33033
Post by: kenshin620
Well looks like the infamous greatcoats are finally getting their new set. But since its WGF, YMMV
Imo the gunner looks kidna funny (I prefer the GW heavy weapon poses) and the gun looks so.......blocky and plain
but news is news, and I'm sure there are those here who dont mind them and would like cheaper alts
Our Shock Trooper Heavy Weapons box set is getting closer to release! Below is a 3D preview of the re-designed Heavy Energy Cannon as many fans and customers requested!
We’ll be releasing them as soon as we approve the samples that are in rout to us now and get them painted. Set comes with 3-heavy weapons crew (2-per weapon) and 3-officers. The set includes 9-model infantry and heavy weapons to make 3-each of the following – Missile Launcher, Energy Cannon, Mortar, Heavy Chain Gun. That way you can arm your teams however you like and have lots of bits left over. This set will come with bases and retail for $19.95 USD.
In addition to re-designing the Heavy Energy Cannon we've:
Replaced the squatting position for "sitting" legs that will work with all torsos.
Re-proportioned the bodies to better match our existing Shock Troopers.
Included classic Shock Trooper torsos, heads and arms. (We're also keeping many of the new torsos and heads for those who liked them.)
The front tripod leg has been removed and replaced with one that matches the other legs.
Removed the "hand" insignia from helmets.
and many more tweaks based on your feedback!
We hope you enjoy the preview!
http://www.wargamesfactory.com/announcements/3d-shock-trooper-heavy-weapons-preview
9394
Post by: Malika2
Sorry to say this but I'm not impressed...
6872
Post by: sourclams
What's up with Darth Vader and his tiny little baby legs?
22150
Post by: blood reaper
The Gunners position is quite strange and the mounted gun isn't that cool, it's quite square and looks like the Games Workshop model and would make an okay Steel Legion replacement.
35350
Post by: BuFFo
Wow.... it is rare I ever say this about miniatures because I like just about all miniatures, but that is one fugly model. Holy christ....
15115
Post by: Brother SRM
Significantly better than the last preview; I'm not blown away but they're serviceable.
20085
Post by: NoseGoblin
Agree with above, the legs look too short and the spacing between the legs makes it look just wrong... looks like he's wearing a diaper
666
Post by: Necros
It looks like someone choped his legs off at the knee, then added shoes so no one would notice. Like that old Dorf guy
8742
Post by: MeanGreenStompa
Holy Smokes! It's Cotton Hill, back from the dead!
Seriously that 3d model is utterly terrible.
2764
Post by: AgeOfEgos
First thing I thought of when I saw his head/torso/leg length ratio;
Hopefully they take that one back to the drawing board.
30532
Post by: Zefig
Yeah, that's a LOT better than the earlier preview. At least the gun doesn't have inexplicable bathtub claw feet. And the gunner doesn't look like he's doing a latrine squat.
Now he only looks like he's a toddler.
33033
Post by: kenshin620
My thoughts exactly on the "baby" look. There must be some type of mutation from the local populace causing these deformities
And for those with an ounce of hope of any more changes, sorry these designs are FINAL
4514
Post by: Myrthe
Oh wow .... (and not in a good way) !!!
The legs look like they belong to a trooper that would be sitting behind this one to hold up his legless body as he shoots !!!
Jeesh, it looks like he's about to give birth or something !!
And that gun ... aside from being huge and less-than-portable, it looks like someone stuck some plumbing to the front of a restroom condom machine !!!
22190
Post by: Theduke07
Sitting instead of the classic one knee squat is pretty lame
19650
Post by: shingouki
It's not terrible imo but maybe having the gunner kneeling might have looked a little less lame.
11
Post by: ph34r
Well, now instead of looking Full slow, they just look bland. That's a plus I guess. Props for listening to the criticism on their original terrible design choices, but a wag of the finger to them for making those ridiculous choices in the first place.
4042
Post by: Da Boss
That's very disappointing!
21499
Post by: Mr. Burning
Shock Trooper indeed.
That doesn't look comfortable.
Can baby greatcoat see his target, what with that massive blocky gun blocking his view?
Could that be some kind of sight on the left hand side of the gun?
I like the idea of WGF shock troops but some of the execution is...lacking.
38451
Post by: Guildsman
Holy... wow. Just, wow. Where to start? Out of proportion legs, a decidedly not man-portable gun with an ugly design... the list goes on and on. How do they move that gun? A crane?
29190
Post by: CURNOW
All the troopers with adult size legs are in the assault squads ! And all the ones with "strong legs " are given the sit down jobs
4010
Post by: Delephont
Yeah, but check out the comments on the WGF website, it's all positive.....so my guess is that this "figure" is gonna get made!
99
Post by: insaniak
Yeah, a kneeling pose would have worked better. That just looks awkward.
And I can't even imagine what they were thinking with that weapon. Looks more like something cobbled together by Macguyver than an actual functional weapon.
25300
Post by: Absolutionis
The legs don't look so stubby if you view them from another angle. The gunner himself looks fine and fits with the rest of the line (which is currently 1 product).
I'm happy they ditched the inexplicable skeletal leg. I'm not a fan of the crate-gun. It seems like a fine buy.
These WGF models are supposed to be bland, generic, and cheap. I like them this way. They're quintessential 'bad guys' in RPGs.
However, I do hope that these models don't come with annoying molded bases.
7433
Post by: plastictrees
They've found a sculptor that's pioneering bold new ways for humans to sit!
No-one is ever in that position unless they're giving birth or vigorously working their way through the kama sutra.
33033
Post by: kenshin620
Delephont wrote:Yeah, but check out the comments on the WGF website, it's all positive.....so my guess is that this "figure" is gonna get made!
They control the site
They control the comment box
9922
Post by: The Grundel
That heavy weapon and pose are too sexual for my liking hahaha
4042
Post by: Da Boss
I went and looked on the site. The legs look way too short whatever way you slice it.
677
Post by: precinctomega
OK, I can see that part of the problem is that this is an isometric layout, so the legs - which are really only a little bit too short - look shorter than they really are from this angle.
And yes, the gun does have a screen.
But still, seriously, this is just working one stupid-looking design into another design that's exactly as stupid-looking as the original but in a completely different way.
I've been holding out hope for the new WGF in faith that they would rise above an inauspicious start to deliver credible plastic alternatives.
i wouldn't say that hope is dead, but it's certainly clutching its chest and gesturing desperately for passers-by to ring for an ambulance.
R.
24364
Post by: CrazyThang
precinctomega wrote:OK, I can see that part of the problem is that this is an isometric layout, so the legs - which are really only a little bit too short - look shorter than they really are from this angle.
And yes, the gun does have a screen.
But still, seriously, this is just working one stupid-looking design into another design that's exactly as stupid-looking as the original but in a completely different way.
I've been holding out hope for the new WGF in faith that they would rise above an inauspicious start to deliver credible plastic alternatives.
i wouldn't say that hope is dead, but it's certainly clutching its chest and gesturing desperately for passers-by to ring for an ambulance.
R.
But if you look at the full 3D preview on the site, a new angle really doesn't help those legs.
35006
Post by: Medium of Death
10072
Post by: Centurionpainting
When I tried to order a box of the regular guys it said it cost around $30.00 USD for shipping. Do you guys get the same price (shipping to US-East Coast)? Seems a little steep for 18 guys of non-GW sculpting quality..
4042
Post by: Da Boss
IRC you get 18 dudes in that kit, not 10.
7375
Post by: BrookM
They're back in business full time again then?
299
Post by: Kilkrazy
The legs do look pretty crappy from this angle.
Why not something longer?
The problem with the gun is that it is so very large and so lacking any detail. If the designer puts that many large flat surfaces on something they need a bot of relief.
518
Post by: Kid_Kyoto
As I've said before I like the Greatcoats, what they lack in detail they make up for in options and they're just a joy to work on.
And frankly next to the cartoony Catachans and the dull Cadians I don't really think there is a quality difference.
Now these... these... let's just say I'll wait to see the finished product.
4042
Post by: Da Boss
That's a great idea.
24364
Post by: CrazyThang
Kid_Kyoto wrote:As I've said before I like the Greatcoats, what they lack in detail they make up for in options and they're just a joy to work on.
And frankly next to the cartoony Catachans and the dull Cadians I don't really think there is a quality difference.
Now these... these... let's just say I'll wait to see the finished product.
As has been mentioned, isn't THIS the final product?
33033
Post by: kenshin620
Well technically this is a 3D render, not the actual model
however the current designs according to them are final
At least PSC has some plastic 28mm heavy weapons that dont look too silly
17152
Post by: Andrew1975
So close yet so far away. They always miss by such a small fraction that I was really hoping for better.
24364
Post by: CrazyThang
kenshin620 wrote:Well technically this is a 3D render, not the actual model
however the current designs according to them are final
At least PSC has some plastic 28mm heavy weapons that dont look too silly
Yes, that is what I meant
21499
Post by: Mr. Burning
I guess I will reserve judgement when I see these guys in the flesh.
Lets be honest it won't take too much effort to make a better weapon, At least it could be converted into some sort of anti tank weapon or future heavy manpad.
518
Post by: Kid_Kyoto
I want to see what's on the sprues. A few intersting guns or heads will make the difference between buy or pass.
9389
Post by: lord marcus
Quick question: is shipping still screwed up or can i safely order these without loosing my money?
33033
Post by: kenshin620
I dont know about their site itself, to be on the safe side I always use online retailers like warstore who have good reputation
41290
Post by: Maxim C. Gatling
I'm sorry. I liked the Greatcoats. I didn't like that the weapons were attached, but otherwise it was a great kit for the price.
THIS turd, however, is a butt-fugly miniature. The proportions aren't right and it breaks rule #1, it's BORING. The gun is mind-numbingly boxy and lackluster. I hope they don't embarrass themselves by putting that render into production.
Shock Trooper...it's Shockingly Bad Trooper with Snore Cannon.
29190
Post by: CURNOW
I'm sorry they just look like pound store space men ! Not good they need to take lessons from AOW on how to do great looking and quality sculpts .
41290
Post by: Maxim C. Gatling
Don't get me wrong. I love when companies like this put out alternative product. But this looks like they're trying to "play it safe". The Baby-Legs are unforgivable though.
33248
Post by: SkaerKrow
The problem isn't that the legs are too short, the problem is that they're pulled backwards to an almost impossible angle. Hopefully they're rework them before they get sent off for mold making. Thankfully they didn't go with the awful concept drawings that they had done previously. I might have mined that kit for bits for my Greatcoats, but it was still really hokey looking.
Edit: No, I take it back. The legs are a bit too small.
8907
Post by: cadbren
kenshin620 wrote:
Larger legs and wheels instead of a tripod would make this model so much better.
519
Post by: Noble713
Theduke07 wrote:Sitting instead of the classic one knee squat is pretty lame Lame? By what criteria? "Rule of Cool", I take it? Sitting <text redacted; do NOT attempt to evade the profanity filter --Janthkin> behind a crew-served weapon is comfortable, and if you throw your feet on or over the the tripod it helps support the weapon as well (every bit counts!). That being said, this model is a step below "Meh." Fix the legs and weapon.
41664
Post by: ShatteredBlade
I keep trying to cut this thing slack, I'm trying not to rip into it. But, it's just..bad.
3933
Post by: Kingsley
Better than the normal Greatcoats, but still very "budget" looking.
33248
Post by: SkaerKrow
Fetterkey wrote:Better than the normal Greatcoats, but still very "budget" looking.
How do you figure it to be better than the original Greatcoat release? It's the same model, but with slightly emaciated legs. Do you just hate legs or something?
I know that people give the cannon some grief, but I actually really like it. It looks like a piece of military hardware, more realistic and less toy-like (though it could stand to have a couple of extra details added just for good measure). For those keeping score, Wargames Factory has indicated that they are including some of the bits from the original heavy weapon renders in the new kit, and that this concept art represents the final product as it will be released. Essentially, this is the kit that we're getting, no changes. I actually don't have any need for this kit (I bashed together WGF Shock Troopers and 40k Cadian Weapons Teams for my army), but I'll end up snagging a few just to flesh out my collection and support the Shock Trooper miniatures range.
6145
Post by: Gitkikka
Definite improvement over the first heavy weapon concept pictures. Doesn't mean it's good. My orks might like the gun though.
Edit: On the other hand, I've been looking at the WF greatcoat troopers as a traitor guard source - the short legs could be a mutation.
115
Post by: Azazelx
The weapon looks like the kind of things kids in Primary School make out of boxes and cardboard tubes. I'm sure the Greatcoats' mums will be very impressed.
3933
Post by: Kingsley
SkaerKrow wrote:Fetterkey wrote:Better than the normal Greatcoats, but still very "budget" looking.
How do you figure it to be better than the original Greatcoat release? It's the same model, but with slightly emaciated legs. Do you just hate legs or something? 
The weird legs here are still better than the ludicrous coat billow physics (or lack thereof) on the original Greatcoats.
518
Post by: Kid_Kyoto
Some new info from TMP
http://theminiaturespage.com/news/150409/
We've just posted a 3D-view of our new Shock Trooper Heavy Energy Cannon and gunner on our website (this will be how the final model looks unpainted). Come check it out!
We'll be releasing them as soon as we approve the samples that are in route to us now and get them painted. Set comes with three heavy weapons crew (two per weapon) and three officers. The set includes nine model infantry and heavy weapons to make three each of the following - Missile Launcher, Energy Cannon, Mortar, Heavy Chain Gun. That way, you can arm your teams however you like, and have lots of bits left over.
This set will come with bases and retail for $19.95 USD.
It's the same picture with the same stubby legs but I hold out hope it's an optical illusion or that it was corrected. If not I can always use standing troopers I guess.
No autocannon which is a shame even though that may be the easiest to kitbash up.
Still for $20 this set is bound to have enough useful bitz for most players.
14152
Post by: CT GAMER
So what if the gun is subpar: Who is using these guys without swapping out weapons for GW weapon bits?
207
Post by: Balance
Kilkrazy wrote:The legs do look pretty crappy from this angle.
Why not something longer?
The problem with the gun is that it is so very large and so lacking any detail. If the designer puts that many large flat surfaces on something they need a bot of relief.
Possibly stupid question: Is the 'sitting on butt, legs stretched out in front' historically accurate, as in a position gunners of similar weapons were trained to use at some point? I know I sit like that when I need to work on something low to the ground, but I'm kind of lazy at times, move slow, and rarely get shot at. It doesn't look very 'actiony' or heroic... Most war movies seem to focus on guys firing similar weapons either crouched down or flat on their stomach.
But I won't be surprised if it is or was the standard, recommended firing pose.
(This is aimed at Killkrazy's Copplestone Castings link.)
33033
Post by: kenshin620
CT GAMER wrote:So what if the gun is subpar
Its not just the gun, its the man behind it
edit to answer balance
well google gave me these pics
35046
Post by: Perkustin
It MIGHT be the angle of the pic.
I quite like the 'gauss cannon' looking gun.
45100
Post by: Hexol
Balance wrote:Kilkrazy wrote:The legs do look pretty crappy from this angle.
Why not something longer?
The problem with the gun is that it is so very large and so lacking any detail. If the designer puts that many large flat surfaces on something they need a bot of relief.
Possibly stupid question: Is the 'sitting on butt, legs stretched out in front' historically accurate, as in a position gunners of similar weapons were trained to use at some point? I know I sit like that when I need to work on something low to the ground, but I'm kind of lazy at times, move slow, and rarely get shot at. It doesn't look very 'actiony' or heroic... Most war movies seem to focus on guys firing similar weapons either crouched down or flat on their stomach.
But I won't be surprised
(This is aimed at Killkrazy's Copplestone Castings link.)
Looks like it's historically accurate for tripod mounted heavy machine guns such as the Browning .50 caliber machine gun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cal50_Browning_2REI_2.jpg.JPG
From what I saw searching Google for those types of tripods, the gunners were either sitting in some way similar to the model, or standing in a trench. Looks like it would be the only comfortable way to hold the gun steady and be able to look down the barrel. But maybe someone else has a better understanding or explanation.
7942
Post by: nkelsch
Looks like 'pooping in a hole' sitting is the real world way to shoot one of these tripod guns from a ground tripod.
The old GW ones had them in chairs which is a similar pose.
41365
Post by: DaemonJellybaby
see, just give him a GS bag to sit on, a few minor changes and he is fine, there will also be other guns in the pack! (there had better be!)
17349
Post by: SilverMK2
The gunner looks like he is giving birth and his legs are coming out of the sides of his stomach, rather than his hips
I thought the regular infantry were fugly, but I think this has to be one of the most horrifically bad models I have ever seen.
39827
Post by: scarletsquig
The pose was never an issue, but the length of the legs definitely is.
It looks way too much like someone with dwarfism, the proportions are all off.
Wargames Factory have never produced the best of sculpts, and that situation looks set to get even worse now that they've had a hostile takeover by some jackass who stole the company and fired their old sculptor and replaced him with some talentless Zbrush monkey.
The old sculptor did the original shock troops which were at least half decent... these are just horrible, no sense of design or coherence to their weaponry, no attention to proportion or anatomy, the detail is blobby and they just horrible, horrible sculpts.
I find it funny that some of the same people I've seen ripping on mantic in other threads are now posting here in this one defending this abomination of a sculpt.
22017
Post by: Olaf the Hairy
Is that how you sit with a broken pelvis?
207
Post by: Balance
scarletsquig wrote:I find it funny that some of the same people I've seen ripping on mantic in other threads are now posting here in this one defending this abomination of a sculpt. 
Design is subjective. I've noticed a lot of people are so used to the Games Workshop 'style' and proportions that more realistic minis look 'wrong' to them. It takes a while to get past the large hands and tons of bling sometimes.
Of course, both bling-heavy and bling-lite are valid styles. 40k is a very different setting from, say, Infinity and both should have a very different design philosophy. WGF is going for a weird kind of 'fits in with GW' path.
These don't do anything for me, but I'm burned out on GW's quasi-gothic look so I'm not really a great person to ask in this case.  Is till kind of wish I had ordered the parts* to make some Steel Legion into Stormtroopers when I had the chance and GW had a bitz service. Automatically Appended Next Post: * Parts would've included a box of Steel legion, a couple more trooper/special weapon minis, 10+ pairs of metal SM Shoulder Pads (using the smaller ones, maybe a couple of the old fancy ones for the squad leader) and a bunch of the old stormtrooper or kasrkin backpacks.
7433
Post by: plastictrees
scarletsquig wrote:The pose was never an issue, but the length of the legs definitely is.
Sorry, the pose is as big an issue for me as the leg length. Even with normal legs nobody sits like that.
26225
Post by: General Seric
I am not impressed with these, and I was waiting for these to finish off my infantry platoon using WGF Shock Troopers. I want to see pictures of the other weapons though.
plastictrees wrote:scarletsquig wrote:The pose was never an issue, but the length of the legs definitely is.
Sorry, the pose is as big an issue for me as the leg length. Even with normal legs nobody sits like that.
History and the rest of the thread disagree with you...
kenshin620 wrote:CT GAMER wrote:So what if the gun is subpar
Its not just the gun, its the man behind it
edit to answer balance
well google gave me these pics
Hexol wrote:
Looks like it's historically accurate for tripod mounted heavy machine guns such as the Browning .50 caliber machine gun. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Cal50_Browning_2REI_2.jpg.JPG
From what I saw searching Google for those types of tripods, the gunners were either sitting in some way similar to the model, or standing in a trench. Looks like it would be the only comfortable way to hold the gun steady and be able to look down the barrel. But maybe someone else has a better understanding or explanation.
Edit:
Just noticed this posted on the comments on their site:
Wargames Factory commented on
06-Jul-2011 08:10 PM
Our head of design is reworking the legs.
It seems that the negative comments did get through!
99
Post by: insaniak
There's nothing wrong with having the gunner sitting behind the weapon. It's the execution of it in this particular instance that is lacking.
7433
Post by: plastictrees
General Seric wrote:
History and the rest of the thread disagree with you...
Umm, if you're looking at those pictures and think that any of them are sitting the same way as this model then I really don't know how to respond.
33248
Post by: SkaerKrow
plastictrees wrote:Umm, if you're looking at those pictures and think that any of them are sitting the same way as this model then I really don't know how to respond.
How about with "You're right, they are sitting the same way, it's just that the sculpt makes the pose look completely unnatural because of how small the models' legs are in relation to the rest of their body"?
Funny that WGF indicated that no more changes would be made to the model, and yet now they're redesigning the legs.  Glad to hear it though, as I want them to progress as a model company and refine the quality of their sculpts.
518
Post by: Kid_Kyoto
SkaerKrow wrote:plastictrees wrote:Umm, if you're looking at those pictures and think that any of them are sitting the same way as this model then I really don't know how to respond.
How about with "You're right, they are sitting the same way, it's just that the sculpt makes the pose look completely unnatural because of how small the models' legs are in relation to the rest of their body"?
Funny that WGF indicated that no more changes would be made to the model, and yet now they're redesigning the legs.  Glad to hear it though, as I want them to progress as a model company and refine the quality of their sculpts.
THe main reason I liked the old owners so much is that they actively worked wtih customers to make products we would like. Now maybe they listened too much and certainly they should've listened to me more  but they did. They put up concept art, they tweeked things, they completely redesigned things.
Imagine if GW had shown off the plastic Cadians or Catachans before making them? And listened to feedback. How much better would they be?
So I'm glad to hear comments on the legs did get through, maybe the new owners aren't half bad.
33033
Post by: kenshin620
Kid_Kyoto wrote:
Imagine if GW had shown off the plastic Cadians or Catachans before making them? And listened to feedback. How much better would they be?
GW did have an official forum once I believe
Its not there anymore
518
Post by: Kid_Kyoto
kenshin620 wrote:Kid_Kyoto wrote:
Imagine if GW had shown off the plastic Cadians or Catachans before making them? And listened to feedback. How much better would they be?
GW did have an official forum once I believe
Its not there anymore
I have a WD from the 80s where they solicited for play testers.
13937
Post by: BrassScorpion
Machine gun practice in the military is indeed done sitting on the ground. I was converting some IG heavy weapon teams a few years ago and the friend and hobbyist sitting next to me, who is a US Army veteran, pointed out that fact as a modeling suggestion for my weapon team conversions. Because of the limitations of the leg modeling on Cadian Heavy Weapon team miniatures I converted my gunner to sit on a sandbag because it required less extreme converting, but actual MG practice is done sitting on the ground and that fact was good inspiration for what was for me one of my more fun conversions that year.
17152
Post by: Andrew1975
To me it just seams like a kneeling pose would be better, maybe not more accurate, but better.
This guy is classic
666
Post by: Necros
Sitting is prolly more comfy, but I don't think our plastic army men care about being comfortable.
I prefer the 1 knee look like the IG heavy weapon teams
2548
Post by: jmurph
Kneeling is more associated with AT guns than MGs. And the two weapons systems perform very differently. But the crews models are designed to be used with both- so you can have sitting AT gunners or kneeling MGs- neither make much sense.
13937
Post by: BrassScorpion
Kneeling is what a lot of Warhammer fans are used to from the Games Workshop Heavy Weapon team sprues, but it's not accurate, at least not for machine gunners.
4869
Post by: ShumaGorath
I never would of thought that the lazy slobs in the 40k community would hate sitting this much. I'm floored.
99
Post by: insaniak
BrassScorpion wrote:Kneeling is what a lot of Warhammer fans are used to from the Games Workshop Heavy Weapon team sprues, but it's not accurate, at least not for machine gunners.
Yeah, historically, laser cannon operators were more often sitting than kneeling...
4869
Post by: ShumaGorath
Or big boxy featureless guns that make little sense from an operational standpoint. This isn't the wargames community I've grown to tolerate at all! Who are you people? Where did all the Chimera loving, space marine proportion defending, WARMACHINE playing people that used to populate this forum go? Since when did you all care about proportion and visual logic as much as me? The stick in the mud?
13937
Post by: BrassScorpion
Yeah, historically, laser cannon operators were more often sitting than kneeling...
My quote specified machine gunners. There was a discussion about machine gunners, my comment was about machine gunners. My comment was relevant to what it specified. I never mentioned laser cannons nor tried to apply the one thing to the other directly, though the discussion was also about adding an atmosphere of realism to the fantasy model, in which case then a sitting pose would add an air of authenticity by modeling the fantasy weapons team after actual soldiers firing heavy machine guns. That was also part of the hobby discussion here. No reason to be smarmy, especially for someone who is supposed to be helping to keep the forum civil. Sure laser cannon operators can do head stands while firing their weapons, but modeling them after some actual soldiers makes gives them an air of plausibility which even fantasy modelers tend to like. Moving on (and out of this thread completely)... ------------------------------------------------- You can check out some of my conversions done for variety here: http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2009/05/40k-hobby-converting-imperial-guard.html Sitting, kneeling and prone poses done for visual interest and variety:
99
Post by: insaniak
And my comment was meant to illustrate that in a science fantasy setting, historical precedence isn't particularly relevant.
4869
Post by: ShumaGorath
insaniak wrote:And my comment was meant to illustrate that in a science fantasy setting, historical precedence isn't particularly relevant. No, but it helps to ground things in reality, especially when the two things being compared are fundamentally the same. That laser canon doesn't come with a chair and I assume he isn't shooting it in space. Without logical purpose going against logical precedent and historical accuracy is done simply for the sake of being different. Sometimes it works out great with new technologies or ideas requiring a fundamental reconsidering of human behavior. When a world war two machine gun shoots a laser instead then thats not really the case. The dude should be sitting because otherwise he's going to injure himself by kneeling for hours on rough ground. Using 40k as the precedent for the way "Things should be done" is more often wrong then not. Historically 40k sculpts and designs have been done by people who have no idea what the hell they are sculpting. This is how we got tanks that can't go over curbs, boots the size of torsos, and laser guns with silencers.
99
Post by: insaniak
Actually, I think the kneeling heavy weapon troopers are one of GW's better design decisions. Yes, they may not be as historically accurate... but they're more interchangeable with the rest of the plastic Guard sets than they would have been if they were sitting, and those same legs work for all of the heavy weapons. Sitting legs wouldn't have made a lot of sense for the mortar, for example.
So I would think that the choice to have them kneeling was as much for practicality as anything.
Or maybe they tried the sitting pose, wound up with something that looked vaguely like WGF's effort here, and decided to go for something that didn't look as silly...
4869
Post by: ShumaGorath
Or maybe they tried the sitting pose, wound up with something that looked vaguely like WGF's effort here, and decided to go for something that didn't look as silly... Other then the legs being 30% too short I don't think it looks silly at all. He has better control of the weapon while sitting and doesn't look like he's about to ask the gun to marry him. This looks silly. This is just wrongly proportioned. Lets be real though, the IG themselves are wrongly porportioned and bad looking. The HW teams aren't particularly good examples of GWs sculpting talent. Everyone is in the same kneeling position (that for several of those weapons makes no sense). Everyone is shouting. Everyone is pointing. Everyone has huge hands and huge heads. If you look closely enough, the missile doesn't even fit in the damn missile launcher.
99
Post by: insaniak
It's not just the proportions. The spine is too straight for the legs to be lifted that high. He should be leaning back with his spine curved a little.
4869
Post by: ShumaGorath
insaniak wrote:It's not just the proportions. The spine is too straight for the legs to be lifted that high. He should be leaning back with his spine curved a little.
You need to work on your posture. His spine doesn't need a cubicle workers slump to make sense in a sitting position. He's not cross legged, the legs provide ample leverage for him to sit straight enough to see over his laserbox.
99
Post by: insaniak
ShumaGorath wrote: His spine doesn't need a cubicle workers slump to make sense in a sitting position.
I'm not talking about being slumped. I'm talking about the fact that unless he is uncommonly flexible, having his knees up that high would require him to roll his hips back, which in turn results in the spine curving forwards in order to sit upright.
It's a possible pose. It just doesn't look right because for most people it would be either impossible or extremely uncomfortable.
4869
Post by: ShumaGorath
insaniak wrote:ShumaGorath wrote: His spine doesn't need a cubicle workers slump to make sense in a sitting position.
I'm not talking about being slumped. I'm talking about the fact that unless he is uncommonly flexible, having his knees up that high would require him to roll his hips back, which in turn results in the spine curving forwards in order to sit upright.
It's a possible pose. It just doesn't look right because for most people it would be either impossible or extremely uncomfortable.
Sitting on my bed I managed that pose no problem. I am not a gymnast. It looks overly difficult because his legs are short, it makes it seem like his hips are doing something unnatural. They aren't. His legs are just too small.
43599
Post by: gicks30
ShumaGorath wrote:
This looks silly.
I like Yarrick. What's wrong with him?
OT: They can fix the legs but they still need to fix the boring box-gun.
4869
Post by: ShumaGorath
gicks30 wrote:ShumaGorath wrote: This looks silly. I like Yarrick. What's wrong with him? OT: They can fix the legs but they still need to fix the boring box-gun. He's a frail old man holding a 400 pound claw at his elbow and extending it several feet out. In his other hand he has a 100 pound storm bolter. It's ridiculous looking. It's world of warcraftian.
99
Post by: insaniak
ShumaGorath wrote:Sitting on my bed I managed that pose no problem.
I rather doubt that, frankly. You might have managed what you thought was the same pose, but I would be willing to bet your spine wasn't that straight.
Not that it particularly matters. When you're talking aesthetics, whether or not the pose is possible is completely secondary to the fact that it looks unnatural. Automatically Appended Next Post: ShumaGorath wrote:He's a frail old man...
Hardly.
holding a 400 pound claw
Where is the weight of Yarrick's claw noted?
It's ridiculous looking. It's world of warcraftian.
It's par for the course for 40K, and pretty much every other scifi game currently in existence.
4869
Post by: ShumaGorath
I rather doubt that, frankly. You might have managed what you thought was the same pose, but I would be willing to bet your spine wasn't that straight.
I'm willing to bet you don't do kinematics for a living.
Hardly.
As modeled he appears to be pretty decrepit. Y'know, aside from the engine block on his arm.
Where is the weight of Yarrick's claw noted?
It's a solid chunk of metal the size of an oil drum.
It's par for the course for 40K, and pretty much every other scifi game currently in existence.
Not that it particularly matters. When you're talking aesthetics, whether or not the pose is possible is completely secondary to the fact that it looks unnatural.
You make this too easy.
99
Post by: insaniak
ShumaGorath wrote:
I'm willing to bet you don't do kinematics for a living.
I'm willing to bet that WGF soldier doesn't either.
Note how the knees on that guy in your picture are much lower down than the trooper's.
It's par for the course for 40K, and pretty much every other scifi game currently in existence.
Not that it particularly matters. When you're talking aesthetics, whether or not the pose is possible is completely secondary to the fact that it looks unnatural.
You make this too easy.
Not really sure what point you're making. WGF's scifi miniatures so far suffer just as much from the giant weapon aesthetic as GW's do.
8907
Post by: cadbren
ShumaGorath wrote:Or maybe they tried the sitting pose, wound up with something that looked vaguely like WGF's effort here, and decided to go for something that didn't look as silly...
Other than the legs being 30% too short
'Then' is a completely different word to 'than', it's like confusing 'there' with 'they're' (short for they are).
As for the kneeling legs, they give a sense of action that the sitting pose does not. I get the impression that these guys could pack up their weapon quickly and move elsewhere whereas the sitting guy looks like he's settled down and isn't going anywhere in a hurry. Both are useful.
25300
Post by: Absolutionis
Here it is painted:
31545
Post by: AlexHolker
Nice angle; it completely hides both the featureless block at the back of the gun, and how short his thighs are.
38451
Post by: Guildsman
And against all odds, they make it look worse. I have to agree, that angle completely hides the lack of detail on the back of the gun and the gunner's ridiculous legs. That just comes off as borderline deceptive. Does anyone know if they actually implemented the changes that they promised earlier in the thread?
15076
Post by: fire4effekt
what an ugly model, CAD just doesnt help here.
33248
Post by: SkaerKrow
That almost looks like a painting, not a photograph of painted models. Thanks for sharing, hopefully they'll get some sprue images up soon.
33033
Post by: kenshin620
Looks like a poster of a 50's sci fi flick
Doesnt really make the model look all that much better.
A bit off topic, I actually find it really funny a company would rather use Facebook to put up their news/up coming projects than their own official site
99
Post by: insaniak
SkaerKrow wrote:That almost looks like a painting, not a photograph of painted models.
I suspect it's a digital painting of the original render.
207
Post by: Balance
It looks kind of 'squished.' I know it's a sci-fi weapon, but I think my expectations are that the rear end of a gun should be more of an elongated shape in-line with the barrel.
Making the image 120% wider would also make the legs look better, I guess.
8907
Post by: cadbren
I think the weapon looks fine, box and all. It's the legs that concern me. I assume they didn't get a model in a long coat to sit on the floor to work out the dimensions of this thing before they started.
45408
Post by: adhuin
Absolutionis wrote:Here it is painted:

3 heavy weapons, 6 crew and 2 commanders? I assume there isn't any HW-options as they aren't mentioned.
Even GW HW box gives more value with its 15 hw options that can be stretched to 15 hw teams with spare men and some fixin'.
I think I know which HW:s my Space Nazis will be using.
33248
Post by: SkaerKrow
adhuin wrote:Absolutionis wrote:Here it is painted:

3 heavy weapons, 6 crew and 2 commanders? I assume there isn't any HW-options as they aren't mentioned.
Even GW HW box gives more value with its 15 hw options that can be stretched to 15 hw teams with spare men and some fixin'.
I think I know which HW:s my Space Nazis will be using.
Your assessment doesn't take into account the budget price point that WGF releases their figures at, or the fact that you should receive enough weapons in the Greatcoat kit that you will still come up with extra weapons (just as you do with the GW kit).
45408
Post by: adhuin
You mean this heavy weapon kit, or the original greatcoat troopers?
The original greatcoats were great and I have about 100 of of them. Extra poses from crew/commander are nice, but I'm more looking forward arming them with lot of heavy weaponry.
Assuming this costs same as greatcoat troopers (~16e+) and GW HW cadian box is (~24e+), then it should have at least 3x3 heavy weapons to match the quantity per euro. (using maelstroms prices as reference).
(edit: I'm not defending GW:s general price levels, but HW boxes are unbelievably good deals, when compared to any other gw products)
99
Post by: insaniak
adhuin wrote:3 heavy weapons, 6 crew and 2 commanders? I assume there isn't any HW-options as they aren't mentioned.
It has a box with a pipe sticking out of it, that shoots fire. Why would you need any other options?
42880
Post by: Thrax
I gotta say, totally disappointed here. After the strong start WGF had with this line, they've just plain dropped the ball with this.
The gun itself is literally, a friggin' box with a pipe sticking out of it. It reminds me of the telephone service boxes I see all over town, usually on corners by the street. It's definitely not a man-portable weapon. I honestly can't imagine anything less exciting.
The gunner, sitting down like that, looks horrid. On the battlefield, if you're sitting down in such a position, you're dead the minute a grenade lands nearby or a sniper zeroes in on you. Hence why real troops kneel - to stay mobile in an emergency and get the hell out of there.
I think if they wanted him sitting down, they should have at least given him one of those cutesy little seats like GW used to have on their IG heavy weapons. At least then they'd be able to pose the legs properly and make them the correct size.
As it is this is a total miss. The gimped gunner, the telephone box, and the general blandness of the set will certainly not do much for WGF's Shock Trooper line.
33033
Post by: kenshin620
Thrax wrote:The gunner, sitting down like that, looks horrid. On the battlefield, if you're sitting down in such a position, you're dead the minute a grenade lands nearby or a sniper zeroes in on you. Hence why real troops kneel - to stay mobile in an emergency and get the hell out of there.
While I still dont like it, as we have shown people do use machine guns/etc by sitting down like that
although they do tend to be smaller
25300
Post by: Absolutionis
From TGNews, New Pictures are up of the whole sprue and assembly:
http://www.wargamesfactory.com/announcements/assemble-shock-troop-heavy-weapons-and-sprues
Assembled models:
Sprues:
Ignoring the heads, and the original "lascannon", it's not bad for the potential price point.
Also, kneeling legs are a welcome inclusion.
6872
Post by: sourclams
Oh god they're so very bad!
I'm not claiming that I could do any better if given a blob of sculpting clay and a knife, but this really appears as if creating a legion of mini- gothic Darth Vaders was the goal of the sculptor from inception.
25300
Post by: Absolutionis
BOW is reporting that the quality of the plastic will be better than these images show.
Considering that these models will be available fairly cheap, they're not awful. I may, at worst, buy a box just to raid for bits some time down the line.
31079
Post by: warspawned
Is it wrong to kind of...like them
The ones kneeling look better than the guys sitting down and I do like that dual gatling gun of death. I'm sure the models can be worked to look decent enough and the price will be key. I've been waiting to see how these turn out and I'm satisfied enough. What's wrong with a legion of mini Darth Vader's anyway?
13060
Post by: Sarrazon
The kneeling legs make these less terrible than I was expecting, and the gatling gun is cool. Now I'm wondering the kneeling legs could be used in place of the sitting ones. On the other hand, I'm a bit irritated with the decision to go with a katana for the officer's sword, as it kinda comes completely out of nowhere - there's really not a huge Japanese influence on these. A saber would've fit much better, I feel.
15115
Post by: Brother SRM
I'm not wowed, but I'm not disgusted. Could definitely be worse, but they're about in line with the originals. I don't get the katana on the officer though.
38451
Post by: Guildsman
Wow. These are as hideous as we all expected. The details are strange. Everything looks like it was slapped together out of cliches that they thought would look cool. And do they not understand legs at all? The kneeling legs are ridiculously short.
8742
Post by: MeanGreenStompa
Actually, I quite like those images, I'm not blown away but yeah, given a decent paint job, they be cool enough for the imperial guard player on a budget.
6292
Post by: Valhallan42nd
Luckily, the Cadian missile launcher doesn't look bad on the standing great coat troopers, and you can sort of futz with them standing around the lascannon/ac cannon from the heavy weapons kit.
15753
Post by: Schmapdi
I'm not blown away - but I think they seem pretty reasonable as a budget friendly solution.
99
Post by: insaniak
It's nice that they managed to sneak in some heavy weapons that actually look like weapons rather than some sort of projection equipment... And the sitting gunner looks a lot better with the slight pose change.
Can't say I'm blown away by these though. The detail looks very soft, and the 'officers' look really awkward.
39004
Post by: biccat
Probably gonna get flamed for this...but the detail on the clothing is much better on these models than on the current Imperial Guardsmen.
The proportions of the models and their helmets really is a killer tho.
41291
Post by: Troy
MeanGreenStompa wrote:Actually, I quite like those images, I'm not blown away but yeah, given a decent paint job, they be cool enough for the imperial guard player on a budget.
Indeed. Make them realistically inexpensive and its game on.
2548
Post by: jmurph
Hmm, they still aren't trimming those necks. And the officer katana is very WTF. OTOH, I like the furry officer robe (but not his superbig hat), kneeling legs and the reworked sitter and weapons look better. Not lascannon looks bad, but I have a crapton of those anyway. If these are cheap enough (like the shock troops) I can definitely see their usefulness.
Also yay for no molded bases!
33033
Post by: kenshin620
Dear god, the flash is just...ugh. I'm lazy so I usually rely on the flash being at a min but geez. Yea they say the plastic will improve, I wonder how much though. Its actually weird when you compare the heads. The missile launcher guy actually has a very nice helmet detail compared to the train conductor guy's hat
Meh is all I can say, its WGF. I dont expect quality from them, I do expect quantity
21664
Post by: poipo32
I'll be buying some and working on them a bit to prove that they are not that bad and actually very salvageable.
550
Post by: Clang
Maybe they'll be like the GW DreadKnight - everyone moans about the basic model but it looks fabulous when converted.
7433
Post by: plastictrees
biccat wrote:Probably gonna get flamed for this...but the detail on the clothing is much better on these models than on the current Imperial Guardsmen.
The proportions of the models and their helmets really is a killer tho.
I don't see why you'd get flamed for expressing your opinion (haha, what am I saying). I do think you're completely wrong though. The folds and hang of the WFG models has a pretty tenuous basis in reality, as though the sculptor had clothes described to him or had one photo of a women in a dress from which to extrapolate all his information on the way cloth works.
I'm curious as to which elements you think are done better. Automatically Appended Next Post: poipo32 wrote:I'll be buying some and working on them a bit to prove that they are not that bad and actually very salvageable.
There are clearly some usable bitz there, and frankly they're never going to look _worse_ than in massive close up.
40741
Post by: Worglock
Absolutionis wrote:BOW is reporting that the quality of the plastic will be better than these images show.
Considering that these models will be available fairly cheap, they're not awful. I may, at worst, buy a box just to raid for bits some time down the line.
Those aren't awful. They're God-awful.
They make Citadel circa 1986 look spectacular.
11
Post by: ph34r
Absolutionis wrote:BOW is reporting that the quality of the plastic will be better than these images show.
Considering that these models will be available fairly cheap, they're not awful. I may, at worst, buy a box just to raid for bits some time down the line.
Just in case you want to put some bad bits on your expensive models?
45599
Post by: RatBot
The guns, the masks, the arms, the legs, most of the poses... Not so good, to put it kindly. And it's like they took Soviet Russians, Nazis, Imperial Japanese, Fascist Italians, and Medieval Crusaders, and threw them haphazardly in a blender with results that are... again, not so good, to put it kindly.
I've seen worse, but ehhhhhhhh.
The minigun is OK, and I like the mask on the minigunner, but other than that, swing and a miss. Maybe a killer paint job would help some, but I don't know.
33248
Post by: SkaerKrow
I'm rather pleased with them, to be honest. I don't need these (I built mine from WGF Shock Troopers and Cadian bits), but I'll get them to support the company and the line.
33033
Post by: kenshin620
RatBot wrote:And it's like they took Soviet Russians, Nazis, Imperial Japanese, Fascist Italians, and Medieval Crusaders, and threw them haphazardly in a blender with results that are... again, not so good, to put it kindly.
In the grim darkness of the non- GW future, there are only blended armies!
33550
Post by: Jubear
I love these and will be getting a few boxes I LIKE the sitting pose as thats how these style of weapons are used.The sculpt looks fine to me (compared to GWs god awfull IG) And if I can save some money buying gloriefied wound markers I am all for it.
9389
Post by: lord marcus
I like them. If I ever get done painting the goodly amount of models i have (realistcly 4 months if i push myself and batchpaint the rankers) I could see loading up on these (unless Mantic's corporation in jan looks better.....that or i find more warzone on the cheapzors.)
30532
Post by: Zefig
That katana IS weird. Maybe they were watching Godzilla: Final Wars when they decided on that. And then never stopped to think if it was actually a good idea.
518
Post by: Kid_Kyoto
Absolutionis wrote:From TGNews, New Pictures are up of the whole sprue and assembly:
I'm not blown away but I can live with them. I mean really, guys, have you ever given the Catachans or Cadians a good look? These might not be great but they're miles ahead of Rambo or the Football helmets.
7433
Post by: plastictrees
Kid_Kyoto wrote:
I'm not blown away but I can live with them. I mean really, guys, have you ever given the Catachans or Cadians a good look? These might not be great but they're miles ahead of Rambo or the Football helmets.
Except not at all. Even if you hate the look of the Catachans and Cadians, they're still clearly better sculpted models. In what way are the WFG "miles ahead" other than attempting to pull of a look that you happen to find more interesting.
31285
Post by: Chrysis
I get the impression that their arms are at least as long as their legs, if not longer. Which I'm pretty sure is a little unnatural. It's most obvious on the pointing guy.
31079
Post by: warspawned
The kneeling legs make these less terrible than I was expecting, and the gatling gun is cool. Now I'm wondering the kneeling legs could be used in place of the sitting ones. On the other hand, I'm a bit irritated with the decision to go with a katana for the officer's sword, as it kinda comes completely out of nowhere - there's really not a huge Japanese influence on these. A saber would've fit much better, I feel.
Don't you mean Lightsaber?
7433
Post by: plastictrees
Chrysis wrote:I get the impression that their arms are at least as long as their legs, if not longer. Which I'm pretty sure is a little unnatural. It's most obvious on the pointing guy.
I personally enjoy the orangutan with the sword thing, and how the gunner sitting on his ass and leaning forward still comes up the officers shoulders.
I understand that they're cheap, and that's great, but why are people so adamant in supporting these guys? Did they get a production discount if their miniatures were awful? Give your money to someone doing something good, don't reward the barely acceptable just because there are no other alternatives.
33248
Post by: SkaerKrow
plastictrees wrote:I understand that they're cheap, and that's great, but why are people so adamant in supporting these guys? Did they get a production discount if their miniatures were awful? Give your money to someone doing something good, don't reward the barely acceptable just because there are no other alternatives.
Don't come here bashing other people for their opinions while placing your own on a pedestal. You think they're terrible and that's fine, but that doesn't mean that the figures are inarguably bad by any stretch.
518
Post by: Kid_Kyoto
plastictrees wrote:Kid_Kyoto wrote:
I'm not blown away but I can live with them. I mean really, guys, have you ever given the Catachans or Cadians a good look? These might not be great but they're miles ahead of Rambo or the Football helmets.
Except not at all. Even if you hate the look of the Catachans and Cadians, they're still clearly better sculpted models. In what way are the WFG "miles ahead" other than attempting to pull of a look that you happen to find more interesting.
The Cadians are well done but just visually uninteresting. And Catachans are better sculpted? really?
Aestheitc arguments aside, the basic greatcoats had 3 head options and 2 gun options + 2 special weapons on half a GW sprue. One thing they got is buyers like options so they gave us plenty. Imagine if the Cadians included not just the football helmet but also a gasmask and a tin pot option, how much better the kit would be.
17349
Post by: SilverMK2
I think Cadians are reasonably interesting to look at - they have enough of the old school Russian cannon fodder and enough sci-fi cannon fodder that you have a lot of different options with them.
These on the other hand seem to be a race of giant headed pygmies who scavenge clothing and equipment from the BBC props department of the 80's.
16689
Post by: notprop
I like this pointing commander guy but the rest are not my cup of tea.
6145
Post by: Gitkikka
As with the basic troopers, these will work fine for my traitor guard.
7433
Post by: plastictrees
Kid_Kyoto wrote:plastictrees wrote:Kid_Kyoto wrote:
I'm not blown away but I can live with them. I mean really, guys, have you ever given the Catachans or Cadians a good look? These might not be great but they're miles ahead of Rambo or the Football helmets.
Except not at all. Even if you hate the look of the Catachans and Cadians, they're still clearly better sculpted models. In what way are the WFG "miles ahead" other than attempting to pull of a look that you happen to find more interesting.
The Cadians are well done but just visually uninteresting. And Catachans are better sculpted? really?
They're ridiculous, but they're clearly better sculpted. The Catachans manage to stick to the same scale within their own sprue for a start. Even the stiff legged leering drunk Catachan has a certain level of detail that these saggy blobs are lacking.
Automatically Appended Next Post:
SkaerKrow wrote:plastictrees wrote:I understand that they're cheap, and that's great, but why are people so adamant in supporting these guys? Did they get a production discount if their miniatures were awful? Give your money to someone doing something good, don't reward the barely acceptable just because there are no other alternatives.
Don't come here bashing other people for their opinions while placing your own on a pedestal. You think they're terrible and that's fine, but that doesn't mean that the figures are inarguably bad by any stretch.
Is there another part of the forum where I am allowed to do that?
This isn't fine art appreciation. There's only a certain amount of subjectivity that can be employed here. They are a very poor demonstration of the craft of model sculpting. If you like the product, hurray for you, I'm sure your army of these guys will look great on the table. As individuals, close up, they are of unequivocally poor quality.
24779
Post by: Eilif
How'd I manage to miss the HW pic and the box art?
I'll give kudos to WGF for getting back to the basic trooper look (I rather liked the original trooper design and was fairly active on the WGF forums during it's inception) and improving the position for the gunner. The new pose has lots of possibilities for a gunner leaning against a wall, or sitting on sandbag. Unfortunately, I don't see the new sitting pose as working for a Missile launcher or mortar.
However, the gun is just terrible. Who in the heck thought that the weapons of the future would be a minifridge with a tripod and a barrel sticking out the side! Perhaps they need a place to keep their cola's cold?
As always, I reserve final judgement for the actual product and maybe the final result will convince me. However, all these pics do is make me really glad I held off on investing in the shocktroops and bought a platoon of old Shockforce Not-IG instead.
EDIT: Just saw the pics of sprues and final figs.
Bad
-Commander arms are territble. Like they can't decide whether they're a blouse or musculature. Just plain bad sculpting
-Laser and Minigun are not well done. Even if you liked the twin barrels, the sculpting on them is very soft.
-Commander heads are just badly done
-8 figs for 20 bucks isn't a great deal compared to their earlier releases, even with the extra bits and HW's.
Good
-Better variation of legs for firers
-Missile launcher and mortar are good looking sculpts
-Commander Torsos are nice and the long coats aren't terribly bad.
Conclusion, most of the Bads could be fixed by
-Splicing commander hands/forearms onto Shock Trooper arms
-Buying some Pig Iron heads to replace the bad commander heads
-Replacing the minigun and laser with Heavy weapons from any of the many aftermarket companies out there.
In the end you'd have a pretty good force for not alot of $. I like converting and modding and with the adjustments listed above I'd be proud to put it on the table. Strait from the box however, they have unacceptable (to me) flaws and are not up to my standards.
5723
Post by: Dez
I don't hate them, I think they look ok with the exception of the KFC Bucket Hat.
5269
Post by: lord_blackfang
I think they're good enough. The officers remind me of this guy http://romanticallyapocalyptic.com/31
24779
Post by: Eilif
Wow, I've never seen that comic before. Absolutely Brilliant!
17349
Post by: SilverMK2
That comic is awesome
Love the art style and sense of humour.
39004
Post by: biccat
plastictrees wrote:biccat wrote:Probably gonna get flamed for this...but the detail on the clothing is much better on these models than on the current Imperial Guardsmen.
The proportions of the models and their helmets really is a killer tho.
I don't see why you'd get flamed for expressing your opinion (haha, what am I saying). I do think you're completely wrong though. The folds and hang of the WFG models has a pretty tenuous basis in reality, as though the sculptor had clothes described to him or had one photo of a women in a dress from which to extrapolate all his information on the way cloth works.
I'm curious as to which elements you think are done better.
The greatcoats on the officers, pants on the soldiers, and particularly the hat of the officer holding the Katana.
Although I suppose if you're used to the appearance of GW's figures and their "a crease here, a fold there" IG troops, you might find these unusual. It's like when people post pictures of appropriately scaled humans not having the GW gorilla features. Lots of people think they look weird.
24779
Post by: Eilif
biccat wrote:plastictrees wrote:
I'm curious as to which elements you think are done better.
The greatcoats on the officers, pants on the soldiers, and particularly the hat of the officer holding the Katana.
I'm a fraid I disagree with you on most counts. The pants on the soldiers may be comparable but...
-The officer's cap is not well proportioned to the head, especially if you're looking at it as being less-heroic. Considering the head is enclosed in a mask, picture the unmasked head with the cap on top. It's more oversized than the worst of the giant soviet officer's caps.
-The Officer greatcoats are niether realistically sculpted, or effectively heroicly sculpted. The one with the fur collar isn't bad, but the one matched with the French Foreign Legion cap (another terrible hat) flows like a lightweight bathrobe. Further, the sleeves on the officer's greatcoats are a bad mix of a lightweight woman's blouse, and overblown arm musculature.
It's fair enough if you prefer the style of the sculpting of the greatcoats, but from all the pictures I've seen the quality, cleanliness and amount of detail on the greatcoats is not an improvement over the Cadians.
33033
Post by: kenshin620
Agreed with those points, quality wise the greatcoats are far from exceeding what GW has done years ago
More info I suppose
Wargames Factory is pleased to announce the first expansion to their Alien Suns Range – Shock Trooper Heavy Weapons Teams. Sprue and production models preview.
Product specs are:
Retail $19.95
Set contains 3-Heavy Weapons Sprues and Crews (6-figures and weapons) plus 1-Officer Sprue (2-figures).
There are a variety of heads and other options plus loads of extra heavy weapons.
Figures are 28mm and compatible with many popular sci-fi wargames
There are 4-different weapons that can be made from this set including:
Heavy Energy Cannon
Dual Multi-Bareled Chan Gun
Mortar
Anti-Tank Rocket Launcher
Availability – mid to late-September 2011
24779
Post by: Eilif
I was just going to say that they weren't much less than Cadian HW's, but then I checked the price of Cadian HW Squads. 38 bucks for 3!
At that comparison, you could throw out the officers (by far the weakest figs in the set), and only use the Mortars and ML's and it would still be a pretty great deal!
10072
Post by: Centurionpainting
Just to assuage comments posted earlier in this thread: Sitting behind the weapon is standard for heavy machineguns when they are mounted on a tripod. I was an infantryman for 4 years and my specialty was the M240, M2, and Mk19 Heavy Machineguns. So, the WGF minis seated behind their weapons would work if the guns were man-portable.
The reason for this practice is recoil and control. When firing these big guns, even if they are supported by a tripod, the rounds have a tendency to be off target. By pressing ones feet down on the legs of the tripod, a machinegunner can get a more controlled burst of fire and be on-target more often. This practice enhances the killing power of the aforementioned weapons.
As for the models, I think they could work if Cadian parts were used. I like my IG to look cohesive but converted, adding my own flavor to 40K armies is the only way I'll roll. I'm in agreement with most of the commens about the officers. Pig Iron heads and Cadian parts are the only way to go here, the sculpts are sub-par. Although, its refreshing WGF is making these minis as I always wanted to see Greatcoat Guard.
47467
Post by: The Mad Tanker
Baby's first heavy weapon.
33033
Post by: kenshin620
The Mad Tanker wrote:Baby's first heavy weapon.
ENTIRE TEAM IZ BABIES!
14152
Post by: CT GAMER
Not impressed. Then again I only used the bodies from the frst set and added Cadian arms/weapons/kit and Pig Iron heads to make some Cadians w/ great coats...
7818
Post by: Kreedos
I'm having a feeling the negative comments get deleted from the site. That's why there's no negative feedback, the "webmaster" must approve all posts.
That's not actual feedback, it's tailored feedback.
Don't like your models, or your website, good luck down the road with something that doesn't look like I pulled it out of the $2 bin at Kmart.
33033
Post by: kenshin620
Kreedos wrote:I'm having a feeling the negative comments get deleted from the site. That's why there's no negative feedback, the "webmaster" must approve all posts.
That's not actual feedback, it's tailored feedback.
Yea this is likely true. You'd be surprised at the amount of deleted posts on the forums. Also they have a facebook page, I bet everything there is also filtered. Now they dont go on a super censoring rampaging spree (there is still quite a lot of constructive criticism on their forums last i checked) But lets just say that if half of these dakka posts were submitted, I probably wouldnt see a lot
11
Post by: ph34r
Kreedos wrote:I'm having a feeling the negative comments get deleted from the site. That's why there's no negative feedback, the "webmaster" must approve all posts.
That's not actual feedback, it's tailored feedback.
Don't like your models, or your website, good luck down the road with something that doesn't look like I pulled it out of the $2 bin at Kmart.
I wouldn't be surprised. Uhg, and that company has so much potential. The ability to put out cheap, decent casting quality sprues of plastic, based on any concept and image that their 3d artists can come up with? I'd kill to have their resources!
1084
Post by: Agamemnon2
Hm, looks like I missed these (being out of the country). Yeah, can't really add anything other than the same feeling of tremendous lost potential. The 3d designers at WGF do not appear to have enough experience with their craft since the cloth details seem to consistently give them problems.
9594
Post by: RiTides
Seeing the sprues, I think they're OK... not worth quite all the hate they seem to have received here, but not specatcular... certainly passable to blend in with their other models and add heavy weapons.
24779
Post by: Eilif
RiTides wrote:Seeing the sprues, I think they're OK... not worth quite all the hate they seem to have received here, but not specatcular... certainly passable to blend in with their other models and add heavy weapons.
I agree, it's a fine way to add heavy weapons. It's the officers that I think completely missed the mark.
8907
Post by: cadbren
They've gone a long way from being a company that actively sought wishlists to one that just throws a more or less finished product down and says deal with it. The original greatcoats did have some semblance of design input from the potential customer base; these just appeared one day and the initial renders were roundly condemned.
If the new "sculptor" has a better understanding of human anatomy than the previous one as their website crudely claims, it's not apparent in this set.
33033
Post by: kenshin620
I think its now for sale
http://www.wargamesfactory.com/webstore/alien-suns/shock-troop-heavy-weapons-1
Whos gonna be the brave soul to buy a set and review it?
26800
Post by: Commander Cain
Wait... That is the only pic of the model WGF have of the team on the site, not the best paintjob I have ever seen tbh! Still. at $20 CAD, what do you expect? EDIT: Make that $20 USD
33033
Post by: kenshin620
Commander Cain wrote:Wait... That is the only pic of the model WGF have of the team on the site, not the best paintjob I have ever seen tbh!
WGF has a low budget methinks when it comes to painters. I mean sure its not going to be GW quality but other companies have some decent folks
1084
Post by: Agamemnon2
Wow, that paintjob somehow makes the models look even worse. I am impressed that they managed to do that.
29833
Post by: The Dwarf Wolf
Hey, bad paint jobs in official minis are good... I mean, you buy them, paint them, and your miniatures will look better than the ones in display: you are a great painter
48312
Post by: SauceCaptain
I just got my box in the mail last week and I have to say I'm really pleased with the whole thing. People talk alot about the "quality" of the minis, but for me any substitute that's 1/2 the price but 80% as good is a win. The nice thing is the amount of options on each sprue. If you don't like the new Darth Vader heads there are two of the original heads to use. The sitting legs look much improved over the original 3D renders, though are still a bit strange. Good news is the kneeling legs are well done and the weapons look good too imo. The officer sprue is a real bonus though. I was looking for something to make some commissars and these will do nicely. Swap in some imperial looking weapons and poof! ready. Oh, and another nice thing is NO bases on their feet to cut off.
So if you're interested I can recommend them. I was a little late to the party and started an army of the shock troops this summer ... so these came out just in time for me. For the first two squads I used a mix of Imperial guard parts, but now at least there is an option that looks like the rest of the army.
24779
Post by: Eilif
SauceCaptain wrote:
So if you're interested I can recommend them. I was a little late to the party and started an army of the shock troops this summer ... so these came out just in time for me. For the first two squads I used a mix of Imperial guard parts, but now at least there is an option that looks like the rest of the army.
Good to hear from someone who has them. Could you post some comparison next to GW figs? I'd really like to see how they look side by side.
|
|