Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/14 13:29:00
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Request: legal or not?
Command squad (follows captain on bike):
5x Veterans. (apothecary)
5x bike / 5x stormshield / 5x plasmapistol / 5x pair of LC / 5x meltabombs / 1x standard-bearer.
 or  ?
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/14 13:56:11
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Land Raider Pilot on Cruise Control
Australia
|
Not quite. They can't take pairs of LC. They are stuck with 1 only.
Otherwise, it's fine.
|
109/20/22 w/d/l
Tournament: 25/5/5 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/14 14:19:47
Subject: Re:5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Is it not => "every veteran can replace his chainsword and/or boltpistol" => replace chainsword with the following: lightning-claw xx points pair of lightning-claw double-xx points and "every veteran can replace his boltpistol with a plasmapistol" => replace boltpistol with plasmapistol
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/09/14 14:20:42
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/14 14:25:44
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Maddening Mutant Boss of Chaos
|
They can take a pair if you don't take a plasma pistol, but since you won't get +1 A for dual LCs anyway because of the Storm Shield. You're best off with Shield/PPistol/LC. Also, RAW question: Can the Apothecary take any upgrades honestly? It reads "Any Veteran can.." but does it say the Apothecary is technically also a Veteran? But it stands to reason that just like you can't further upgrade a Company Champion after buying him, you can't ugrade a Apothecary. Thoughts? Edit @ 1hadhq: Reading it (in the English dex) you replace CS/BP for a LC @ X pts. Which means you can replace the CS for LC @ X, then the BP for another LC @ X. (Thus the XX cost) But following that, you can replace your BP for a PP @ Y points. Unfortunately, you cannot replace your BP for a PP because you already replaced it with a second LC. Understand? (And yes I've heard your german dex reads differently so I am just trying to explain how the RAW are in the english dex)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/09/14 14:31:56
Renegade Guardsmen |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/14 15:19:31
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
[DCM]
.
|
So, following that (not easy), what would a pair of lightning claws cost them then?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/14 15:27:34
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Smashotron wrote:They can take a pair if you don't take a plasma pistol, but since you won't get +1 A for dual LCs anyway because of the Storm Shield. You're best off with Shield/PPistol/LC.
Also, RAW question: Can the Apothecary take any upgrades honestly? It reads "Any Veteran can.." but does it say the Apothecary is technically also a Veteran? But it stands to reason that just like you can't further upgrade a Company Champion after buying him, you can't ugrade a Apothecary. Thoughts?
Variant german: apothecary has his gear in the basic equipment in (...)plus the same as the veterans.
Thought:
A) he can take options like the vets because he is no upgraded veteran with restricted options like the company champ.
B)a veteran can be upgraded to standard-bearer but there is no mention to restrict his options,so if one vet can have a standart plus options( one hand needed for his job),the apothecary may also take options (equipment is one-handed,maybe integrated).
Edit @ 1hadhq: Reading it (in the English dex) you replace CS/BP for a LC @ X pts. Which means you can replace the CS for LC @ X, then the BP for another LC @ X. (Thus the XX cost) But following that, you can replace your BP for a PP @ Y points. Unfortunately, you cannot replace your BP for a PP because you already replaced it with a second LC. Understand? (And yes I've heard your german dex reads differently so I am just trying to explain how the RAW are in the english dex)
Variant German:
option=standartbearer.
option=company champ.
option=bikes
weapon opt. all vets=> mode : and/or =>
stormbolter,flamer,meltagun,plasmagun,all 3types of combibolter,powersword,lightningclaw,thunderhammer,PAIR of lightningclaws.
weapon opt.all vets = boltpistol => plasmapistol
option all vets= meltabombs,stormshield
we don't need to take 1x Lc and 1x Lc .
Questionable:
replace1x one-handed weapon with 1xone-handed weapon and replace 2x one-handed weapon with 1x two-handed weapon?
This is sadly not stated at page 128.
 I'm asking here for your english version to know if the weapon-options are different
Our (german dex) explanation on page 128 is a little foggy :S
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/14 15:30:05
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Alpharius wrote:So, following that (not easy), what would a pair of lightning claws cost them then?
points for a pair of LC = thunderhammer
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/14 22:34:19
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Maddening Mutant Boss of Chaos
|
Here's our entry:
link to copyrighted information removed --yakface
In the English dex, one Veteran can "carry the Company Standard" which implies he is still also privileged to other Veteran upgrades because it didn't replace anything.
The Company Champion is an upgrade which implies, IMO, that he receives a power weapon and combat shield in addition to his gear, but can take no further upgrades because he stops counting as a "Veteran".
The Apothecary, from the start, is listed as an Apothecary. All the upgrades are for "Veterans" so I read it as the only upgrade you can give an Apothecary is a bike; when it reads "The entire squad may ride Space Marine bikes for X pts."
I'm not sure what's right. That's just my interpretation.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2008/09/16 13:40:34
Renegade Guardsmen |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/14 23:23:38
Subject: Re:5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
@Smashotron:
The command-squad is exactly the same as in my german codex
One exception: after -powerfist we get - pair of lighning claws followed by -thunderhammer.
Don't know why we have one entry more than you. :S
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/14 23:31:55
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Maddening Mutant Boss of Chaos
|
Then by RAW you are correct, but it isn't RAI and I doubt any opponent would let you play with dual LCs and a PP.
BUT, like my original post, you shouldn't worry about buying the second LC because (based on the Storm Shield rules) you won't get +1 A anyway. Save yourself 75 points, and just buy 1 LC, a PP and a Shield. That's my plan, or I was thinking of 4(or 5?) meltaguns on bike.
|
Renegade Guardsmen |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/15 22:49:24
Subject: Re:5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
RAI for command-squad may have been to allow 2xLC on veterans in vehicles or at foot.
I believe the options were split up to allow to replace 2-handed weapons with 2-handed weapons.
Plus allow to replace boltpistol with plasmapistol.
Plus allow to get a stormshield.
Maybe the option should be written like:
replace chainsword with: followed by one-handed CCW's.
replace boltpistol with: followed by plasmapistol.
replace chainsword and boltpistol with: followed by 2-handed weapons or pairs of 1-handed weapons.
buy a stormshield.
less confusing and needs the same space on the page.
@Smashotron: good idea to field 4x special weapons with bikes.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/16 00:24:14
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Not really sure why youd want to do it anyway though, I know this is a rules forum but you're talking about 435(just quick math) for a unit of 5 bikers with 3+ saves. nearly 90 pts a model, for S5 T5 and A3(or 4 not sure if bikes add an attack) its just not worth it, especially because you cant consolidate into combat, I just dont think they stack up well against other elite type units, and almost 450 pts for a 5 man non scoring unit is alot. Even if they do have a 3+ invul save and T5.
|
5th Ed Tourney rec.
Ard Boyz - SOB 2-1 4th place
SM Spearhead Tourney - SOB 1-1-1 4th place
1750 RT - Space Marines 3-0 first place |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/16 03:22:08
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
If the german codex is written as you said with
"can replace bolt pistol and/or chainsword with:...
...2 Lightning Claws"
Then you could in theory replace your chainsword with 2 lightning claws, your bolt pistol with a plasma pistol and additionally take a storm shield.
Under the english dex this would not be valid.
But, as people have said it's fairly pointless to do with a storm shield because under the wargear section it says "a model equipped with a storm shield can never claim the +1 attack bonus for being armed with 2 close combat weapons in an assault". You can't forgoe the inv save in close combat in exchange for using your second weapon or anything similar, you allways must use the storm shield if you have it effectively.
Although it's worth noting that this discrepency means under the english codex a model could not take 2 lightning claws and retain any form of pistol while 1had's german codex allows it.
Regarding the apothecaries taking the wargear upgrades, At first I thought it was just silly pedantics but looking back at it now I'm not so sure. It would have been easy enough to not give the apothecary his own stat line and just say "one veteran in the squad is an apothecary and is additionally equipped with a narthecium". RAW he doesn't appear to ever be a veteran though
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/16 13:26:47
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout
|
Drunkspleen wrote:If the german codex is written as you said with
"can replace bolt pistol and/or chainsword with:...
...2 Lightning Claws"
Then you could in theory replace your chainsword with 2 lightning claws, your bolt pistol with a plasma pistol and additionally take a storm shield.
Under the english dex this would not be valid.
But, as people have said it's fairly pointless to do with a storm shield because under the wargear section it says "a model equipped with a storm shield can never claim the +1 attack bonus for being armed with 2 close combat weapons in an assault". You can't forgoe the inv save in close combat in exchange for using your second weapon or anything similar, you allways must use the storm shield if you have it effectively.
Although it's worth noting that this discrepency means under the english codex a model could not take 2 lightning claws and retain any form of pistol while 1had's german codex allows it.
Regarding the apothecaries taking the wargear upgrades, At first I thought it was just silly pedantics but looking back at it now I'm not so sure. It would have been easy enough to not give the apothecary his own stat line and just say "one veteran in the squad is an apothecary and is additionally equipped with a narthecium". RAW he doesn't appear to ever be a veteran though
Take a look at the assault squad (english codex), the sergeant there may also swap his pistol and/or sword with a pair of lightning claws.
|
In one game turn an Imperial guardsman can move 6", kill a few guys with his flamer, assault 6", kill two more guys with his bayonet, flee 12", regroup when assaulted, react 6", kill one more guy with his bayonet and then flee another 12".
So in one game turn an Imperial guardsman can move 42" and kill more than 5 people. At the same time a Chimera at top speed on a road can move 18"... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/16 22:02:13
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Webbe wrote:
Take a look at the assault squad (english codex), the sergeant there may also swap his pistol and/or sword with a pair of lightning claws.
Which he cannot in a german dex.
Should this be a spread the option for a pair of LC over units and languages joke by GW ?
Germany = command squad marines > Pair of LC
UK,US =assault squad-Sgt > Pair of LC
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/16 22:18:59
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
|
What benefit would you even get with a pair of LC vs 1 LC and PP?
|
Please note - terms like 'always/never' are carried with the basic understanding that there are exceptions to the rule, and therefore are used to mean generally...
"I do not play people who blatently exploit the rules to their own benefit, in any game. It is disrespectful to the game designers and other players." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/16 23:31:16
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Ork-Hunting Inquisitorial Xenokiller
|
2 LC = Extra Attack in CC. 1 PP and 1 LC means you can shoot.
|
Quote: Gwar - What Inquisitor said.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/16 23:35:53
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Harkainos wrote:What benefit would you even get with a pair of LC vs 1 LC and PP?
The benefit of the actual rules.
Every2nd weapon used in HtH gives a +1 attack.
Except LC ,thunderhammer,powerfist.These 3 must be used as pair to grant a 2nd attack.
Rulebook page 42.
LC + PP would be statline number of attacks. LC+ LC would be statline +1 attack.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/16 23:36:36
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Maddening Mutant Boss of Chaos
|
Both get to re-roll wounds. And in the case of the OP, there is no benefit to 2LC, 1 PP, SS because the SS denies the 2LCs' their +1A.
|
Renegade Guardsmen |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/16 23:52:43
Subject: Re:5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Thats a fact to make these selection of weapons not really good but legal.
The model would need LCs to wear and a pistol holstered and a stormshield strapped to his armor.Looks weird.
But> if the wargear is bought as supposed by some,this marine could also get 2x options for his basic chainsword+boltpistol.
RAW could lead to 2x plasmagun or 4x LC .+ the option of a stormshield. He may look like a overburdened ork then.
My intention is to find out if the and/or in the options is reliable or not.
I know already that GW missed to write the termies invul/save into the German codex.
Now they say it gets fixed with errata. After some calls and e/mails.
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/17 01:49:13
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Maddening Mutant Boss of Chaos
|
Dual plasma guns would look hilarious but serve to game purpose, and unfortunately he wouldn't have a spare hand to protect his face.
|
Renegade Guardsmen |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/17 02:59:11
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
the and/or option is fine, although I don't think they should have ever listed 2 weapons together in that list.
It's just a list that you get to make a decision from once per weapon, I don't get why you are so confused about how it works?
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/17 03:06:26
Subject: 5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Maddening Mutant Boss of Chaos
|
I think we all understand the RAI, but it's how it has been written that could lead to awkward abuse. Technically an abusive gamer could claim +1 A and re-rollable wounds for having 2 LC and 1 PP, which isn't feasible IMO at least not if the player plans on shooting the pistol.
|
Renegade Guardsmen |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2008/09/17 23:33:50
Subject: Re:5th ed SM command-squad
|
 |
Wrathful Warlord Titan Commander
|
Reason to be confused?
Maybe a weapon list that has 2handed and 1handed weapons in it.This allows me to take i.e.:
2x stormbolter=>will I get now twice the shots of a single stormbolter each turn?
2x pair of LC.=> why should i want pairs of LC plus another weapon? to switch and shoot perhaps?
And 4 LC are mutant only and should not be in Codex loyalists.
1x meltagun and 1x flamer => maybe fine to switch and use only one a time.
2x relic blade => this means 4 hands to use? I hope WYSIWYG protects us.
command squads with extra stormshield => 2xCCW + 1x stormshield. Why is the Stormshield not integrated in "and/or" ?
No models for 2x ......? from GW?
|
Target locked,ready to fire
In dedicatio imperatum ultra articulo mortis.
H.B.M.C :
We were wrong. It's not the 40k End Times. It's the Trademarkening.
|
|
 |
 |
|