U.S. border agent jailed for improper arrest of suspected drug smuggler
A U.S. Border Patrol agent has been sentenced to two years in prison for improperly lifting the arms of a 15-year-old drug smuggling suspect while handcuffed — in what the Justice Department called a deprivation of the teenager’s constitutional right to be free from the use of unreasonable force.

Agent Jesus E. Diaz Jr. was named in a November 2009 federal grand jury indictment with deprivation of rights under color of law during an October 2008 arrest near the Rio Grande in Eagle Pass, Texas, in response to a report that illegal immigrants had crossed the river with bundles of drugs.

In a prosecution sought by the Mexican government and obtained after the suspected smuggler was given immunity to testify against the agent, Diaz was sentenced last week by U.S. District Judge Alia Moses Ludlum in San Antonio. The Mexican consulate in Eagle Pass had filed a formal written complaint just hours after the arrest, alleging that the teenager had been beaten.

Defense attorneys argued that there were no injuries or bruises on the suspected smuggler’s lower arms where the handcuffs had been placed nor any bruising resulting from an alleged knee on his back. Photos showed the only marks on his body came from the straps of the pack he carried containing the suspected drugs, they said.

Border Patrol agents found more than 150 pounds of marijuana at the arrest site.

**FILE** An unidentified man in Mexico walks near a footbridge across the Rio Grande connecting the United States and Mexico near Acala, Texas, on Aug. 4, 2010. The bridge is one of two structures at opposite ends of a towering $2.4 billion west Texas stretch of steel border fence designed to block illegal entry. Though the International Boundary and Water Commission owns the bridges, which it calls grade control structures, both are unguarded paths into the United States from Mexico. (Associated Press)The defense claimed that the smuggling suspect was handcuffed because he was uncooperative and resisted arrest, and that the agent had lifted his arms to force him to the ground — a near-universal police technique — while the other agents looked for the drugs.

The allegations against Diaz, 31, a seven-year veteran of the Border Patrol, initially were investigated by Homeland Security's Office of Inspector General and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's Office of Professional Responsibility, which cleared the agent of any wrongdoing.

But the Internal Affairs Division at U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled differently nearly a year later and, ultimately, the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Texas brought charges.

The Law Enforcement Officers Advocates Council said the government’s case was “based on false testimony that is contradicted by the facts.”

In a statement, the council said that because the arrest took place at about 2 a.m., darkness would have made it impossible for the government’s witnesses to have seen whether any mistreatment took place. It said Marcos Ramos, the Border Patrol agent who stood next to Diaz, testified that he did not see any mistreatment of the smuggling suspect.

The council said other witnesses made contradictory claims and some later admitted to having perjured themselves. Such admissions, the council said, were ignored by the court and the government. It also said that probationary agents who claimed to have witnessed the assault raised no objections during the incident and failed to notify an on-duty supervisor until hours later.

“Instead, they went off-duty to a local ‘Whataburger’ restaurant, got their stories straight and reported it hours later to an off-duty supervisor at his home,” the council said. “Then the ‘witnesses’ went back to the station and reported their allegations.”

The council also noted that the teenager claimed no injuries in court other than sore shoulders, which the council attributed to “the weight of the drug load, approximately 75 pounds, he carried across the border.”

The U.S. Attorney's Office for the Western District of Texas, which brought the charges, is the same office that in February 2006 — under U.S. Attorney Johnny Sutton — prosecuted Border Patrol Agents Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean after they shot a drug-smuggling suspect, Osvaldo Aldrete-Davila, in the buttocks as he tried to flee back into Mexico after abandoning a van filled with 800 pounds of marijuana. Aldrete-Davila also was given immunity in the case and testified against the agents.

Agents Ramos and Compean were convicted and sentenced to 11 and 12 years in prison, respectively

mega_bassist wrote:Hey, maybe you shouldn't try to smuggle illegal drugs into our country. That sounds like a good idea.

There is something seriously wrong with people...

Ahtman wrote:Hey, maybe the guys meant to uphold the law shouldn't be breaking it. That sounds like a good idea.

mega_bassist wrote:

Ahtman wrote:Hey, maybe the guys meant to uphold the law shouldn't be breaking it. That sounds like a good idea.

I'm sorry, but I could care less if someone that illegally crossed the border with the intent to sell/distribute illegal drugs and is roughed up in the process.

Melissia wrote:I don't care about them either, but if it had been an innocent person I'd be rather ticked-- and we have this whole guilty until proven innocent thing so...

mega_bassist wrote:

Ahtman wrote:Hey, maybe the guys meant to uphold the law shouldn't be breaking it. That sounds like a good idea.

I'm sorry, but I could care less if someone that illegally crossed the border with the intent to sell/distribute illegal drugs and is roughed up in the process.

Ahtman wrote:

mega_bassist wrote:

Ahtman wrote:Hey, maybe the guys meant to uphold the law shouldn't be breaking it. That sounds like a good idea.

I'm sorry, but I could care less if someone that illegally crossed the border with the intent to sell/distribute illegal drugs and is roughed up in the process.

Why do you hate the law so much, yet live in a country that is founded on the idea of the rule of law? If you are willing to just toss it out on mere whims such as this, it may as well not even exist. There are many places in the world you could go to where they don't have these laws getting in the way of roughing people up you don't like.

Ahtman wrote:

mega_bassist wrote:

Ahtman wrote:Hey, maybe the guys meant to uphold the law shouldn't be breaking it. That sounds like a good idea.

I'm sorry, but I could care less if someone that illegally crossed the border with the intent to sell/distribute illegal drugs and is roughed up in the process.

Why do you hate the law so much, yet live in a country that is founded on the idea of the rule of law? If you are willing to just toss it out on mere whims such as this, it may as well not even exist. There are many places in the world you could go to where they don't have these laws getting in the way of roughing people up you don't like.

ineptus astartes wrote:Oh, JP. your back, you missed the 'new zombie RP' but oh well...

Anyways.


I...just...gah. if a dugrunner comes illegally over the border with the intent to cause a breach of the peace, I say that you should be able to rough them up a bit if they don't protest.

jp400 wrote:What a sad world we live in when an ILLEGAL alien has more rights then the officer arrenting his dumb ass does.

Ahtman wrote:

jp400 wrote:What a sad world we live in when an ILLEGAL alien has more rights then the officer arrenting his dumb ass does.

Except he doesn't have more rights, he has the same rights. The law says you can't beat up prisoners, not that they can't beat up prisoners unless they are from Mexico and in that case just go nuts becuase they aren't really people anyway.

ineptus astartes wrote:Yes, but this kid was breaking not one, not two, but THREE laws.

Ahtman wrote:

jp400 wrote:What a sad world we live in when an ILLEGAL alien has more rights then the officer arrenting his dumb ass does.

Except he doesn't have more rights, he has the same rights. The law says you can't beat up prisoners, not that they can't beat up prisoners unless they are from Mexico and in that case just go nuts becuase they aren't really people anyway.

ineptus astartes wrote:

Ahtman wrote:

jp400 wrote:What a sad world we live in when an ILLEGAL alien has more rights then the officer arrenting his dumb ass does.

Except he doesn't have more rights, he has the same rights. The law says you can't beat up prisoners, not that they can't beat up prisoners unless they are from Mexico and in that case just go nuts becuase they aren't really people anyway.

Yes, but this kid was breaking not one, not two, but THREE laws.

Frazzled wrote:Typically at best in a circumstance like this, the perp would walk. Having the cop actually go to jail is unheard of. In addition to apparently being in the pocket of the cartels (same guy prosecuted two agent who got into a shoot out with a drug smuggler) he appears to be super lawyer.

mega_bassist wrote:

Ahtman wrote:Hey, maybe the guys meant to uphold the law shouldn't be breaking it. That sounds like a good idea.

I'm sorry, but I could care less if someone that illegally crossed the border with the intent to sell/distribute illegal drugs and is roughed up in the process.

First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.

CT GAMER wrote:

mega_bassist wrote:

Ahtman wrote:Hey, maybe the guys meant to uphold the law shouldn't be breaking it. That sounds like a good idea.

I'm sorry, but I could care less if someone that illegally crossed the border with the intent to sell/distribute illegal drugs and is roughed up in the process.

Dangerous thinking.

The danger being:

First they came for the communists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a communist.

Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a trade unionist.

Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak out because I wasn't a Jew.

Then they came for me
and there was no one left to speak out for me.

There is something to be said for maintaining the moral high ground.

It is what seperates "us" from "them"

Kilkrazy wrote:Surely the constitution and the law offer a moral framework.

The USA isn't a banana republic.