Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

This must be the main cast for the campaign. I assume we'll also see Hoffman and at least one of the two remaining Carmine brothers at some point.

Watch this:

http://www.gametrailers.com/video/e3-2010-gears-of-war/101281

Wiminz!

No it is not. in the gameinformer cover there is a new black guy that is not cole. He isnt in there. The brunette idk. maybe anyas counter part to coles and bairds campaign.

no Cole...really?
it looks an awful lot like Cole and Baird to me.

There is cole. just not with marcus.
Him and baird will have there own part of the campaign that goes along the other one.

Maybe the last carmine brothers a...sister?

That'd be cool

Anyone else notice the camel toe fenix has?

This term "cameltoe".

It does not mean what you think it means.

The brunette chick might be Alex, from the comics. I can't see the side of her face that might have the scar.
I'm hoping to see Bernadette 'Berni" Mataki, from the books as well.

That and Carmine. he's my favorite.

The brunette is Sam, they say it in the vid.

Didn't notice the link, thanks.

Hehe, i hated berserker's -.-

I dont want their to be a lambent one!

Are those women wearing functional, non-revealing armour? Do they not want to sell any copies?

Yeah. it is to show they are not dolls to be looked at. they are kick butt women which games need more of.

garret wrote:No it is not. in the gameinformer cover there is a new black guy that is not cole. He isnt in there. The brunette idk. maybe anyas counter part to coles and bairds campaign.

Cole and Baird were both in the gameplay video with the rest of Delta.

Yep, I have no clue what garbage bin he got that info from. It doesn't even make sense.

I got it from game informer. Who they got from stright in from the horses mouth.
And was the gameplay at the beggining because they do fight right along with you there as npc. Im telling you guys the truth.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Ok let me explain it better. in the campaign cole and baird will not be with fenix. They Will have there own parts of the game. like halo 2. althernating between one and the other. Also how dare you call game informer a trash bin.

What, do you work for them or something? It's a freaking magazine, not holy gospel.

garret wrote:
Also how dare you call game informer a trash bin.

Dude, you get more accurate information on games from rumours and leaks on the internet than actual magazines.

Being the lazy bastard I am, I just wiat for someone on dakka to post it.

From my experiance you dont. Beside. everything game informer gets is true. Not speculation or leaks which may or may not be true Besides i read it for more then just the previews. I read it for reviews. Besides i dont always have the internet with me.

garret wrote:From my experiance you dont. Beside. everything game informer gets is true. Not speculation or leaks which may or may not be true Besides i read it for more then just the previews. I read it for reviews. Besides i dont always have the internet with me.

Paid reviews are rubbish. You only get honest views from players who give their own opinion and not what they're being paid to write.

Example: Metro 2033. In IGN's video review, the reviewer spent most of the video saying how it was generally a good game, noting the excellent voice acting, story and atmosphere, but still hit it with a 6.9/10 despite its FPS mechanics being just as good as those of other games.

And yet when Nintendo release another Pokemon rehash, it gets universal acclaim from reviewers...

Paid reviewers are biased. Listen to players instead.

Not really. I have seen games that are big get blasted from them. Like the new avp. They are a good magazine.

garret wrote:Not really. I have seen games that are big get blasted from them. Like the new avp. They are a good magazine.

It wasn't that big of a release. Certainly nowhere near the scale of CoD, Halo, WoW or any of the other big titles. The first two AvP FPS games, while clearly popular, weren't mainstream.

Whats your point i really dont get it. Website reviewers are not different then paid ones. One is doing it for fun one for livlyhood. Why are paid people biased.

garret wrote:Whats your point i really dont get it. Website reviewers are not different then paid ones. One is doing it for fun one for livlyhood. Why are paid people biased.

I didn't say website reviewers are different (because they're often paid as well!), I said players are different.

Seriously! 3.0 is gonna be a bitch to get.

Borkin wrote:Seriously! 3.0 is gonna be a bitch to get.

One million kills.

You know it to be true.

And you have to play the game to review. All people at the magazine are players themselves. You wouldnt hire someone who doesnt know anything about videos games as a reviewer for a game sight.