Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I understand the reason not to sacrifice a daemonkin and I understand perhaps to a degree sacrificing a stronger unit would provide more power, but I do not think that Marines and terminators would be willing to be sacrificed. It also makes far more sense that cultists would be used for Sacrifice.

My suggestion would be as follows. 1d3 wounds would still be 1-3 cultists but they provide only a +1 to the die roll. Whereas the others provide +2 to the die roll. This would allow more leeway on how to play it, how to use it. I can see a squad of cultists being used surrounding the MoP being sacrificed for power to strengthen the spells.

Suggestion to make it better appreciated

I haven't picked up any of the 9e chaos books. Can you elaborate on how this works and what the implications of your proposed change are?

Master of Possession can within 6” cause 1d3 wounds to a non daemonkin or non cultists to get a +2 to a Malefic power cast. This can be done each time you cast a Malefic power.

OP is correct. Not being able to use it on Cultists is fething stupid. +1 to cast doing it to Cultists is perfectly reasonable.