Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

+++ 30k Questoris Knights (2500pts) +++

++ Questoris Knight Crusade Army (Questoris Knight Crusade Army) (2500pts) ++

+ HQ +

Seneschal

····Cerastus Knight-Lancer, [Occular Augmetics


+ Troops +

Scion Martial x 2

····Questoris Knight Paladin x 2 [Bio-corrosive rounds for its heavy stubbers, Occular Augmetics, Rapid-fire battlecannon]


+ Fast Attack +

Scion Dolorous

····Questoris Knight Errant [Bio-corrosive rounds for its heavy stubbers, Occular Augmetics


Scion Uhlan

····Cerastus Knight-Acheron, Occular Aug

+ Heavy Support +

Scion Arbalester

····Cerastus Knight-Castigator, Occular Augmetics

Looks good.

The Arbalester/Cerastus is pretty much a given - Skyfire with a Castigator bolt cannon covers a gaping weak spot in most knight lists.

The Uhlan I'm intrigued by. I get wanting the Acheron up front and centre as fast as possible, though. I guess I'm just used to seeing Uhlan Lancers.

The other one I've seen is an Uhlan Styrix - the Ionic Flare shield used to compensate for the weaker front armour.

No Arbalester Styrix? No Preceptor Acheron? Those are such solid choices, you may want to consider them. Not a fan of the Uhlan or Dolorious myself.