Signatures

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Nurglitch**

Agreed. Plus it seems churlish to ignore other people's signatures while flaunting my own.

**Just Tony**

Have them on, no reason to disable them.

Though that would explain why I haven't gotten a sausage in regards to my dice comment in mine...

**CodeKantorBlue**

I did not realise it was an option. Now that I do I have disabled it.

No disrespect intended to the various posters who use signatures, but when I'm reading a long thread seeing the same signature over and over becomes tedious.

**Nurglitch**

I have them enabled. There's some handy stuff in there.

**ccs**

Excommunicatus wrote:
So, I searched the forum and while there were some results, none were on point and all were ten years old, or nearly so.

How many of you do NOT have signatures disabled in your settings?

I spend way too much time fiddling with my signature and trying to advertise my (terrible) threads... but I have everybody else's signature disabled.

If everyone has signatures disabled, why am I bothering with mine?

So.... As you're ignoring us, please justify why we should pay attention to YOU.

**ArbitorIan**

Disabled. Too many massive banners and huge blocks of text.

**MDSW**

I do not mind a line or two (guilty...), but more than three lines and any images is a bit much. I have them enabled, anyway.

**Rybrook**

I chose no, they don't bother me on the PC but I have them off on mobile devices so pages load faster

**Excommunicatus**

ccs wrote:
Excommunicatus wrote:
So, I searched the forum and while there were some results, none were on point and all were ten years old, or nearly so.

How many of you do NOT have signatures disabled in your settings?

I spend way too much time fiddling with my signature and trying to advertise my (terrible) threads... but I have everybody else's signature disabled.

If everyone has signatures disabled, why am I bothering with mine?

So.... As you're ignoring us, please justify why we should pay attention to YOU.

I have mentioned previously that I've had sigs enabled since I opened the thread, that I realized it was hypocritical to obsess over mine and ignore others and that everybody is free to choose their own stance and ignore my sig if they wish.

I even made a joke about pooh-poohs, which amused me greatly if nobody else.

**Orlanth**

ArbitorIan wrote:
Disabled. Too many massive banners and huge blocks of text.

If you turned them back on you would notice that is not true.

**thegreatchimp**

Didn't even know it was an option. I'll leave them on in any case. A fair few are "in jokes" that go over my head, but others can be quite amusing.

**Shadow Walker**

AdmiralHalsey wrote:
Didn't even know they could be disabled.

Same. I will now disable them just to see how it looks without them

**Hairesy**

I leave them enabled, makes it easier to decide who to ignore when they posit ridiculous political stances.

**Just Tony**

Hairesy wrote:
I leave them enabled, makes it easier to decide who to ignore when they posit ridiculous political stances.

Aren't they all ridiculous to an extent?

**Hairesy**

Removed - rule #1