18499
Post by: Henners91
The eyebrows... THE EYEBROWS! Automatically Appended Next Post: Oh and the real weird looking six-pack... I'm assuming that could just be down to the painting style.
Still, y'all could pretend the one on the right was a Sister of Battle...
28422
Post by: Citizensmith
28235
Post by: Necroman
Those massive furry eyebrows haunt my soul.
23617
Post by: Lexx
One word. Razorgor..
35293
Post by: mdjmattyy
L
OL, they are pretty grotesque
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Lol*
33030
Post by: nickmund
Hahah! What are you talking about? That ork cheerleader rules!
9323
Post by: gazelle
I don't have any pics available, but trust me, some of the Fat Lady Fighters from the late '80's were very scary...
23400
Post by: Ma55ter_fett
I think that those slaves could have only been sculpted by a man who had never before seen a woman's body.
9010
Post by: Rymafyr
The one on the right is a SoB. Originally they come with the Asdrubael Vect set. On his Dais, there are a row of spikes and one is missing. The SoB model is holding a spike in her chained hands. The painting is what's so horrible about these two models.
11961
Post by: Ifalna
The one on the left looks like Marylin Monroe gone horribly wrong. Horribly, horribly wrong. Going to second that the sculpter has never seen a woman before, or is blind.
102
Post by: Jayden63
The slave girls are really not that bad. I'm not the best painter in the world, but I've used both those models in my Slannesh army and they really don't look bad with a better paint job.
The ones in the examples have gone too far into the detailing catagory. Useing some softer shading and thinner lines help the girls to not look bad at all.
34420
Post by: PraetorDave
Could the nipples on the one on the left be a little more pronounced? Just sayin', it must be a bit chilly where ever she is 
18499
Post by: Henners91
You can see it's because of too much toning... but there are some recesses that really just shouldn't be there...
20662
Post by: Hawkins
Ma55ter_fett wrote:I think that those slaves could have only been sculpted by a man who had never before seen a woman's body.
and you would be right sir, ask any GW sculpter if he has seen 'insert movie, book, person game anything here ' and he will deneigh ever seeing or even knowing that ''insert movie, book, person, game anything here ' ever existed.  apperently they are raised in creshes deep under the domain of JJ's house, and never see the light of day (or women).
34242
Post by: -Loki-
Jayden63 wrote:The slave girls are really not that bad. I'm not the best painter in the world, but I've used both those models in my Slannesh army and they really don't look bad with a better paint job.
Probably would have been better off ordering some of Hasslefrees stuff for that purpose. If only because they look far better.
29408
Post by: Melissia
Yeah, seriously. The Sororitas one has man-shoulders >.<
20662
Post by: Hawkins
-Loki- wrote:Jayden63 wrote:The slave girls are really not that bad. I'm not the best painter in the world, but I've used both those models in my Slannesh army and they really don't look bad with a better paint job.
Probably would have been better off ordering some of Hasslefrees stuff for that purpose. If only because they look far better.
Absolutely.
102
Post by: Jayden63
Hawkins wrote:-Loki- wrote:Jayden63 wrote:The slave girls are really not that bad. I'm not the best painter in the world, but I've used both those models in my Slannesh army and they really don't look bad with a better paint job.
Probably would have been better off ordering some of Hasslefrees stuff for that purpose. If only because they look far better.
Absolutely.
Maybe, but this was 7ish yrs ago. GW bitz order was still in production and since it was a tournament army I wanted to use exclusively GW models. So I went with the best of what I could use.
17923
Post by: Asherian Command
yeah those models are the joke of the 40k universe just like the Shape-shifters...
29878
Post by: Chowderhead
The UGLIEST Wargaming model EVER.
17923
Post by: Asherian Command
chowderhead13 wrote:
The UGLIEST Wargaming model EVER.
Hey look its Senator Mark Kirk!
27582
Post by: Smarteye
I bought these as objective counters for my new BA army. I can assure you that their much better in person.
17923
Post by: Asherian Command
Eh. no
28235
Post by: Necroman
chowderhead13 wrote:
The UGLIEST Wargaming model EVER.
I LOVE that model.
Seriously, he has a board with a nail in it in one hand, and a laser gun in the other. What's not to like?
25798
Post by: Asgeirr Darkwolf
Agree with Melissa... the painting, also, in adition to parts of the models are fugly... and I feel the nipple one should have tassles...
I see all above pictures, and raise you... CANIS WOLFBORN AND FANGIR!
http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat440279a&prodId=prod60017a
That wolf ate some lead chips as a pup, I swear... LOOK AT THE EYES! 
34899
Post by: Eumerin
and I feel the nipple one should have tassles...
That actually might be appropriate. Keep in mind that these are slaves put on display onboard Vect's personal craft. He's going to make sure that the slaves he's showing off don't look "ordinary". Assuming that Dark Eldar admire the same physical traits that humans do, a large rack on the females is - for once - appropriate. As is a bra that encourages the display of nipples.
The paint job is awful, though. And I have to wonder about the eyebrows. I don't remember noticing them on this pair before.
On a side note, there was apparently also a very limited release of these two ladies without the bras.
29408
Post by: Melissia
While FAngir's eyes are weird, the rest of the model is as good as you could expect for a thunderwolf cavalry model.
11511
Post by: theocd
From left to right:
Obese Marine, Moody Teenage Marine, Dang! That was a curry fart marine and (my favourite) buttscratcher marine!
The OC-D
7361
Post by: Howard A Treesong
Henners91 wrote:Automatically Appended Next Post:
Oh and the real weird looking six-pack... I'm assuming that could just be down to the painting style.
Still, y'all could pretend the one on the right was a Sister of Battle...
These are actually nicely sculpted figures, the painting just isn't doing them justice at all. They just don't have muscles that pronounced and the contrast used on them to achieve that effect isn't appropriate...on almost any figure - real people don't have dark lines around their muscles. The eyebrows are finer on the actual model so why they have been painted the way they have makes no sense.
20841
Post by: Shas'O Dorian
2726
Post by: J'santai Khan
I nominate the original Lemartes model. That thing was hideous!
18499
Post by: Henners91
I actually like that Nagash model, he feels rather retro.
I'm tempted to put up a poll asking how many Dakkaites have seen a woman's body ;P Automatically Appended Next Post: chowderhead13 wrote:
The UGLIEST Wargaming model EVER.
Nah, shave the mohawk off and he looks badass!
29680
Post by: SaintHazard
Shave off the mohawk, give him a few more teeth, remove the gigantic Flava Flav Inquisition bling, get rid of the eyeshadow, have him holding something more menacing than a large stick, and MAYBE that model will look anything other than completely ridiculous.
20768
Post by: Forgotmytea
Aw, I like the old Thousand Son model! Still got a couple of them in my current Thousand Sons force actually 
14392
Post by: nerdfest09
Lemartes:= scuba steve!
18499
Post by: Henners91
Forgotmytea wrote:
Aw, I like the old Thousand Son model! Still got a couple of them in my current Thousand Sons force actually
I don't understand the problem either, all of those models are gorgeous.
4820
Post by: Ailaros
Right, you've got to separate ugly in a good way from ugly in a bad way.
For example, GW has made some Nurgle models that are VERY ugly, but ugly in a good way.
They have also made some models that are just really poorly done, and they really shouldnt be selling any of them anymore (some of which they don't).
5182
Post by: SlaveToDorkness
I believe those slaves were painted by the same Eavy Metal painter as the new Minotaur models. WAY over accented musculature makes good models look horrible. They should fire the painter, not the sculptor.
I second the one about the original Lemartes and his TV antenna crozius. HORRIBLE model.
18499
Post by: Henners91
Tbh I wouldn't be lying if I said that I thought I could do a better job...
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
the ork cheerleader was pretty hidious, but this one is even grosser.
She needs to shave those pits, and whats with the 3 stooges hair style?
http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat490015a&prodId=prod1560095
22508
Post by: FlingitNow
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
i actually like the shape and style of old Suits.
if they did a better sculpt of it it would be really cool.
99
Post by: insaniak
Eumerin wrote:On a side note, there was apparently also a very limited release of these two ladies without the bras.
The models exist, but they weren't actually released for sale.
26225
Post by: General Seric
J'santai Khan wrote:I nominate the original Lemartes model. That thing was hideous!
nerdfest09 wrote:Lemartes:= scuba steve!
SlaveToDorkness wrote:I believe those slaves were painted by the same Eavy Metal painter as the new Minotaur models. WAY over accented musculature makes good models look horrible. They should fire the painter, not the sculptor.
I second the one about the original Lemartes and his TV antenna crozius. HORRIBLE model.
J'santai Khan wrote:I nominate the original Lemartes model. That thing was hideous!
Ok, now I MUST know, are there any pictures of him? I have tried a google serch, but it did not turn up anything other than this edition and last edition models. With so many people who hate it, I have to see how bad it is.
31337
Post by: FUUUUDGE!
Ok,9/10 of this thread needs to be cleansed by the witch-hunters.
28235
Post by: Necroman
Those are bad?
All hail the nutcracker clown!
And the Pumbagor also looks hilarious.
5182
Post by: SlaveToDorkness
General Seric wrote:
Ok, now I MUST know, are there any pictures of him? I have tried a google serch, but it did not turn up anything other than this edition and last edition models. With so many people who hate it, I have to see how bad it is.
Painted by Gunamar Ironwill on CMoN. Great paint on a HORRIBLE model.
99
Post by: insaniak
General Seric wrote:Ok, now I MUST know, are there any pictures of him? I have tried a google serch, but it did not turn up anything other than this edition and last edition models. With so many people who hate it, I have to see how bad it is.
The last edition model was the original one. One of a handful of models done by Mike McVey when he decided he wanted to try his hand at sculpting during his last couple of years with GW, along with some fairly awkward (and surprisingly young) Space Wolf Scouts.
28848
Post by: KamikazeCanuck
wow, that's just.....ya, you win.
25798
Post by: Asgeirr Darkwolf
Aww... look at Lemartes the lost puppy.... those eyes on that face...
5421
Post by: JohnHwangDD
Nagash.
This is the highest-rated version on CMON, and even that painter couldn't save the model.
31272
Post by: Battle Brother Lucifer
Hmm, Nagash looks like he could be an epic model with a head swap and staff removal.
17923
Post by: Asherian Command
are you guys kidding me? 33$ for 4 guys??!?!?!?!? That suck!!?!?!?!??!
33172
Post by: ChiliPowderKeg
The one and only Krootox model. It looks somewhat decent. But seeing multiple units of it, in the SAME constipated looking pose with only two facial expressions, is quite aggravating.
160th post
5421
Post by: JohnHwangDD
battle Brother Lucifer wrote:Hmm, Nagash looks like he could be an epic model with a head swap and staff removal.
Maybe...  There's a pretty big gap between concept and reality.
23223
Post by: Monster Rain
I actually agree with Lucifer.
Nagash's head is... unfortunate but the model has potential.
33172
Post by: ChiliPowderKeg
Here's one to take a slice of the cake.
Aun'Va and his inflatable doll retinue
Time to crack down on the Space Pope.
-He's got some kind of extra joint in his right arm near the wrist
-The left half of his face is elevated higher than the other giving some kind of tilted jello appearance to his head
-The guards' feet hooves look more like feet
18499
Post by: Henners91
Lemartes looks... fine? Just ignore the purity seals?
26225
Post by: General Seric
SlaveToDorkness wrote:General Seric wrote:
Ok, now I MUST know, are there any pictures of him? I have tried a google serch, but it did not turn up anything other than this edition and last edition models. With so many people who hate it, I have to see how bad it is.
Painted by Gunamar Ironwill on CMoN. Great paint on a HORRIBLE model.
he is not as bad as I would imagine him to be, his head is weird and he looks somewhat small, but I do not think he diserves ugliest model status.
Edit:
after loooking at it a little more, for some reasom he looks like a little kid in power armor. Its something about the face, and how the jump pack and the staff makes him look little
5421
Post by: JohnHwangDD
Lemartes is a sad panda. 
34899
Post by: Eumerin
General Seric wrote:Edit:
after loooking at it a little more, for some reasom he looks like a little kid in power armor. Its something about the face, and how the jump pack and the staff makes him look little
I think for me it's mostly the fact that he looks like he's giving you puppy-dog eyes. It makes me curious how much is the model's fault, and how much is the painter's fault.
26225
Post by: General Seric
Eumerin wrote:General Seric wrote:Edit:
after loooking at it a little more, for some reasom he looks like a little kid in power armor. Its something about the face, and how the jump pack and the staff makes him look little
I think for me it's mostly the fact that he looks like he's giving you puppy-dog eyes. It makes me curious how much is the model's fault, and how much is the painter's fault.
It does not look as bad, at least, on this model:
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://40kwithbigd.files.wordpress.com/2008/04/chaplain-lemartes.jpg&imgrefurl=http://40kwithbigd.wordpress.com/&usg=__ENHA2Pj3vRt5IkjqH4--69aVKYM=&h=1536&w=2048&sz=503&hl=en&start=0&sig2=ADy1CSlY3cDOhBL6TedHUA&zoom=1&tbnid=YaVsQJVWwLdZBM:&tbnh=147&tbnw=196&ei=nw_GTNymE4P48AbJnLGkDw&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dlemartes%2B40k%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26rlz%3D1T4ADRA_enUS356US358%26biw%3D1895%26bih%3D757%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=668&vpy=239&dur=636&hovh=194&hovw=259&tx=179&ty=106&oei=nw_GTNymE4P48AbJnLGkDw&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=43&ved=1t:429,r:14,s:0
or this: (full model shot)
http://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ldbTl1xkOpc/SmSqIokvarI/AAAAAAAACXU/f4VQae4yctM/s320/Lemartes-2.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.heresy-online.net/forums/showthread.php%3Ft%3D42013&usg=__He17HJL9CgP-vyOvf_cgswpf_cA=&h=320&w=214&sz=25&hl=en&start=0&sig2=P07-PFG6r4yqi2JLhFO5fg&zoom=1&tbnid=q7uIzZCiGRKrxM:&tbnh=147&tbnw=98&ei=IxDGTM-zBYqr8Abko52tDw&prev=/images%3Fq%3Dlemartes%2B40k%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN%26rlz%3D1T4ADRA_enUS356US358%26biw%3D1895%26bih%3D757%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=hc&vpx=1244&vpy=208&dur=14144&hovh=256&hovw=171&tx=80&ty=165&oei=IxDGTM-zBYqr8Abko52tDw&esq=1&page=1&ndsp=43&ved=1t:429,r:17,s:0
yay, I think it might be the painters fault with the way he painted the eyes
5182
Post by: SlaveToDorkness
The Face, The stupid weapon (what part of it would hurt you?), the 10 lb. terminator honor on a 3" thick rope hanging from his bolt pistol, etc...
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
The most danger you would ever be in is the Terminator badge whacking you across the kneecaps when he tries to cave your face in with his pistol.
the Crozious is horrible. on the other hand, i bet he gets great Wi-fi  Automatically Appended Next Post: Eumerin wrote:On a side note, there was apparently also a very limited release of these two ladies without the bras.
Pics or it didn't happen
34899
Post by: Eumerin
Grey Templar wrote:Automatically Appended Next Post:
Eumerin wrote:On a side note, there was apparently also a very limited release of these two ladies without the bras.
Pics or it didn't happen
lol
If you're *really* curious - for intellectual purposes only, obviously *cough* - there's a website out there that attempts to track all of the old and/or rare GW miniatures that have been released over the years. They've got pics of the pair both with and without bras iirc - unpainted, mind you.
You'll need to run down the site address on your own, though (and I actually do encourage a visit to look at what GW's produced over the years). It's been quite a while since I was last there.
5421
Post by: JohnHwangDD
Grey Templar wrote:Eumerin wrote:On a side note, there was apparently also a very limited release of these two ladies without the bras.
Pics or it didn't happen
You mean, like *this*?  no, it's not the actual model
9217
Post by: KingCracker
*Note this is not mine......thank GOD* Ok here is the one I throw into the vote. And uh......I win. Seriously no way you can make this mini look not ugly 
33172
Post by: ChiliPowderKeg
KingCracker wrote:*Note this is not mine......thank GOD*
Ok here is the one I throw into the vote.
And uh......I win. Seriously no way you can make this mini look not ugly
I do believe someone here did a "Truescale" version of that, which looks pretty awesome.
29871
Post by: xxmatt85
MY EYES MY EYES!
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
Ahhh, yes. First Edition Dreadnoughts.
i say that those who hate the Washing machines of today have no right to complain. the originals were far worse.
17923
Post by: Asherian Command
Yeah it would be cool to have one. Or a prehersey dreadnought would be supa awesome sauces!
518
Post by: Kid_Kyoto
Henners91 wrote:
The eyebrows... THE EYEBROWS!
Automatically Appended Next Post:
Oh and the real weird looking six-pack... I'm assuming that could just be down to the painting style.
Still, y'all could pretend the one on the right was a Sister of Battle...
She is an SOB, you can see the Fleur de Lil tattoo on her arm, and the extra spike she's about to speak Vect with.
It's a shame that since these are about the only sexy models GW has ever made (unless you have a weird skull bra fetish) you see them a lot.
Bronze Age makes some others in the slave Leia/John Carter of Mars style.
http://www.bronzeagemin.com/miniatures_html/25MM/SCI-FI/Red%20Men/Dead-Earth-imperials.htm
But give me Copplestone's Bikini gals any day.
9217
Post by: KingCracker
ChiliPowderKeg wrote:KingCracker wrote:*Note this is not mine......thank GOD*
Ok here is the one I throw into the vote.
And uh......I win. Seriously no way you can make this mini look not ugly
I do believe someone here did a "Truescale" version of that, which looks pretty awesome.
DO believe? Pics man, pics. I find it more difficult to make the 1st edition dred cool, then proving Micheal Jackson didnt have a thing for children
34899
Post by: Eumerin
Hey, now, I kinda like the old dreads! Yeah, they're a bit silly, but they've got a lot more character than the stubby-legged boxes that the marines use now!
I've still got one of the old quad-bolter dreads, albeit in pieces. It'd been assembled at one point and base-coated in blue-grey, but then it was set aside and eventually most of the joints came unglued. One of these days, when I do my Space Wolf army (which should be any decade now...), I'm going to put it back together again and put it on the game table just to watch my opponent do a double-take and ask "What the Hell is THAT!?"
31026
Post by: SmackCakes
I think Lemartes has to go down as one of the all time weakest sculpts. His crozius looks like it was made from a space marine back banner, and his helmet makes him look like some kind of evil sunflower head. :/
34899
Post by: Eumerin
Eumerin wrote:Grey Templar wrote:Automatically Appended Next Post:
Eumerin wrote:On a side note, there was apparently also a very limited release of these two ladies without the bras.
Pics or it didn't happen
lol
If you're *really* curious - for intellectual purposes only, obviously *cough* - there's a website out there that attempts to track all of the old and/or rare GW miniatures that have been released over the years. They've got pics of the pair both with and without bras iirc - unpainted, mind you.
You'll need to run down the site address on your own, though (and I actually do encourage a visit to look at what GW's produced over the years). It's been quite a while since I was last there.
I decided to go ahead and locate the site myself. After a little searching, I found it again. Link is here - http://www.collecting-citadel-miniatures.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
That's the front page. If you want to locate specific models, you'll have to do that on your own.
Unfortunately, not everything listed in there has a picture associated with it. That's hardly surprising considering the number of limited release and unreleased figures in the galleries. As a result, it sometimes means that an entry might have an interesting or amusing name, but you're left with no idea what the miniature looks like. As someone with a WHFB Dark Elf army (though I haven't played in a while), I'm curious about the "bath time hag"... but there's no picture for her or her attendents.
(I'm guessing that the original idea was that you could have her bathe in your Cauldron of Blood)
24567
Post by: Kroothawk
While Nagash and Pumbagor have been listed, let's not forget the metal Possessed, too ugly for even being in the webstore as collector items:
Or the old archon and wyches:
Henners91 wrote:
The eyebrows... THE EYEBROWS!
They have a face?
7361
Post by: Howard A Treesong
JohnHwangDD wrote:Grey Templar wrote:Eumerin wrote:On a side note, there was apparently also a very limited release of these two ladies without the bras.
Pics or it didn't happen
You mean, like *this*?
http://hotimg23.fotki.com/a/65_255/209_242/FamilFl-vi.jpg
no, it's not the actual model
No but these are.
http://www.collecting-citadel-miniatures.com/wiki/index.php/Image:Unreleased_-_Dark_Eldar_Prisoner.jpg
and
http://www.collecting-citadel-miniatures.com/wiki/index.php/Image:Unreleased_-_Dark_Eldar_Slave.jpg
Produced within the studio and not released in any fashion. There are not many, but some have gone into the market, I recall a couple selling for nearly $200 on eBay which shows what some people will pay for a couple of tiny nipples.
In a similar vein there are also topless Witch Elves...
http://www.collecting-citadel-miniatures.com/wiki/index.php/Image:Unreleased_-_Dark_Elf_Witch_Elf_1.jpg
25443
Post by: JSK-Fox
General Seric wrote:SlaveToDorkness wrote:General Seric wrote:
Ok, now I MUST know, are there any pictures of him? I have tried a google serch, but it did not turn up anything other than this edition and last edition models. With so many people who hate it, I have to see how bad it is.
Painted by Gunamar Ironwill on CMoN. Great paint on a HORRIBLE model.
he is not as bad as I would imagine him to be, his head is weird and he looks somewhat small, but I do not think he diserves ugliest model status.
Edit:
after loooking at it a little more, for some reasom he looks like a little kid in power armor. Its something about the face, and how the jump pack and the staff makes him look little
I can imagine him saying, "Daddy, can I use yur beatstick? Pwease? /puppy dog eyes.
9217
Post by: KingCracker
Ill say the RT dred, is easily the ugliest "vehicle" and the Lamartes would be in the running for ugliest mini. That sculpt really IS bad. I mean, look how big that cross thing is hanging from his pistol (looks like it anyways) yikes
8044
Post by: Arctik_Firangi
It's not the worst sculpt, but it sure is ugly.
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
Arctik_Firangi wrote:It's not the worst sculpt, but it sure is ugly.
Hey, that's actually a nice model.
And it's supposed to be ugly.
Edit: check out those Fishnet stockings
23115
Post by: OoieGoie
Go Reaper if you want your girlie mini's. I pick up my Eldar Farseers from there. Mmm Reaper Farseers. *drool*
GW are starting to get better with the fem mini. About time. Some of the new DE chicks look good.
99
Post by: insaniak
Howard A Treesong wrote:Produced within the studio and not released in any fashion. There are not many, but some have gone into the market, I recall a couple selling for nearly $200 on eBay which shows what some people will pay for a couple of tiny nipples.
It's not so much people paying for the nipples, as people being prepared to pay exorbitant amounts for unreleased models. Any of the studio-only unreleased models that have found their way onto eBay over the years have gone for big money. People pay for the novelty of having something that almost nobody else is going to have...
29680
Post by: SaintHazard
insaniak wrote:It's not so much people paying for the nipples, as people being prepared to pay exorbitant amounts for unreleased models. Any of the studio-only unreleased models that have found their way onto eBay over the years have gone for big money. People pay for the novelty of having something that almost nobody else is going to have...
Yes, that's the reason. 
7361
Post by: Howard A Treesong
insaniak wrote:Howard A Treesong wrote:Produced within the studio and not released in any fashion. There are not many, but some have gone into the market, I recall a couple selling for nearly $200 on eBay which shows what some people will pay for a couple of tiny nipples.
It's not so much people paying for the nipples, as people being prepared to pay exorbitant amounts for unreleased models. Any of the studio-only unreleased models that have found their way onto eBay over the years have gone for big money. People pay for the novelty of having something that almost nobody else is going to have...
I do look at the unreleased stuff fairly regularly, but these went for an unusually high amount even for unreleased miniatures. Unreleased squats sell for a lot, and these were more than those.
32726
Post by: mordian
gazelle wrote:I don't have any pics available, but trust me, some of the Fat Lady Fighters from the late '80's were very scary...
I didn't know you could get a dawn french model. LOL
30073
Post by: revackey
Kroothawk wrote:While Nagash and Pumbagor have been listed, let's not forget the metal Possessed, too ugly for even being in the webstore as collector items:
Or the old archon and wyches:
Henners91 wrote:
The eyebrows... THE EYEBROWS!
They have a face?
I actually like the old metal ones...
I think the old Archon gets my vote.
34515
Post by: Wiglaf
At least the slaves are vaguely sexy and Nagash have lot of detail...but what about the old Von Carstein vampires? they are ugly AND simple. Unforgivable.
30073
Post by: revackey
Nuff said?
20768
Post by: Forgotmytea
revackey wrote:http://www.games-workshop.com/MEDIA_CustomProductCatalog/m1251505_99069915043_DaemonSlaaneshFiendDirect3Main_873x627.jpg
Nuff said?
I don't think that the paint job helps much there, but yes, that's definitely in the rankings
6769
Post by: Tri
center dwalf ... naked dwalf is naked 
18499
Post by: Henners91
Oh God, I never realised how stupidly proportioned Dwarves and their weapons are...
26225
Post by: General Seric
Tri wrote:
center dwalf ... naked dwalf is naked
The look on his face is also funny, the others all look angry, but he just looks Tired,Confused, or Drunk. Mabey he forgot to put clothes on after geting out of bed? 
33172
Post by: ChiliPowderKeg
A decent amount of the Lord of the Rings range are pretty gakky. Especially these three!  This thread belongs more in Dakka Discussions, once you think of it  Shall one of the Glorious Mods move it?
6769
Post by: Tri
Grey Templar wrote:Eumerin wrote:On a side note, there was apparently also a very limited release of these two ladies without the bras.
Pics or it didn't happen
 
They still look ugly
99
Post by: insaniak
Howard A Treesong wrote:I do look at the unreleased stuff fairly regularly, but these went for an unusually high amount even for unreleased miniatures. Unreleased squats sell for a lot, and these were more than those.
The unreleased squats pop up a little more often than these girls do, though.
30073
Post by: revackey
I agree, that models good, just the base is ewww.
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
it can't decide weather it's a fantesy or a 40K model
21940
Post by: nels1031
I always thought that Macharius was one of the better Imperial Guard characters GW has ever made.
it can't decide weather it's a fantesy or a 40K model
Thats the best part, file/clip out the 40k bits and its a perfectly fine Empire General. I've seen stellar paint jobs and scenic bases that make this dude look epic in both game systems. A bit on the small side from what I remember though.
The most entertaining thing about these threads is seeing how peoples tastes vary so wildly.
32545
Post by: Element206
terrible models....although probably not the worst...there is a figure (most likely from the same model range or game) that look like a worn out hag thats retired from a brothel....she has 1 shoe on and is bald!...looks awful
31545
Post by: AlexHolker
I remain convinced that whoever sculpted the fiends has never seen a breast. And I mean never. They were probably bottle-fed as a baby.
3289
Post by: 12thRonin
Wasn't Lemartes one of the last of McVey's "phone it in" scuplts as he was leaving for PP?
5421
Post by: JohnHwangDD
Element206 wrote:terrible models....although probably not the worst...there is a figure (most likely from the same model range or game) that look like a worn out hag thats retired from a brothel....she has 1 shoe on and is bald!...looks awful
Um, what are you talking about?
686
Post by: aka_mythos
I think Nagash is the worst model GW has available: http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?prodId=prod1140299&rootCatGameStyle=
Despite its size and being a collectors piece GW still hasn't raised the price, what does that say?
Goofy detail and poor porportions.
9202
Post by: Solorg
I'm sorry, my opinion is simply that GW can't do women.
9217
Post by: KingCracker
SaintHazard wrote:insaniak wrote:It's not so much people paying for the nipples, as people being prepared to pay exorbitant amounts for unreleased models. Any of the studio-only unreleased models that have found their way onto eBay over the years have gone for big money. People pay for the novelty of having something that almost nobody else is going to have...
Yes, that's the reason.
No Id agree with insaniak on that one. Cmon its VERY easy to find minis with nipples and full boobs. Why not pay crazy prices for those? Oh thats right, because there are more then 100 of them made thats why Automatically Appended Next Post:
lol yea thats just horrible in many many ways
29680
Post by: SaintHazard
KingCracker wrote:No Id agree with insaniak on that one. Cmon its VERY easy to find minis with nipples and full boobs. Why not pay crazy prices for those? Oh thats right, because there are more then 100 of them made thats why
But they don't include a Sister of Battle.
26523
Post by: Ribon Fox
Solorg wrote:I'm sorry, my opinion is simply that GW can't do women.
Well some one there can, ever see any of the Esher gangers from Necromunda?   Nice minies for converting into IG units, granted cut their mad hair then green stuff a better bufont on them This one I put forward as one of their worst sculpts, the Blood Bowl Khemri cheerleader  Note the Brass bra the walking undead has
9594
Post by: RiTides
Lexx wrote:One word. Razorgor..
You know, I just saw this model in person the other day, and didn't think it was that bad.
The pictures make it look like some crazy boar-sized spikey beast... whereas it's an absolute Monster size-wise, and that helps the rest of it work a bit better.
Granted, this was a bare metal model / unpainted, but it wasn't nearly as bad as the pics made me expect!
34899
Post by: Eumerin
Ribon Fox wrote:Solorg wrote:I'm sorry, my opinion is simply that GW can't do women.
Well some one there can, ever see any of the Esher gangers from Necromunda?
I've still got a box of those sitting unpainted.
/sigh
It's been a while since I took a close look at them, but iirc they were decent figures.
This one I put forward as one of their worst sculpts, the Blood Bowl Khemri cheerleader
Note the Brass bra the walking undead has
Now that's funny.
I remain convinced that whoever sculpted the fiends has never seen a breast. And I mean never.
The first miniatures that I ever painted were a pair of fiends back around '90. I had to kludge the legs in order to get them to fit properly, but I remain convinced that those fiend sculpts were far superior to the thing that GW currently markets under the same name.
29585
Post by: AvatarForm
Ifalna wrote:The one on the left looks like Marylin Monroe gone horribly wrong. Horribly, horribly wrong. Going to second that the sculpter has never seen a woman before, or is blind.
With a little effort, I shaved off her sculpted eyebrows and when painting gave her a more womanly appearance...
9202
Post by: Solorg
Ribon Fox wrote:Solorg wrote:I'm sorry, my opinion is simply that GW can't do women.
Well some one there can, ever see any of the Esher gangers from Necromunda?
Nice minies for converting into IG units, granted cut their mad hair then green stuff a better bufont on them
I stand corrected. Those are actually quite nice. I guess I am just not a fan of the SoB or the aforementioned Slave "Girls" but these are quite well done.
21966
Post by: col. krazy kenny
Hey, who does not like oranges in tube socks.Reminds me of some of my overnite guests when i used to drink tequila.
No wonder i quit drinking and got married.
5421
Post by: JohnHwangDD
Solorg wrote:Ribon Fox wrote:Solorg wrote:I'm sorry, my opinion is simply that GW can't do women.
Well some one there can, ever see any of the Esher gangers from Necromunda?
I stand corrected. Those are actually quite nice. I guess I am just not a fan of the SoB or the aforementioned Slave "Girls" but these are quite well done.
Yep, Jes does some great work.  Hacking up the hair is tantamount to heresy, though. Jes' 1st gen Banshees are also quite good, especially considering how long ago they were sculpted. And the Juan Diaz' Daemonettes are very feminine. The basic Sisters are very good, aside from the bowl cut hair, while the Slaves merely need their eyebrows waxed.
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
i actually like the Bowl cuts the sisters have
11254
Post by: veritechc
revackey wrote:
Nuff said?
I have always hated the "Boobie Horse". If that deamon came after me I'd just laugh myself to death...
26225
Post by: General Seric
JohnHwangDD wrote:Solorg wrote:Ribon Fox wrote:Solorg wrote:I'm sorry, my opinion is simply that GW can't do women.
Well some one there can, ever see any of the Esher gangers from Necromunda?
I stand corrected. Those are actually quite nice.
I guess I am just not a fan of the SoB or the aforementioned Slave "Girls" but these are quite well done.
Yep, Jes does some great work.
Hacking up the hair is tantamount to heresy, though.
Jes' 1st gen Banshees are also quite good, especially considering how long ago they were sculpted. And the Juan Diaz' Daemonettes are very feminine.
The basic Sisters are very good, aside from the bowl cut hair, while the Slaves merely need their eyebrows waxed.
Why does the one on the left have a M-16? the others all have las weapons, but that one has a M-16 (or somthing very close).
30073
Post by: revackey
veritechc wrote:revackey wrote:
Nuff said?
I have always hated the "Boobie Horse". If that deamon came after me I'd just laugh myself to death...
Have a Techmarine give a Deamon Fiend a Purple Nurple...nuf said!
4820
Post by: Ailaros
General Seric wrote:The look on his face is also funny, the others all look angry, but he just looks Tired,Confused, or Drunk. Mabey he forgot to put clothes on after geting out of bed?
Yeah, I loled at work, which I'm not supposed to do. It's like, everyone else is furiously charging and that guy's like "Where the hell am I? How come I'm not wearing any clothes?"
Also, that blue scorpocorn is pretty awful too. I love these roughs everyone's finding in the diamonds.
34650
Post by: warlord snagrod
Asherian Command wrote:Eh. no
i od belive the ugliest model is the great unclean one am i right
30073
Post by: revackey
Nurgle doesn't count. They are supposed to be ugly.
26225
Post by: General Seric
warlord snagrod wrote:Asherian Command wrote:Eh. no
i od belive the ugliest model is the great unclean one am i right
Well, it is supposed to be ugly, this is about models that are just ugly and not in a good way.
11141
Post by: perplexiti
General Seric wrote:
Why does the one on the left have a M-16? the others all have las weapons, but that one has a M-16 (or somthing very close).
It's an autogun, so basically a future M-16, in space.
Harry over at warseer got someone ( I can't remember his name unfortunatly) to sculpt a new face for old Nagash, and it changes the whole look of it, he looks quite menacing now. It looks more like that art work.
5421
Post by: JohnHwangDD
General Seric wrote:JohnHwangDD wrote:Yep, Jes does some great work.
Hacking up the hair is tantamount to heresy, though.
Why does the one on the left have a M-16? the others all have las weapons, but that one has a M-16 (or somthing very close).
That's not a "M-16". It's an Autogun / Stubber slug-thrower. In Necromunda, they use such things, as Las-weapons are rarer and more expensive.
33075
Post by: Mordoskul
Honetly, any first-edition mini could qualify...
26531
Post by: VikingScott
Actually Lasguns are just as easy to find they're just more reliable and expensive. Autoguns are coller and comparing autopistol to laspistol, easier to hit with.
My opinion on worst model has to be anything Nugle. I am just not a fan.
29585
Post by: AvatarForm
JohnHwangDD wrote:
The basic Sisters are very good, aside from the bowl cut hair
While I stand by you on many things, having recently painted the SoB army, I found that many of the 'basic' sculpts were absolute rubbish.
2-part moulds does not make a nice mini.
Neither to details that blend into the body, rather than hold their shape, simply because its easier for the casting process.
If/when GW does a multi-part SoB force, I look forward to some decent minis.
33634
Post by: abaddon=gargamel
My eyes!!
MY EYES!!
5421
Post by: JohnHwangDD
AvatarForm wrote:JohnHwangDD wrote:
The basic Sisters are very good, aside from the bowl cut hair
While I stand by you on many things, having recently painted the SoB army, I found that many of the 'basic' sculpts were absolute rubbish. 2-part moulds does not make a nice mini. Neither to details that blend into the body, rather than hold their shape, simply because its easier for the casting process. If/when GW does a multi-part SoB force, I look forward to some decent minis.
 ( WiP painting) I assume you're nitpicking over the scopes and other casting "fillers"? Or is it something else? I like these models. They're well-posed and purposeful. Not like a Van Carstein in a typical Morley "Y" pose. If/when multi-part Sisters come out, I wouldn't mind getting more to bulk out my army. Heck, I could almost see myself trading new plastic for used metal.
29585
Post by: AvatarForm
JohnHwangDD wrote:
( WiP painting)
I assume you're nitpicking over the scopes and other casting "fillers"?
Or is it something else?
Yes 'fillers' is the most appropriate term...
Gernades and utility belts aside, the Sis Superior in the pic you posted is the mini I despise the most. Look at her robes at the back, arms, legs... actually, look at the chunky, blocky robes that seem to be more filler than anything else. Since you raised the 'Y' pose... Saint Celestine anyone?
27582
Post by: Smarteye
These models really aren't that bad, just GW did really bad highlights making them masculine. I use them as objective counters.
29585
Post by: AvatarForm
Smarteye wrote:These models really aren't that bad, just GW did really bad highlights making them masculine. I use them as objective counters.
Perhaps if you had an Emp Children army...
30024
Post by: A Black Ram
Necroman wrote:chowderhead13 wrote:
The UGLIEST Wargaming model EVER.
I LOVE that model.
Seriously, he has a board with a nail in it in one hand, and a laser gun in the other. What's not to like?
I agree, I myself am very,very fond of it.
What do I like in Scifi RPG's?
-Punks
-Cultists
-Blunt, crude weapons
It's everything I like in one model 
25139
Post by: micahaphone
While the slaanesh horse thingy is very ugly, isn't slaanesh supposed to be about perverse things that only seem beautiful while under Sl's power? Showing moral decadence? Besides, if 3 of those things (roughly 10 feet tall) were charging my line, I'd gak myself. They are kind of creepy/scary, especially when you wonder how they'd look fighting.
13250
Post by: Lord of battles
Smarteye wrote:
AAAAWWWWYYYYYEEEEAAAAAAAA!!!!
21678
Post by: Karon
Asherian Command wrote:chowderhead13 wrote:
The UGLIEST Wargaming model EVER.
Hey look its Senator Mark Kirk!
Exactly the reason why I voted for the Democrat Senator, and the Republican Governor.
31545
Post by: AlexHolker
micahaphone wrote:While the slaanesh horse thingy is very ugly, isn't slaanesh supposed to be about perverse things that only seem beautiful while under Sl's power?
No. That's a cop-out that can and has been used to excuse any old rubbish. "Of course the daemonettes have ugly faces, have only one (covered) breast and ride their Steeds of Slaanesh like dead fish, you're not under the influence of their Slaaneshi magic!"
To me, the ideal for a Slaanesh daemon is something that may or may not be attractive, but looks as if something, somewhere thought it would be, like a divine example of bad market research.
"For some reason, the humans keep running away from the Steed of Slaanesh. What are we doing wrong?"
"Humans like boobs, right? They made the daemonettes more popular. And more boobs means more to like!"
"Brilliant idea!"
*cue boobworm*
29842
Post by: Pen≥Sword
Smarteye wrote:These models really aren't that bad, just GW did really bad highlights making them masculine. I use them as objective counters.
Pimpious Maximus.
27582
Post by: Smarteye
lol, indeed
15799
Post by: terribletrygon
Same ugly models, different ugly paintjob. Brill.
Still putting my money on Nagash.
25139
Post by: micahaphone
AlexHolker wrote:micahaphone wrote:While the slaanesh horse thingy is very ugly, isn't slaanesh supposed to be about perverse things that only seem beautiful while under Sl's power?
No. That's a cop-out that can and has been used to excuse any old rubbish. "Of course the daemonettes have ugly faces, have only one (covered) breast and ride their Steeds of Slaanesh like dead fish, you're not under the influence of their Slaaneshi magic!"
To me, the ideal for a Slaanesh daemon is something that may or may not be attractive, but looks as if something, somewhere thought it would be, like a divine example of bad market research.
"For some reason, the humans keep running away from the Steed of Slaanesh. What are we doing wrong?"
"Humans like boobs, right? They made the daemonettes more popular. And more boobs means more to like!"
"Brilliant idea!"
*cue boobworm*
Okay, but you have to admit, they are freaky looking. `10 foot tall scorpion horse things with anteater mouths charging your gunline?
29034
Post by: Maledictus
Heres a challenge for the truly determined, find a female GW model that does not look like a bad transvestite...
29190
Post by: CURNOW
done !
1
22547
Post by: ChrisCP
Adams apple! And a cod piece, what is this~!
18499
Post by: Henners91
I don't see an Adam's Apple...
Is that the Bretonnian Maiden? I'm not familiar with the model but I was going to suggest it
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
Yes, that is indeed the maiden.
it actually is a nice female model.
27582
Post by: Smarteye
I've allways thought the Maiden was good. Check out some of the Lahmian Vampires as well. The one holding the snake is nice.
31004
Post by: Cadichan Support
JohnHwangDD wrote:
That's not a "M-16". It's an Autogun / Stubber slug-thrower. In Necromunda, they use such things, as Las-weapons are rarer and more expensive.
Lasguns?!?!?!?! Rare!?!!?!
If flashlights are rare i wonder what the stats of those are?
6769
Post by: Tri
Cadichan Support wrote:JohnHwangDD wrote:
That's not a "M-16". It's an Autogun / Stubber slug-thrower. In Necromunda, they use such things, as Las-weapons are rarer and more expensive.
Lasguns?!?!?!?! Rare!?!!?! If flashlights are rare i wonder what the stats of those are?
I play Dark Heresy, and Las-weapons have a lot going for them. You can recharge their packs easily any where; even heating them in a fire works though it does degrade the packs. They also have good range and accuracy, and are easy to repair.
11961
Post by: Ifalna
These things were just.. urgh. I had so many. I dug out my old chaos army and showed them to my friends recently, there were hysterics. Remember the mutation sprue with the giant arms that made no sense and left you with models you could not possibly line up? Or even just trying to work out the skeletal structure needed to pull those poses in that armor while having necks coming out of their mid chest. Fantastic.
11060
Post by: Phototoxin
They were one of the first multi-part kits though..
11961
Post by: Ifalna
Really doesn't change how hideous they are or how long it took for them to get an update that made them look remotely humanoid :(
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
dang, they must have pulled the ork pose concept out of those guys.
4042
Post by: Da Boss
I remember thinking they were cool when they came out, but looking at them now I can only conclude I was insane at the time.
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
Cadichan Support wrote:JohnHwangDD wrote:
That's not a "M-16". It's an Autogun / Stubber slug-thrower. In Necromunda, they use such things, as Las-weapons are rarer and more expensive.
Lasguns?!?!?!?! Rare!?!!?!
If flashlights are rare i wonder what the stats of those are?
it's ok.
in Necromunda Bolters are blast weapons
99
Post by: insaniak
Cadichan Support wrote:JohnHwangDD wrote:That's not a "M-16". It's an Autogun / Stubber slug-thrower. In Necromunda, they use such things, as Las-weapons are rarer and more expensive.
Lasguns?!?!?!?! Rare!?!!?!
If flashlights are rare i wonder what the stats of those are?
It's a comparative thing. Lasguns aren't that rare, but they are more difficult and expensive to produce, which makes solid-ammo auto-weapons a little more common in the Underhive.
in Necromunda Bolters are blast weapons
Is that a recent change? Because they aren't in my rulebook.
7361
Post by: Howard A Treesong
Ifalna wrote:http://www.bluemoonminiatures.com/ChaosWarriorsRegiment1.jpg
These things were just.. urgh. I had so many.
Why did you need a lot? The points costs at 5th edition when these were released were colossal, you could make a 2000 point army with a couple of units some cavalry and a lord. I got a few out recently and painted them up.  And the knights... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v201/howardtreesong/DSCF1825.jpg I quite liked them myself. Brings back memories, these were £10 for a box or 12 I think. It was start of their multipart plastic regiments that have continued to today. They are a bugger to rank up though, but the modern ones look a bit too organised and regular.
11961
Post by: Ifalna
I had a few units with different marks, so for wysiwyg I had more than one unit with different schemes.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
Cadichan Support wrote:JohnHwangDD wrote:
That's not a "M-16". It's an Autogun / Stubber slug-thrower. In Necromunda, they use such things, as Las-weapons are rarer and more expensive.
Lasguns?!?!?!?! Rare!?!!?!
If flashlights are rare i wonder what the stats of those are?
Gameplay difference is a difference in the ammo roll. Lasguns are more reliable and less prone to jamming in the middle of a fight than an autogun. Automatically Appended Next Post: Grey Templar wrote:
in Necromunda Bolters are blast weapons
Not in my rulebook either.
18499
Post by: Henners91
@Ifalna
Nice Dwar-
Oh, wait...
Dear Lord.
26542
Post by: burad
The slaves' faces look like 60-year-olds who have had too much plastic surgery.
Too big implants, and too much nip & tuck too.
Like old porn stars desperately trying to look young.
13173
Post by: Aretak
Like Button
22150
Post by: blood reaper
5470
Post by: sebster
VikingScott wrote:Gameplay difference is a difference in the ammo roll. Lasguns are more reliable and less prone to jamming in the middle of a fight than an autogun.
The lasgun has a -1 save modifier as well.
in Necromunda Bolters are blast weapons
Not in my rulebook either.
He's likely thinking of shotguns firing shot, which used the 1/2" template in the original rules. Something that never affected play once in the decade or so of me playing the game.
207
Post by: Balance
Bolt Weapons are, generally, hard to get in Necromunda, as I remember. Very expensive and running out of ammo on your shiny new bolter was a definite risk. I think I tended to stick with Lasguns and went with numbers over a few guys with better weapons.
22289
Post by: EmilCrane
Anyone else think the new storm raven is butt ugly? Its like the Valkyrie and the Thunderhawk had a slowed child.
31545
Post by: AlexHolker
EmilCrane wrote:Anyone else think the new storm raven is butt ugly? Its like the Valkyrie and the Thunderhawk had a slowed child.
Judging by the five threads across two forums I've seen, I don't think you're alone.
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
EmilCrane wrote:Anyone else think the new storm raven is butt ugly? Its like the Valkyrie and the Thunderhawk had a slowed child.
it's just "Special" and mommy Valk and Daddy Thunderhawk love it very much. 
11254
Post by: veritechc
Grey Templar wrote:EmilCrane wrote:Anyone else think the new storm raven is butt ugly? Its like the Valkyrie and the Thunderhawk had a slowed child.
it's just "Special" and mommy Valk and Daddy Thunderhawk love it very much.
Am I missing something. Did they put out a picture of the Stormraven?
26531
Post by: VikingScott
Not officialy. Someone managed to get the picture as it was accidently on gw's site.
15799
Post by: terribletrygon
VikingScott wrote:Not officialy. Everyone managed to get the picture as it was "accidently" on gw's site.
Fixed that for you.
26531
Post by: VikingScott
That's fair too. But usally they don't reveal anything until it's released.
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
here is the photo for those who are interested
1
18499
Post by: Henners91
It's just too tall and unbalanced, the front is so tall!
686
Post by: aka_mythos
After the beautiful Dark Eldar models I almost joined the cult of "GW can do no wrong," at least model-wise... then I saw the Stormraven and my faith was destroyed.
The simplest things would have been to lower the engines and wings. Replace the turret with a razorbacks' and lose the intake tower.
20243
Post by: Grey Templar
i like that turret, it's really streamlined.
a Razorback turret would stick out like a sore thumb and make it look even more clunky.
35046
Post by: Perkustin
Solar Macharius Is one of the best models ever! The face, staff and bolt pistol, not to mention the scrollwork on his armour, were years ahead of contemparary GW miniatures (1999). The priest with the improvised club is awesome also. To be fair the male metal wyches are actually pretty good, i suggest you take another look. Having seen those tau honour Guard that come with the IMHO cool mobility scooter dude i may have changed my mind on ugliest miniature but my original pick are these. http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat440110a&prodId=prod1550007 I mean how has nobody noticed how S**t these miniatures are!!!! BTW the old plastic gretchin with the pointy hat and blaster is an example of 'good ugly' for those that can't make the distinction.
31272
Post by: Battle Brother Lucifer
Little late, someone already brought it up
15799
Post by: terribletrygon
Perkustin wrote:Solar Macharius Is one of the best models ever! The face, staff and bolt pistol, not to mention the scrollwork on his armour, were years ahead of contemparary GW miniatures (1999). The priest with the improvised club is awesome also. To be fair the male metal wyches are actually pretty good, i suggest you take another look. Having seen those tau honour Guard that come with the IMHO cool mobility scooter dude i may have changed my mind on ugliest miniature but my original pick are these.
http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat440110a&prodId=prod1550007
I mean how has nobody noticed how S**t these miniatures are!!!!
BTW the old plastic gretchin with the pointy hat and blaster is an example of 'good ugly' for those that can't make the distinction.
I actually got some of the Chosen. Without the helmets, they are very, very nice models.
I used them as the basis for my Word Bearer Stormtroopers.
They have really nice armour detail.
35046
Post by: Perkustin
@Terrible trygon the second converted guy is cool i'll admit. However, i stand by my decision; the Legs look horribly static and clogged with stupid tabards, a few of the models appear to be wearing steel toe capped Doc martens, the gauntlets aim for the coolness of the warriors but instead resemble oven mits and the it's the same pose on every model. They're like the old onepiece plastic chaos warrior (the one you used to get with the paint set ~1995) but with none of the retro charm....
31545
Post by: AlexHolker
*gasp*
It's Doctor Doom!
30024
Post by: A Black Ram
We will when you post Chuck Norris space marine.
31272
Post by: Battle Brother Lucifer
A Black Ram wrote:
We will when you post Chuck Norris space marine.
+1
I've bothered him about on 3 threads now
Also, Shrike, that last one wasnt to be mean. People were talking about it already.
31004
Post by: Cadichan Support
OMFG it looks like it is related to slaanesh or nurgle.
31886
Post by: dkellyj
Grey Templar wrote:here is the photo for those who are interested
Oh god my eyes, I'M BLIND.
18499
Post by: Henners91
Here's hoping the Stormraven looks better in person...
26225
Post by: General Seric
Cadichan Support wrote:
OMFG it looks like it is related to slaanesh or nurgle.
It looks like it is dancing
Edit:
this dragon from the collectors range is pretty ugly too:
http://www.games-workshop.com/gws/catalog/productDetail.jsp?catId=cat500025a&prodId=prod1140115
31272
Post by: Battle Brother Lucifer
Farmer wrote:
Once again, a little late. Please check the thread before posting such a glaringly new and talked about model.
25475
Post by: Devastator
17692
Post by: Farmer
battle Brother Lucifer wrote:Farmer wrote:
Once again, a little late. Please check the thread before posting such a glaringly new and talked about model.
Sorry bro, how about no?.
31272
Post by: Battle Brother Lucifer
Farmer wrote:battle Brother Lucifer wrote:Farmer wrote:
Once again, a little late. Please check the thread before posting such a glaringly new and talked about model.
Sorry bro, how about no?.
Looks like you have got a bad case of Internet tough guy
It is no use to post a picture of the same model over and over in a thread.
6769
Post by: Tri
battle Brother Lucifer wrote:Farmer wrote:battle Brother Lucifer wrote:Farmer wrote:
Once again, a little late. Please check the thread before posting such a glaringly new and talked about model.
Sorry bro, how about no?.
Looks like you have got a bad case of Internet tough guy It is no use to post a picture of the same model over and over in a thread.
Yep you'd have to be a fool not to remove the picture and keep commenting on it ^__^ Any way adding to this I've always hated the Daemon hosts .... They just look like the guy squashed what he was doing and was made to finish it.
35046
Post by: Perkustin
Dude that demonhost model is RAD! Its the other one that deserves the scorn...
6769
Post by: Tri
Perkustin wrote:Dude that demonhost model is RAD! Its the other one that deserves the scorn...
If its ok I'll hate both of them
17692
Post by: Farmer
battle Brother Lucifer wrote:Farmer wrote:battle Brother Lucifer wrote:Farmer wrote:
Once again, a little late. Please check the thread before posting such a glaringly new and talked about model.
Sorry bro, how about no?.
Looks like you have got a bad case of Internet tough guy
It is no use to post a picture of the same model over and over in a thread.
Looks like you have a bad case of the mad.
Please learn what a internet tough guy is before you call someone it.
It is no use for you to tell someone what to do on a internet message board, if me posting a picture which has already been posted before is a problem i am sure a mod will contact me, but you aren't a mod, hope i didn't upset you :-)
29669
Post by: omgnowaiii
I was unlucky enough to get given this model.
29585
Post by: AvatarForm
why are people posting pics of models which are INTENDED to be ugly and not just lame sculpts?
320
Post by: Platuan4th
aka_mythos wrote:
The simplest things would have been to lower the engines and wings. Replace the turret with a razorbacks' and lose the intake tower.
That still wouldn't fix the main problem with it: Where the hell is the power source?!
22146
Post by: Saintspirit
I'm quite surprised no one has posted Malekith and Morathi yet.
Heck, almost all the DE sorcerers look bad.
25443
Post by: JSK-Fox
I don't get all the Chosen hate.
They look epic. Also, the BoxRaven actually isn't that bad. It grows on you.
27612
Post by: Black Corsair
Ifalna wrote:
These things were just.. urgh. I had so many. I dug out my old chaos army and showed them to my friends recently, there were hysterics. Remember the mutation sprue with the giant arms that made no sense and left you with models you could not possibly line up? Or even just trying to work out the skeletal structure needed to pull those poses in that armor while having necks coming out of their mid chest. Fantastic.
JAJAJAJ!!! great! the Fantasy Chaos Monkeys or armored Hunchbacks as we called them here!! awfully ugly... but they were the first multi-part kit GW did... i'm wrong?
7361
Post by: Howard A Treesong
Black Corsair wrote:JAJAJAJ!!! great! the Fantasy Chaos Monkeys or armored Hunchbacks as we called them here!! awfully ugly... but they were the first multi-part kit GW did... i'm wrong?
Of the current style of regiment boxes starting around 1998 they were. The first multi-part skeletons and Marines came well before these though.
34899
Post by: Eumerin
Saintspirit wrote:I'm quite surprised no one has posted Malekith and Morathi yet.
Heck, almost all the DE sorcerers look bad.
Malekith is bad. The dragon doesn't help, imo.
But the only problem that I have with the mounted Morathi model is the horrible fit of all the various parts. I like the figure itself. I also like the other Dark Elf sorceress models - particularly the two new ones. Though of course someone needs to smack GW regarding the fact that there are now TWO sorceress models mounted on Cold Ones (and therefore subject to Stupidity tests) and none mounted on Dark Steeds (which not only avoid Stupidity, but also move faster). For some inexplicable reason, GW decided to ignore the way that everyone runs a mounted sorceress and instead use the method that no one uses.
36886
Post by: josefbugman
Beastmen
20986
Post by: AG09
I thought it was some dodgy Toys 'r' Us toy at first. Embarrassing for GW haha.
22146
Post by: Saintspirit
josefbugman wrote:Beastmen
Oh! You did NOT just say that!
Or what, do you mean pumba? Then I can agree with you.
27612
Post by: Black Corsair
Saintspirit wrote:josefbugman wrote:Beastmen
Oh! You did NOT just say that!
Or what, do you mean pumba? Then I can agree with you.
i think he means the old range of metal beastmen.... especially the ungors.... 
22146
Post by: Saintspirit
Oh yeah, they were indeed quite ugly. Though I don't mind the old ungors, more likely the old minos and characters.
34605
Post by: spireland
A lot of these models I like. I guess I have poor taste. Though I have to agree with the DE slaves. Terrible.
|
|
fficial%26biw%3D1920%26bih%3D887%26tbs%3Disch:1&um=1&itbs=1&iact=