Switch Theme:

Repulsor Executioner FAQ  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Horrific Hive Tyrant





PSA that they've issued an FAQ to allow non-codex chapters to take this unit now!


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Note also that they have explicitly included Deathwatch!

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/07/30 14:04:39


 
   
Made in us
Decrepit Dakkanaut




Yeah but when can Deathwatch take the sneaky Marines that were just released?

CaptainStabby wrote:
If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.

 jy2 wrote:
BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.

 vipoid wrote:
Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?

 MarsNZ wrote:
ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Link?
   
Made in us
Locked in the Tower of Amareo




Where is it?
   
Made in gb
Ultramarine Librarian with Freaky Familiar





https://www.warhammer-community.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/warhammer_40000_repulsor_executioner_update_en.pdf

Is here.


They/them

 
   
Made in us
Locked in the Tower of Amareo




Wait, didn't it use to be 185?
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Ayup. Twin stubber also went from 9 to 10.
   
Made in us
Omnipotent Necron Overlord






Don't tell me they raised the cost...It's already overcosted...LOL

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/07/30 14:50:49


If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder 
   
Made in us
Locked in the Tower of Amareo




They did. It's the same cost as the old repulsor, so maybe its a typo.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Martel732 wrote:
They did. It's the same cost as the old repulsor, so maybe its a typo.


Typo or no, its the new cost.

Well done gee dubs, well done.
   
Made in us
Omnipotent Necron Overlord






Martel732 wrote:
They did. It's the same cost as the old repulsor, so maybe its a typo.
How dumb is GW? Probably take 3 weeks to fix this.

If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder 
   
Made in us
Powerful Phoenix Lord





Dallas area, TX

 Xenomancers wrote:
Martel732 wrote:
They did. It's the same cost as the old repulsor, so maybe its a typo.
How dumb is GW? Probably take 3 weeks to fix this.
Whatchu mean 3 weeks? They just "fixed" it with this FAQ. As-in fixed it so that their sales get hurt so bad by it that the next Chapter Approved will drop the points for both Repulsor tanks (fingers crossed)

-

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/07/30 14:59:22


   
Made in us
Locked in the Tower of Amareo




I'd bet some money that it was a cut and paste error.
   
Made in us
Omnipotent Necron Overlord






 Galef wrote:
 Xenomancers wrote:
Martel732 wrote:
They did. It's the same cost as the old repulsor, so maybe its a typo.
How dumb is GW? Probably take 3 weeks to fix this.
Whatchu mean 3 weeks? They just "fixed" it with this FAQ. As-in fixed it so that their sales get hurt so bad by it that the next Chapter Approved will drop the points for both Repulsor tanks (fingers crossed)

-
Your logic is sound when considering it is GW we are talking about Though ofc real business smarts would be to lower the things point cost on your new 100$ dollar tank. LOL.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
Martel732 wrote:
I'd bet some money that it was a cut and paste error.
Perhaps but will they admit it in that case?

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2019/07/30 15:15:09


If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder 
   
Made in us
Dakka Veteran




No way they re-print the costs if they intended it to stay the same...

I mean, we are dealing with GW here but that seems like such a bone head move I find it hard to believe it is a mistake.

Why even open yourselves up to a mistake if you weren't touching them.

And I'm still pissed that DW can't take the new phobos. I have no idea why they are being excluded but it's really annoying
   
Made in us
Locked in the Tower of Amareo




Bone head? GW? That's like chocolate and peanut butter.

   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Someone asked in the GW 40K thread, and they responded it was a increase not a Error.

So intended to cost more.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/07/30 15:53:09


 
   
Made in us
Locked in the Tower of Amareo




Oh, stupid for another reason, then. It needed a points drop, not increase.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2019/07/30 15:56:36


 
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





<sarcasm>Or maybe GW are the only ones that realize just how OP Marines are right now!</sarcasm>
   
Made in us
Locked in the Tower of Amareo




Why sarcasm? They might think that.
   
Made in us
Omnipotent Necron Overlord






I think this is actually the point where I stop playing 40k competitively in any sense and just find people to play by the rules I want to play (which are rules that don't suck complete ass). Sheer incompetent rules team. Shinning spears were literally undercosted for a year. They could have made a change like this at any point but didn't. Then we have an obviously overcosted model like the executioner...they release an in between nerf without even looking at tournament data or whatnot. I mean it's so effing baffling it is disgusting. I actually want to slap a person in the face for this. I spent 200$ and a ton of time getting 2 of these ready to play with even knowing they were going to underperform...then they nerf it? WOW.

If we fail to anticipate the unforeseen or expect the unexpected in a universe of infinite possibilities, we may find ourselves at the mercy of anyone or anything that cannot be programmed, categorized or easily referenced.
- Fox Mulder 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




My Porphy feels your pain.. over there.. on the shelf..
   
Made in us
Fixture of Dakka





Don't they usually do a post-release FAQ within a set window of release?
   
Made in us
Locked in the Tower of Amareo




 Xenomancers wrote:
I think this is actually the point where I stop playing 40k competitively in any sense and just find people to play by the rules I want to play (which are rules that don't suck complete ass). Sheer incompetent rules team. Shinning spears were literally undercosted for a year. They could have made a change like this at any point but didn't. Then we have an obviously overcosted model like the executioner...they release an in between nerf without even looking at tournament data or whatnot. I mean it's so effing baffling it is disgusting. I actually want to slap a person in the face for this. I spent 200$ and a ton of time getting 2 of these ready to play with even knowing they were going to underperform...then they nerf it? WOW.


It's always a risk with GW. But increasing a non-invuln platform by 30 pts is nuts.
   
Made in de
Nihilistic Necron Lord






Germany

Its 31. The Twin icarus ironhail heavy stubber went from 9 to 10.
   
Made in us
Ancient Venerable Dark Angels Dreadnought





It certainly may backfire on them as I went from "cool, deathwatch may now have a viable anti-armour choice so I can go pure DW" to "raised the points already? nah, I'll stick with a Krast knight thanks". Saved $200 right there in one quick post.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




 bullyboy wrote:
It certainly may backfire on them as I went from "cool, deathwatch may now have a viable anti-armour choice so I can go pure DW" to "raised the points already? nah, I'll stick with a Krast knight thanks". Saved $200 right there in one quick post.


Whole lotta this going on right now methinks.
   
Made in kr
Stalwart Space Marine






Well, there goes the brief moments of joy I felt when using two executioners at 2K games.

Even though target saturation is key to using high value unit, the points increase makes bringing even a single executioner a daunting challenge.
Let alone using two or more in the 2K list.

I might be biased, but it seems GW is strangely cautious about giving Space Marines cost effective units.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2019/07/30 16:36:53


 
   
Made in fi
Courageous Space Marine Captain






This and the new melee lieutenant without a real melee weapon has pretty drastically dampened my enthusiasm for the new marine codex. I really don't understand why GW is hell bent on making the marines utterly terrible.

   
Made in us
Ancient Venerable Dark Angels Dreadnought





One of the biggest problems is Guilleman. He skews so much of marine stuff that it's pointed in such a way to be mostly useless in other chapters. I just don't think GW can see this.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: