MeanGreenStompa wrote:
Kanluwen wrote:
MeanGreenStompa wrote:
Kanluwen wrote:
I agree with you that it
shouldn't make a difference, but that's the way
GW runs their stuff right now. It makes a difference to the manager, and from what has been said
GW will let their managers run the shops as they please unless something directly conflicts with a set policy.
The policy is basically 'go forth and make profit by means you see fit'. It isn't 'ban some things we make that you personally haven't sold'.
And how do you expect them to make profit from things they can't sell?
How do they sell items to people who no longer return to the store due to being told which
GW products they can and cannot use.
How do they sell items to people who might have no intention of buying anything to begin with?
This is staggeringly idiotic and the fact there are people defending it is astounding.
No, what's astounding is that it is almost always the same people who come in to these "X disallowed in my
GW store" to decry it and whine about how it's stupid/unconsumer friendly/<insert trending word of the week> constantly make a point about the fact that they don't buy/play anything
GW anymore--and that they never played/set foot in a
GW store before or had one bad experience in one and have written off ALL the stores because of it.
When the next 'bright ideas' store manager starts demanding that people can only bring GW models in that they have receipts for from that store, are the same people going to come forward and defend it?!? Because it's the Exact same thing, it's company product not bought at that company store.
No, you're right. It is exactly the same thing.
Except a store manager very likely will never do that. Know why?
Because if someone comes in for their first time and sees someone playing an army that they can sell off the shelf, they don't have to explain why Soandso is using something that the person cannot just buy today from the manager.
These aren't franchises, these are sales venues for the company.
These are sales venues for a specific part of the company. I don't like it, you don't like it, and I sincerely doubt that the managers like it either.
Good managers aren't just managing the shop--they're part of the local gaming community. It's no different than any independent shop, just one of them has a corporate tag attached to it.
Commission isn't wage. Driving people out of your store, providing barriers to selling more stock and producing ill will and negativity aren't good ideas to help you turn over stock, they're a short road to a closed store.
Commission isn't wage, you're right. But wage with sales figures affecting your pay might as well be commission.
You're not a person who plays/shops/whatevers at Bottle's store. Nor am I. I can't tell you why the manager did this, but from what Bottle posted most recently?
It seems like it did not really affect the players at the shop too much.