecting unit first is different in "fight first" and "fights normaly", but seems clear in this section:
And
|
Serve the Emperor today, for tomorrow you may be be dead.
Painting blog:
https://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/793314.page
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2021/12/31 20:05:52
Subject: Fight first or "fight first"?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
That pretty much covers it.
Just bear in mind that a you can’t use the counter offensive strategem on a “fights last” unit.
|
|
 |
 |
|
|