24567
Post by: Kroothawk
Some news by Romanus over at Warseer:
Can confim no Necrons or Nid next month, however there is the release of the Necron and Vampire Counts Battalion Box sets along with something called the Deathknell watch for fantasy, other then that some interesting Black Library releases and some 40k combo kits (Tac Squad and Drop Pod etc) for 40k, all the rest is unfortunatley LOTR.
Cheers,
Rom
Deathknell seems to be the rumoured new Fantasy Fortress:
Eldargal wrote:There has been a new fortress kit ready for some time, apparently. I've heard of its existence from a couple of sources but nothing about an imminent release. There is a lot of terrain ready to go into production that hasn't been released, apparently.
Harry wrote:I heard there was a new much more warhammery 'Mighty fortress' coming... heard that over a year ago .... then heard it was done. Then didn't hear anything else about it.
Not sure skullvane Manse wouldn't be described as a much more Warhammery fortress?
(So have wondered if that was it?)
I heard they would be making more individual pieces rather than one generic fortress.
So maybe Skullvane is the first of a number of similar pieces?
But then again you cant play a proper siege game with Skullvane Manse. (Cool though it is.)
I heard that the Blood in the Badlands was released earlier than expected and that it originally had another scenery kit planned for release with it.
I heard that it was originally planned for March next year (2012)
I heard that is when the next scenery is still being released.
I heard a name for this scenery (from a top quality source of fine rumours and an all round good chap ) ...
... it sounds like a 'fort' to me.
Or at the very least a Watchtower of some kind ..... maybe with a bell ? 
Maybe that's why the Skullvane Tower has a bridge leading nowhere: Combines with this kit. Just a guess though.
MOMUS wrote:Probably havent released the fortress due to IP issues with castle grayskull. Probably. 
494
Post by: H.B.M.C.
Vampires, Lord of the Rings and now Castle Greyskull. This sure is the year of 40K! 
4746
Post by: Flachzange
Kroothawk wrote:Some news by Romanus over at Warseer:
Can confim no Necrons or Nid next month, however there is the release of the Necron and Vampire Counts Battalion Box sets along with something called the Deathknell watch for fantasy, other then that some interesting Black Library releases and some 40k combo kits (Tac Squad and Drop Pod etc) for 40k, all the rest is unfortunatley LOTR.
Cheers,
Rom
Combo-Kits?
Curious ... I was just recently talking to some GW-staffers about that. They said they dont see those coming back in the near-future. I wouldnt mind seeing some cool ones though ...
34242
Post by: -Loki-
One point someone on Warseer raised was that these peices might all fit into one huge terrain peice. Like, the Skullvane tower has a walkway to nowhere. Which might 'plug into' the Fortress, the Garden of Morr might fit inside it, etc.
45990
Post by: gilljoy
Combo boxes really intrigue me, going to hold off buying anything until I get WD this month
33033
Post by: kenshin620
Let me guess, another skull filled Empire themed building 
3330
Post by: Kirasu
WFB needs new skull terrain much more than it needs fixes to the core rules or price structure of new armies
9594
Post by: RiTides
Interested in seeing the castle! Hopefully you're wrong, Kroot, and it's not overly laden with skulls......
20983
Post by: Ratius
Well it hasnt got "Skull" in the name so they're on the right track so far.
11920
Post by: Avrik_Shasla
GW likes skulls far too much, to many holes I suppose...
24567
Post by: Kroothawk
Okay, had a look at the WD. The Deathknell Watch is another skull tower, this time basically the upper part of the Skullvane Tower.
Not exactly what i hoped for.
33033
Post by: kenshin620
Wonderful skulls
Yea, it looks a bit like a copy-paste job.
15115
Post by: Brother SRM
Not terribly exciting, but I like the screaming skull portal thing on the roof. I wish there was some more generic terrain like the Temple of Skulls which could be used in both games, but this tower looks alright.
24153
Post by: tetrisphreak
26 Euros...So that means it'll be about 37.75 USD?
24567
Post by: Kroothawk
Now we have the following Warhammer Fantasy terrain:
Skull Watchtower
Skull Manor House with Skull Watchtower
Skull Sorcery Tower
Ruined Skull Sorcery Tower
Skull Tower Observatory
now new Skull Watchtower
plus
Skull chapel
Skull temple
Skull temple ruins
Skull Throne and Skull Vortex
Skull Stairs and Skull Portal
Garden of Skulls
Walls and Fences of Skulls
Forest of Skulls
Realm of Skulls
Realm of Skulls Extension (with more skulls)
Warhammer Fortress (soon to be discontinued, no skulls!)
And all I wanted was a High Elven tower 
26407
Post by: Bloodwin
I like it. It'll be easier to store than some of their other bits.
44067
Post by: DarkStarSabre
....What the hell is up with the skeleton on the roof?
Is he waving the griffins and pegasi in to land?
23793
Post by: Acardia
DarkStarSabre wrote:....What the hell is up with the skeleton on the roof?
Is he waving the griffins and pegasi in to land?
He looks like the start of a heirotitan conversion......
Honestly I like it, just like skuvanemanor, however. I don't have time to paint terrain. I really wish I did.
2764
Post by: AgeOfEgos
Completely uninspiring--looks like someone phoned that in.
24567
Post by: Kroothawk
Actually, the "bronze guardian" is a signalling device. The army occupying the tower is allowed to reroll the scatter dice 8only this dice, not the d6 or artillery dice), enemy scouts can't be started within 24" then. There are some other nice rules for the tower.
The skull well is on the bottom floor. Can be used separately if you don't glue the tower to the floor.
11783
Post by: illuknisaa
I liked the place holder pic more.
494
Post by: H.B.M.C.
I love GW terrain. I think it's fantastic and I own heaps of it - more than heaps of it, too much of it really. I even like some of the really stupid ones. But... Uhh... Jesus that's horrible. And lazy. The Skullknell Skullwatch Skulltower. Feth me this is getting stupid... does it even link up to the Skullvane Skullmanse?
1084
Post by: Agamemnon2
Fugly. Designed by braindead idiots, for slackjawed yokels.
686
Post by: aka_mythos
H.B.M.C. wrote:Vampires, Lord of the Rings and now Castle Greyskull.
This sure is the year of 40K!
GW seems to always release the same total volume of things for any one of their games in any given year. In years like this 40K year, its like any other, delayed gratification with release for any one game just more tightly clustered and larger periods of nothing new.
GW rejected my concept for a terrain piece, they said there weren't enough spikes:
41701
Post by: Altruizine
Heard a new rumour recently. Apparently they're going to be updating the Realm of Battle gameboards and adding new fissures that contain towers.
5269
Post by: lord_blackfang
I generally like the WHFB terrain, although I don't own any - but this one seems like a complete waste of production time to me. What do we need another tower for?
10347
Post by: Fafnir
I think it needs more skulls.
20983
Post by: Ratius
Looks like I spoke too soon.
Very average imo, another circular tower =/
23014
Post by: LavuranGuard
Looks like it might be a good start for a 40k Cauldron of Blood when mated with a Baneblade chassis.
15930
Post by: I-bounty-hunt-the-elderly
Don't play WHFB, but concurring with everyone else - the skull fixation is just getting even more ridiculous as time goes on. I find it so hard to believe that every tower on the WHFB planet has enormous skulls built in. Even their semaphore system is skull-based.
24567
Post by: Kroothawk
I-bounty-hunt-the-elderly wrote:the skull fixation is just getting even more ridiculous as time goes on.
I would usually agree, but then I looked at your avatar 
13341
Post by: Shepherd23
I am very disappointed by the lack of skulls on this one. And I wish they would come out with a sprue to chaos our fantasy buildings with spikes and more skulls!
All kidding aside, I hate the GW design philosophy of "More SKULLS!" Its like the SNL cowbell skit, just substitute cowbell with skulls. As mentioned earlier, how about some elven towers? Or a dwarven piece? Anything, but yet another skull laden, uninspiring empire piece. How about a lizardman temple? Please?
I can't wait for the new castle walls and keep that come mounted on a skull so big they have to make a special skull laden realms addition to fit it. That will be skulliscious!
686
Post by: aka_mythos
What bugs me about the terrain is that so many of them are just towers. The graveyard was a cool set, but how many towers do we really need? In the least GW could have come up with actual themes for the different towers... like have different ones themed to a couple of different races. Or even a set designed to interconnect to build a fortress.
44067
Post by: DarkStarSabre
Dear GW.
If reading this, please produce Lizardmen scenery.
I would give you all my monies. For life.
As much as I appreciate fantasy scenery, the skulls are a bit OTT on everything as of late. What happened to things like the chapel? Where there were no skulls! Why can't we have some generic, non-Empire, non-skull bits? Surely every battle isn't in the Empire....hell, even the starter box isn't set there. I can't see half this scenery being remotely useful or thematic with the IoB armies...which is a shame because Game + Scenery is a logical step for a buyer.
18072
Post by: TBD
And then the month of february became even more disappointing.
What a fugly piece of fuglyness 
24567
Post by: Kroothawk
Keep in mind that this is basically a recycled repacked sprue from the Skullvane Manse with minor additions.
BTW for the folks wanting a High Elf Tower, have a look here (small Spanish garage company):
http://escenorama.com/shopping/product.php?id_product=38&id_lang=1 (17.95 € unpainted)
http://escenorama.com/shopping/product.php?id_product=46 (20.95 € simply painted)
49069
Post by: Vampirate of Sartosa
"Quick, we need a new terrain piece!"
"Just cut the top off of Skullvane Manse. They'll never notice."
38067
Post by: spaceelf
That is one bad piece of terrain.
What really annoys me is that GW claims that they have a very limited ability to produce plastic models because they only have a few plastic injection machines and the molds are very costly to produce. Then they produce stuff like skulltower. I think in reality they just want to get you to spend money on aspects of the hobby other than miniatures. I hope that they find that people will not buy this junk.
Also I have heard BS excuses about the prices of plastic figures being high because plastic is an oil based product and is thus expensive. We can see this is blatantly false as there is an enormous amount of plastic in kits like the tower and the price is not much more than a box of 10 troops.
33700
Post by: bloodaxegit
I was patient with these skulls, but this is getting out of hand...
51891
Post by: Wolf_Ov_The_Void
Wtf make some good terrain...lazy bastards...if you can produce high quality models why lack nice terrain to display them on?
6646
Post by: Morathi's Darkest Sin
Did anyone get the Skullvane thingy btw, where the skulls moulded on, or did you place them?
Just wondering as some of their other terrain required such 3-d pieces to be glued on. Although that was older stuff from a while back.
As to this thing, well its a tower. I could use it for Mordheim, but I'd not rush to buy one.
4042
Post by: Da Boss
I feel like GW are trolling me. I know it's egocentric, but I can't help it.
320
Post by: Platuan4th
Da Boss wrote:I feel like GW are trolling me. I know it's egocentric, but I can't help it.
It's not just you.
GW is trolling their entire fanbase.
18072
Post by: TBD
I am having this "are the freaking serious??" feeling as well.
4412
Post by: George Spiggott
No skulls carved into the rocks on the base? Not enough skulls IMO.
Aka_Mythos should work for GW, he knows how to do it right.
33495
Post by: infinite_array
Hopelessly stupid, and filled with skulls as usual.
But I can't help but laugh as I imagine the skeleton on top swinging the sticks around going 'Woooohoo! Yeah! Paaaaart-ay!'
2548
Post by: jmurph
Another missed opportunity. There are whole sections that are boring and drab that could have used some highly detailed skulls. Look at that door, the rocks at the base, EVEN THE STAIRS DON'T HAVE SKULLS!
Come on GW, we expect more from you!
6005
Post by: Death By Monkeys
DarkStarSabre wrote:Dear GW.
If reading this, please produce Lizardmen scenery.
I would give you all my monies. For life.
DSS, there is a simple reason why GW will never produce Lizardmen scenery (as much as I would like to see it as well) - there's not enough potential for SKULLZ.
Seriously, sometimes I think, "If I could only become the world's foremost sculptor of miniature skulls, then GW would have no choice but to hire me."
14863
Post by: MasterSlowPoke
spaceelf wrote:
What really annoys me is that GW claims that they have a very limited ability to produce plastic models because they only have a few plastic injection machines and the molds are very costly to produce. Then they produce stuff like skulltower. I think in reality they just want to get you to spend money on aspects of the hobby other than miniatures. I hope that they find that people will not buy this junk.
At least this one shares most of the sprue space with the Skullmane Vance tower.
22687
Post by: MajorTom11
Wow... the skull thing has really gone beyond a joke at this point... give it a bloody rest already, or at least make them optional... it's truly bizarre at this point...
29976
Post by: Saphos
Erm, sorry, but I still kinda like it. I feel bad for not chiming in in all the negativity but I can´t help it. ^^ More terrain for Lizardmen or the Elven tower would indeed be nicer though.
29190
Post by: CURNOW
ok as spme of you mite know i work in the games design department at GW and ive been watching this thread with interest and due to the fact that our new" SKULL TOWER tm" has gone down so well im going to give you a sneek peek of our new intergrated.. SKULL tm .. range of terain ...hope it builds your apertite for all our future release's ?
heres what were working on for wave 1
hope you like them and were realy excited to be able to relase this extensive new range of skulltastic scenery that for the first time realy make you feel your part of the old world .
5
52123
Post by: Xanrn
I feel sad that I am the only one who looked at the Skeleton on the roof and went "ha a Skeleton Semaphore"...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Semaphore_line
Though strictly seems to be a Skeleton doing Flag Semaphore.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flag_semaphore
19148
Post by: Aerethan
Doesn't everyone adorn their towers with the skulls of slain giants? And if you have slain no giants, carve some skulls out of solid stone so you look intimidating.
Wouldn't you all rage if you found out that Matt Ward was responsible for all the skulls! It's almost too funny to be wrong.
I'll stick with Hirst Arts molds. Infinite customization, a proper realistic look, and a lifetimes worth of hobby to do.
24567
Post by: Kroothawk
Actually, that's the intention. Accorfding to the rules included in WD, there is a secret arcane book called "The Semaphorium" in the tower that is basically an illustrated manual for submitting signals with the skeleton.
256
Post by: Oaka
So is there a greater daemon of Khorne somewhere sitting on a throne of clavicles or ulnas?
14529
Post by: Erasoketa
There's something wrong with that pile of skulls. It has bricks on it.
10104
Post by: snurl
Less skulls would have been nice. To answer an earlier post, the skulls are molded into Skullvane Manse. The only optional parts are the tower top/observatory and some maltese cross shaped wall plates.
I wonder if it ends here or if there is more to come? The new tower does fit to Skullvane making a bigger structure which goes together well.
27987
Post by: Surtur
Sorry kid your skull must be at least this tall to be used in our building.
5478
Post by: Panic
yeah,
gilljoy wrote:Combo boxes really intrigue me, going to hold off buying anything until I get WD this month
This comment explains exactly why GW Likes to control it's new release schedule and hates leaks.
Panic...
4412
Post by: George Spiggott
Panic wrote:yeah,
gilljoy wrote:Combo boxes really intrigue me, going to hold off buying anything until I get WD this month
This comment explains exactly why GW Likes to control it's new release schedule and hates leaks.
Panic...
Because it doesn't like its customers making informed decisions about purchasing its products?
514
Post by: Orlanth
like many here I hate 'terrain of skulls' with the exception of Garden of Morr, as skulls belong in graveyards.
However no critique on this occassion. The skull tower already exists its just one extra sprue with a base and top to change it into something else. This to me is just being efficient with what you have got.
However I do hope this is the last new skull infest project. Please GW, do something else.
27872
Post by: Samus_aran115
Skeleton on the roof is too much. It's an awful piece of terrain as it is, but the skeleton is just too ridiculous.
What are they thinking with all these useless towers and bulk pieces? Sure, cover is great, but I can use piled up text books if that's all I need. Ruins are what I imagine to be a common sight on the battlefield, and they're much harder to make.
3989
Post by: Padre
Platuan4th wrote:Da Boss wrote:I feel like GW are trolling me. I know it's egocentric, but I can't help it.
It's not just you.
GW is trolling their entire fanbase.
Plat, Boss... sadly, I think you've hit it on the head right there...
If not trolling us, then definitely insulting our intelligence.
Surely, they MUST realise that there are other companies out there right now (like Hirst etc) who make better, more realistic scenery kits?
Padre^.
46467
Post by: Spazz
Anyone know what model that is on the tower. I to lazy to try to find it on GWs ultra modern easy to browse website.
9594
Post by: RiTides
Kroothawk wrote:Okay, had a look at the WD. The Deathknell Watch is another skull tower, this time basically the upper part of the Skullvane Tower.
Not exactly what i hoped for.
Boooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Give me a break...
And I would've bought this had it been anywhere near decent, too!
4746
Post by: Flachzange
DarkStarSabre wrote:....What the hell is up with the skeleton on the roof?
Is he waving the griffins and pegasi in to land?
AgeOfEgos wrote:Completely uninspiring--looks like someone phoned that in.
I lol`d ... hard!
George Spiggott wrote:Panic wrote:yeah,
gilljoy wrote:Combo boxes really intrigue me, going to hold off buying anything until I get WD this month
This comment explains exactly why GW Likes to control it's new release schedule and hates leaks.
Panic...
Because it doesn't like its customers making informed decisions about purchasing its products?
Agreed! GW is really better off with customers not buying something because they are waiting for a rumored product. Once that rumor turns out to be false, they wont ... well buy anything at all?! Awesome!
By the way, that tower would be awesome, if it were not for the skulls on the side. The brickwork is actually pretty nice looking ....
44886
Post by: Arm.chair.general
I have seen worse terrain.
31210
Post by: manoknok
What is the model at the bottom of the steps?
34899
Post by: Eumerin
Oh, cool. They've released an unarmored body for the Tomb Kings' giant skeleton.
But why'd they package an obviously Empire tower with it? Wouldn't it have made more sense to bundle some TK-themed terrain with the giant's body? What are TK players going to do with Empire kit?
And all I wanted was a High Elven tower
If you're serious, look at GF9's elven scenery.
47785
Post by: Lord Poison
oh god I am so glad I switched to flames of war
1084
Post by: Agamemnon2
Padre wrote:
Surely, they MUST realise that there are other companies out there right now (like Hirst etc) who make better, more realistic scenery kits?
I think they do, which is why theirs look like He-Man toys.
9892
Post by: Flashman
Well that get's another from me.
A deeply cynical release. I'm minded of the Malibu Stacey episode of the Simpsons - "It's Malibu Stacey... but with a new hat!
38067
Post by: spaceelf
If GW really wanted to push skulls it would not have been hard to make something cool. I think a giant ziggurat made entirely of small skulls would look really cool.
7361
Post by: Howard A Treesong
H.B.M.C. wrote:I love GW terrain. I think it's fantastic and I own heaps of it - more than heaps of it, too much of it really. I even like some of the really stupid ones.
I like those too, but the throne needs someone sitting in it, the Liche King from Warhammer Quest would be ideal, if you can find one.
494
Post by: H.B.M.C.
I actually have that Liche King. Hmm... not a bad idea. Thanks! 
24567
Post by: Kroothawk
Spazz wrote:Anyone know what model that is on the tower. I to lazy to try to find it on GWs ultra modern easy to browse website.
manoknok wrote:What is the model at the bottom of the steps?
That is one of the Imperiums Technicus miniatures, seems currently unavailable.
http://whfb.lexicanum.de/wiki/Technikus_%28Imperium%29
6005
Post by: Death By Monkeys
Limited Edition (I believe) Marco Columbo, I think.
11610
Post by: Tzeentchling9
Looks pretty cool(if a little generic) if you take out the big skulls, the silly thing on top, and maybe the wrap-around stairs on the outside.
6646
Post by: Morathi's Darkest Sin
Its the old Imperial Engineer, he's still available as a normal purchase, just not finecast so need to get him direct from GW. Engineer
4042
Post by: Da Boss
Is the "I really LOVE skullz" market really bigger than the "I really HATE skullz" market? Because surely the middle market of "I like detailed scenery!" is not going to mind the lack of skulls. Maybe GW market research leads them to believe that items with skulls on them sell better?
Baffling.
17002
Post by: RossDas
Da Boss wrote:Is the "I really LOVE skullz" market really bigger than the "I really HATE skullz" market? Because surely the middle market of "I like detailed scenery!" is not going to mind the lack of skulls. Maybe GW market research leads them to believe that items with skulls on them sell better?
Baffling.
And in an era when GW seems dedicated to the concept of multi-option kits it doesn't seem too much to ask for the skulls to be optional as well.
21358
Post by: Dysartes
Da Boss wrote:Is the "I really LOVE skullz" market really bigger than the "I really HATE skullz" market? Because surely the middle market of "I like detailed scenery!" is not going to mind the lack of skulls. Maybe GW market research leads them to believe that items with skulls on them sell better?
Baffling.
Nice theory, but I've bolded the bit that renders it invalid
8330
Post by: kestral
If they were smart the giant skulls would be optional. That would be pure win-win. Extra skulls for skull mad converters, more or less realistic castles for the rest of us.
14098
Post by: Marrak
I think someone hit the nail on the head with a comment earlier...
They know other companies make realistic scenery, and very well. So their options are:
1) Make scenery that takes their IP and design to the extreme
2) Try to compete with other the multitude of other scenery companies.
Love it or hate it, at least their stuff stands out.
46467
Post by: Spazz
Thanks Kroot
37097
Post by: blood lance
I dont know, as someone has said, it looks great if you remove the skulls the signalstatue the stairs the walls the tower and the interior.
You are left with a nice engineer model
24020
Post by: vitki
blood lance wrote:I dont know, as someone has said, it looks great if you remove the skulls the signalstatue the stairs the walls the tower and the interior.
You are left with a nice engineer model
Fine print:
*Engineer model not included*
26800
Post by: Commander Cain
Kroothawk wrote:Now we have the following Warhammer Fantasy terrain:
Skull Watchtower
Skull Manor House with Skull Watchtower
Skull Sorcery Tower
Ruined Skull Sorcery Tower
Skull Tower Observatory
now new Skull Watchtower
plus
Skull chapel
Skull temple
Skull temple ruins
Skull Throne and Skull Vortex
Skull Stairs and Skull Portal
Garden of Skulls
Walls and Fences of Skulls
Forest of Skulls
Realm of Skulls
Realm of Skulls Extension (with more skulls)
Warhammer Fortress (soon to be discontinued, no skulls!)
And all I wanted was a High Elven tower
Darn it GW! Where is my castle of skulls!
The kit strikes me as a very unimaginitave copy of the last three skull towers that they have launched. There are all kinds of cool WFB sets they could come up with. I would love to see some lizard men stuff or maybe some dwarf or skaven terrain, not impressed...
3720
Post by: brettz123
Agamemnon2 wrote:Fugly. Designed by braindead idiots, for slackjawed yokels.
Usually I think your way over the top but that really just about sums it up. Only could be better if they fit two or three more giant skulls on it. I mean can GW release any terrain with less than five giant skulls on it these days?
10104
Post by: snurl
The Arcane Ruins have an extra skulls sprue. That would have been nice here.
The Fences and Walls set is skull-free.
I dont mind Empire buildings but I would like to see some more generalised houses/shops. Enough with the skulls already.
21462
Post by: Ehsteve
This terrain inspires me to like their older range of scenery simply out of spite for the new stuff.
Honestly without the two-inch skulls on the side of that watchtower I would buy it as generic terrain but unfortunately GW feel the need to watermark every new piece of terrain that comes out with massive bloody skulls. That is all the skulls are: watermarks.
28634
Post by: Darsc Zacal
Yep. I bought the Skullvane Manse thinking I could probably just sand down or cover up most of the skulls and have an interesting terrain piece that was a bit different. I knew it would be a fair bit of work... But as soon as I opened up the box and saw just how much surface area the skulls covered, and how they were just effin everywhere, even more than I had seen in photos. Well, it's still in the box.
Now seeing this tower made up of recycled parts has confirmed my feeling that I won't be getting anymore GW terrain unless there's a major change in their design department.
20075
Post by: Vermillion
Guys, you got it all wrong. All that is on the tower is needed. Skulls on the side to say "THIS IS GAMES WORKSHOP!!!!!" and the skeleton on top is the most important part. They want fantasy to have more flying monsters and to help you in the confusion of where to route them to this is the fantasy air traffic control .
24567
Post by: Kroothawk
snurl wrote:The Fences and Walls set is skull-free.
Nope, although less than usual I admit:
BTW here some comments by Hastings no less
75hastings69 wrote:Excellent! a few more WFB tower releases and I'll be able to field an army of towers!
(...)
Yep next wfb army book "warhammer armies: towers with loads of skulls on" I'm guessing this new tower would be one of the core choices?
Having looked at it over and over again it isn't that bad, it's just enough with the skulls already!
Also a question to GW designers:- do all other warhammer races live out in the open with nothing more than a newspaper over their heads? Also does everyone in the empire live in some kind of skull infested tower? If so do regular houses appear creepy to the tower dwellers???
29784
Post by: timetowaste85
The waving skeleton at the top is more than ridiculous. Who the hell thought that would be a good idea? Marketing should be summarily executed by an Orc Big'Un.
24567
Post by: Kroothawk
Small update by Harry:
Harry wrote:Well lets have a look at what I said .....
Harry wrote:I heard there was a new much more warhammery 'Mighty fortress' coming... heard that over a year ago .... then heard it was done. Then didn't hear anything else about it.
Not sure skullvane Manse wouldn't be described as a much more Warhammery fortress?
(So have wondered if that was it?)
I heard they would be making more individual pieces rather than one generic fortress.
So maybe Skullvane is the first of a number of similar pieces?
Well this piece IS fairly similar you have to admit.
I am not sure what to expect.
As I said Skullvane could easily be the more 'Warhammery fortress' I heard about.
I heard about it at roughly the same time as the grave far which we have seen.
As far as I know there are no plans to replace the current "Mighty Fortress".
But I am still expecting some more scenery.
|
|
