Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I really want another reason to use my Magnus the Warlord, since I tend to use Magnus1 the most and have been really interested in the idea of the Bad Seeds army list, I like the idea of the rogue Cygnar army, and it had some cool Jacks, Sentinels and Defenders look pretty neat to paint up, and I like the Ranger units, but I really am wondering if it's worth using as a reasonably competitive tier, or if it's more fun than anything.

Definitely not overly competitive, but it certainly looks like it could be fun to play when everyone else isn't bringing their absolute A-game. And why is that?

Trenchers. God I love trenchers.

Well, like I said, I really want to use Magnus the Traitor more, I love the model and am getting a decent feel for him, and it seems like it is an interesting tier to try. Plus, if I ever wanted to start Cygnar, I would only need to pick up a single caster, and I would have everything to run at least Mercnar. Plus, I'm always interested in new ways to run my mercs, it's half the fun of the army to me.