Switch Theme:

[1850] - Dark eldar's HOUR  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Regular Dakkanaut




Could I win some games with that ?


DE 1850

Grotesquerie

Haemonculus 70
6x Grotesques + Raider DL NS 285


HQ
Slyssh 25

Troops
10 warriors + raider + splinter track + DL + NS 170
10 warriors + raider + splinter track + DL + NS 170
5 warriors + blaster + venom SC 120
5 warriors + blaster + venom SC 120
5 warriors + blaster + venom SC 120
5 warriors + blaster + venom SC 120

Elites
Mandrake x3 36

Fast attack
Razorwing 2DL SC NT 150
Razorwing 2DL SC NT 150
Scourges 5x 4 HWB 120
Reavers x3 CT 63

Heavy
Talos HT + Flails 130


Im open to your suggestions :O
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran




You could.. if you make the grots small enough to fit into their raider (bulky). And take a second unit to make the formation legal. Or well just break the 6 into 2 x 3 and give the second unit a ride, then salt with aberration + weapon to taste or even leave them bare depending on what you face.

You didn't list it but it looks like your going with RSR detachment due to 4 FA choices. Yet your heavy on troops. This is a bad design IMO since your giving up objective secured and the reroll on strategic for just those 3 bikes. I'd commit to one or the other and make it worthwhile, i.e. max the FA choices or else drop something and go CAD. I'd suggest dropping one squad of warriors to get that second grot unit a raider or else drop the bike squad for the same purpose.

Talos I'm not a fan of. I've heard good things about dark artisan and corpsethief claw but I've never had much success with 6" slogging combat units. ymmv but I'd suggest getting more anti tank in there somewhere instead. Currently your turn 1 AT (and possibly t2) consists of the scourges 3 lances and 4 18" blasters. Now if thats sufficient where you play due to little to no mech then carry on but usually its not. Also consider that dark light is our primary means of dealing with wraithknights/GMCs.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/10/07 13:55:15


 
   
Made in ca
Regular Dakkanaut




dominuschao wrote:
You could.. if you make the grots small enough to fit into their raider (bulky). And take a second unit to make the formation legal. Or well just break the 6 into 2 x 3 and give the second unit a ride, then salt with aberration + weapon to taste or even leave them bare depending on what you face.

You didn't list it but it looks like your going with RSR detachment due to 4 FA choices. Yet your heavy on troops. This is a bad design IMO since your giving up objective secured and the reroll on strategic for just those 3 bikes. I'd commit to one or the other and make it worthwhile, i.e. max the FA choices or else drop something and go CAD. I'd suggest dropping one squad of warriors to get that second grot unit a raider or else drop the bike squad for the same purpose.

Talos I'm not a fan of. I've heard good things about dark artisan and corpsethief claw but I've never had much success with 6" slogging combat units. ymmv but I'd suggest getting more anti tank in there somewhere instead. Currently your turn 1 AT (and possibly t2) consists of the scourges 3 lances and 4 18" blasters. Now if thats sufficient where you play due to little to no mech then carry on but usually its not. Also consider that dark light is our primary means of dealing with wraithknights/GMCs.


Hey thanks for advices, i didnt realize the bulky ill make some changements so ill keep objectifs secured !


Automatically Appended Next Post:
DE 1850

Grotesquerie 505

Haemonculus 70 + ( 25 agoniser )

Grotesques 1x aberation + LG 130 + raider + NS + DL 75
Grotesques 1x aberation + LG 130 + raider + NS + DL 75



CAD

HQ
Slyssh 25

Troops
5x warriors blaster + venom SC 120
10x warriors splinter canon + raider + DL + ST + NS 185
5x warriors blaster + venom SC 120
( 5x warriors blaster + venom SC 120 )
( 5x warriors blaster + venom SC 120 )
( 5x warriors blaster + venom SC 120 )

Elites
Mandrakes x5 60

Fast attack
Razorwing 2DL SC NT ( NS ) 150 ( 15 )
Razorwing 2DL SC NT ( NS ) 150 ( 15 )
Scourges x5 4 HWB 120


Heavy
Talos HWB + LG 145

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/10/07 15:35:40


 
   
Made in nz
Dark Eldar in Regeneration Tube






I'd drop the SC on the razorwings if you're taking DL. If you're using the lances you won't be using the cannon.

Nice to see some Liquifier guns as well, i personally quite like them but they did take a hit on power.

You might even consider swapping out the ssyth for a medusae for some extra LD and shooty. Just a thought.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Army Lists
Go to: