Switch Theme:

[1500] - Necron - Mephrit - Nemesor - God Shackled C'tan  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Member of the Malleus






Mephirt Dynasty Cohort

Nemesor
Cryptek + godshackle

20 Warriors
Ghost Arc

5 Immortals - Heavy Gauss
Night Scythe

5 Immortals - Tesla

4 Wraiths

Transcendent C'tan (T8, Str9, 5W with god shackle).

Monolith.

- Basic plan is Nemesor/Crptek/20 warriors start on field with Wraiths. Turn 2 pick the reroll reserve power to bring in Night Scythe, C'tan and Monolith into play turn 2.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/01/29 03:45:39


Task Force Rath : 5000
Deathwatch: 4000
6000+ 
   
Made in gb
Sneaky Striking Scorpion






One question, what does the God shackle do?

There's no turning back... Triumph or oblivion. 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran




I don't think the mephrit dynasty 3+ fnp applies to the trancendant ctan but I could be wrong. Anyone who has the book please let me know. A trancendant ctan with 3+ fnp is mean, even meaner if you have the crypteck a cronomatron.
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut




Decay wrote:
One question, what does the God shackle do?


+1 S/T to C'tan shards.

Given that the Transcendent C'tan is hideously misnamed now, there's no balance issues caused by him having it... But he doesn't have "C'tan Shard" in the unit name so RAW is against it.

Certainly I'd not object to using the relic like that though.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Army Lists
Go to: