Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 13:27:26
Subject: Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 13:47:39
Subject: Re:Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Hacking Proxy Mk.1
|
Much better imo.
I may just have to steal this
I been looking to do something similar but the rhino hatch on top never occurred to me
|
Fafnir wrote:Oh, I certainly vote with my dollar, but the problem is that that is not enough. The problem with the 'vote with your dollar' response is that it doesn't take into account why we're not buying the product. I want to enjoy 40k enough to buy back in. It was my introduction to traditional games, and there was a time when I enjoyed it very much. I want to buy 40k, but Gamesworkshop is doing their very best to push me away, and simply not buying their product won't tell them that. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 14:51:57
Subject: Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Posts with Authority
South Carolina (upstate) USA
|
I like it. Along with the top pieces I dont care for the side sponsons either.
|
Whats my game?
Warmachine (Cygnar)
10/15mm mecha
Song of Blades & Heroes
Blackwater Gulch
X wing
Open to other games too
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 14:54:04
Subject: Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Now the set actually looks good. The SR's main flaw seems to be that igor hump on it's back. Where are you gonna put the weapons though?
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 20:49:58
Subject: Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
MechaEmperor7000 wrote:Now the set actually looks good. The SR's main flaw seems to be that igor hump on it's back. Where are you gonna put the weapons though?
They're already mounted. The twin linked lascannon is the double mount next to the assault ramp, similar to a Valk/Vendetta weapon setup. The typhoon launcher is in the nose instead of the multimelta.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 21:20:08
Subject: Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Slippery Scout Biker
|
Well its great but now you have to deal with that when you are landed you will have no turret weapons to use and your laz cannons are fixed and when the Storm raven is landed you can only in a strait line. Mark my words in tourny play people will make sure you are not a single degree off.
I have no idea what army you are using this for but IMO you just nerfed your fire power.
IMO it does not make it look better at all And to top it off you are down atleast 180 degrees of firing arc and
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/02/14 21:22:53
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 21:25:53
Subject: Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Massive Knarloc Rider
|
I never disliked the hawk, so I'm not seeing why people hate it so much, but I do see that this is a pretty nice conversion! Makes it look not too dissimilar to a valkyrie with the lascannon nose mount, and the removal of the quite frankly awesome turret (Each to his own) doesn't bother me, as it makes the ship seem more streamlined.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/14 21:28:33
Subject: Re:Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
|
I do think it looks much better this way, though the above is right, but you can always say it's still turret mounted rules-wise
|
''compromise is surrender''
read my imperial guard blog:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/370393.page |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/15 02:39:24
Subject: Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Stalwart Dark Angels Space Marine
Macomb, MI
|
I like it much better- but the sidemount lascannons doesn't work for me. If i get one I will stretch the tail back an inch or so and then try to build a very streamlined mini turret for top mounted weapons. I like the way yours looks a lot better than stock! But i do think it needs a top turret
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/15 03:22:43
Subject: Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
If the turret thing is going to be a big issue, maybe glue it to the underside of the Raven? Seems to make more sense that way as the Storm Raven is a gunship, so it should be shooting downwards instead of upwards.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/15 04:56:55
Subject: Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
I'm not too concerned about how people will react to it in a tournament as I don't play in any. I don't think it'll be a problem in pickup games as the only thing I'm doing is possibly nerfing myself, lol.
And Mecha, I didn't want the big turret on the bottom as it would cause the same design issues I have with it on top. I like the turret itself and will probably use it and future ones for Razorbacks. I just don't like it on the Stormraven, it makes it look too tall. If it was a little further back on the fuselage or lower profile it wouldn't bother me, it just looks too awkward where it's placed.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/15 06:21:06
Subject: Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Nice conversion.
I keep wanting to replace the front ramp with an upside-down razorback turret - has anyone tried that?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2011/02/15 06:46:27
Subject: Slight Stormraven Conversion
|
 |
Homicidal Veteran Blood Angel Assault Marine
|
Now that does make that brick look better. I'm a big hater for the hump/turret as well, they look silly and this conversion does look more balanced. I'm personally itching as well to buy a git and make it look more air-worthy as well.
I've personally been pondering how hard it would be to cut the wings off the engine pods and move them forward to that that thing actually looks balanced instead of this horrid front-heaviness. Possibly stretching the wings out back to their original width or just keeping them stubbier, dunno about that one...
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2011/02/15 06:46:46
|
|
 |
 |
|