Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 11:17:44
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
FB now demands, with no option to refuse, you send them a pic of your face to get an account.
I had a fb account once, deleted it when zuck said he would "go to the mat" with an elected president who tried to increase taxes on big corporations or regulate them, ( Zuck was basically saying he'd use his wealth and financial power to stop a president elected by the people from carrying out their wishes, effectively forcing his on will the public thru financial power.) and have not started a new one.
FB swears up and down, honest to golly, that they will delete your pic immediately and never ever share or store it, cross our hearts!
If I had to send them a pic of myself I would not do it. Period. Even if that meant no FB account.
First off, FB has lied time and time again about sharing customer data, it's been sued over and over, and there's no proof it's changed its actions no matter what it's stated policies are.
Given FBs recent shift in tone to becoming a site more friendly to extremist views and hostile to dissenting views, I would not put it past fb to share the pics of users who's views were not in line with the views they hold with government, law enforcement, etc. Given the state of politics now I don't think I want the government to have a pic of me given some of the things i post.
I was wondering if anyone else would refuse to give FB their picture or I was the only one.
|
This message was edited 4 times. Last update was at 2020/04/15 11:30:40
"But the universe is a big place, and whatever happens, you will not be missed..." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 11:25:11
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Thane of Dol Guldur
|
I deleted my facebook 2 years ago and have never gone back. their dodgy ethics, bias and censorship of views they dont like despite claiming to be an open platform, are only some of the reasons contributing to my decision.
|
Heresy World Eaters/Emperors Children
Instagram: nagrakali_love_songs |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 11:37:15
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Nasty Nob
Crescent City Fl..
|
It's an interesting question. M major problem with FB is that they collect information on a person even without them having an account. If I could get my fiends and family to move to a different platform i would no longer use FB. I use it for massages and groups mostly.
If I had to send a picture to get an account, which I have never had to do, how would they know it was me and not so other picture. I've painted models, uploaded the picture and their program has wanted me to tag the person in the picture.
I don't know. some times I think it should be turned into a public utility but I would prefer a clone that was a public utility instead.
One think that's been a trend I have heard about over the last few years that really bothers me is employers having some requirement or demand for employees email and FB and I have head pass words. It's outrageous.
|
The rewards of tolerance are treachery and betrayal.
Remember kids, Games Workshop needs you more than you need them. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 11:52:15
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
Honestly FB has some huge shortcomings - its groups feature is primitive compared to even the most basic forum. It's main feature being so widely integrated into modern mobile technology and being so widely used that everyone uses it. It also makes it easier as a company to get customer attention because, you guessed it, everyone uses it so there's no sign-up procedure. Even if all that is is adding a name and password.
As for the whole picture thing that seems odd that they require a photo of a person which they aren't storing. Any scammer can just grab any photo of any person from the internet in moments. Meanwhile unless they are using face recognition you could upload anything since its unlikely that the accounts are being reviewed by a person (even their moderation/reports is only reviewed by a machine half the time or more).
On the employment front the issue is that if you slur your company on FB or you have odd actions they all appear there for the world to see. That's an issue for some companies; or at least an issue they are worried about.
There's also two other aspects:
1) Internet drama can cause huge damage over almost nothing. A tiny action seen online can snowball into an insane situation. Such as the woman who put a cat in a bin. An act many consider bad; but after it did the rounds of the net it escalated into death threats and worse. The potential for things to go nuts is insane and companies fear it because it can blowback onto them.
2) Internet drama is FAST. Over a single day something can go from nothing to mainstream. A weekend could see things escalate into insanity.
Of course as fast as it rises it can fall just as quickly, though the damage can take longer to repair.
FB is a powerful yet also risky tool with benefits and downsides.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 12:12:59
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Matt Swain wrote:FB now demands, with no option to refuse, you send them a pic of your face to get an account.
.
No, they don't.
They sometimes lock existing accounts for suspicious activity and require a photo to be uploaded to prove that the person currently in control of the account is the right person, but I can't find anything about new accounts requiring a photo, and the account I just set up as a test didn't require it.
I think you've got your wires crossed somewhere.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/04/15 12:13:27
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 12:55:27
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
No, I don't. I know some people who have tired to start fb accounts on their desktops and got them up and running, but within a short time were stopped, had the security check screen come up and demand they captcha, then give a number then a picture, there was no option to say no.
A couple people who terminated their accounts some time ago opted to restart years or months later and had the same issue. You may appear to have an account, bu start to use it, join groups, add friends and you'll get the security screen soon.
EDIT: I just tried to check and yes, it demanded a phone number which I didn't give. I have no reason to assume it would not have them demanded a picture. Try setting up an account and actually using it for a while, see if you don;t get the "Hey, c'mere, we got some questions you have to answer." bit.
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2020/04/15 13:59:53
"But the universe is a big place, and whatever happens, you will not be missed..." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 13:33:08
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Battlefield Tourist
MN (Currently in WY)
|
I have a business one. That is it. Not a fan of FB and prefer Message Boards and other Social Media.
I will say, it is great fro reaching 35+ Moms with some money if that is your target market. if it isn't then I would skip it.
|
Support Blood and Spectacles Publishing:
https://www.patreon.com/Bloodandspectaclespublishing |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 13:39:11
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Ridin' on a Snotling Pump Wagon
|
My current FB pic?
Davey Stott. Who is redundant.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 13:40:11
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
I’ve been a Facebook user for years. Never had to submit a photo, or give my phone number.
This sounds like the paranoids.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 14:07:15
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ok, if your account was started years ago you maybe didn' have to give a phone number and face picture. Starting in 2017 fb began experimenting with this. Now, it's becoming widespread.
https://boingboing.net/2017/11/28/facebook-to-demand-clear-pho.html
And another that shows the process was more widespread in 2019.
https://www.quora.com/Why-did-Facebook-ask-me-to-upload-a-photo-of-myself-It-said-they-detected-suspicious-activity-on-my-account
Edit: screencap of what new users face now. Notice there is no decline on no button.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/04/15 14:17:54
"But the universe is a big place, and whatever happens, you will not be missed..." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 14:15:01
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Thane of Dol Guldur
|
It doesnt surprise me. all the apps and social media sites have been trying to up their facial recognition algorithms lately. thats why theres always those 10 year photo challanges going around on insta and facebook. Just poorly disguised attempts to monetise more of your data.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/04/15 14:15:11
Heresy World Eaters/Emperors Children
Instagram: nagrakali_love_songs |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 14:41:49
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Glasgow
|
You have to upload A picture. It doesn't have to be you. I joined in 2018 and whilst it has an image of me now, until around September 2019 it was never a photo, never mind a photo of me!
I have many friends whose images are album covers, miniatures, whatever.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 14:42:00
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Shadowy Grot Kommittee Memba
|
Yeah my only photo on fb for years has been a lego man. I really don't think this is required...
|
"Got you, Yugi! Your Rubric Marines can't fall back because I have declared the tertiary kaptaris ka'tah stance two, after the secondary dacatarai ka'tah last turn!"
"So you think, Kaiba! I declared my Thousand Sons the cult of Duplicity, which means all my psykers have access to the Sorcerous Facade power! Furthermore I will spend 8 Cabal Points to invoke Cabbalistic Focus, causing the rubrics to appear behind your custodes! The Vengeance for the Wronged and Sorcerous Fullisade stratagems along with the Malefic Maelstrom infernal pact evoked earlier in the command phase allows me to double their firepower, letting me wound on 2s and 3s!"
"you think it is you who has gotten me, yugi, but it is I who have gotten you! I declare the ever-vigilant stratagem to attack your rubrics with my custodes' ranged weapons, which with the new codex are now DAMAGE 2!!"
"...which leads you straight into my trap, Kaiba, you see I now declare the stratagem Implacable Automata, reducing all damage from your attacks by 1 and triggering my All is Dust special rule!" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 17:12:06
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
nfe wrote:You have to upload A picture. It doesn't have to be you. I joined in 2018 and whilst it has an image of me now, until around September 2019 it was never a photo, never mind a photo of me!
I have many friends whose images are album covers, miniatures, whatever.
Since this isn't for profile picture but rather to avoid identity fraud doing that risks them...well treaitng it as identity fraud if you get caught.
|
2024 painted/bought: 109/109 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 17:41:08
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Best reason so far to avoid Facebook entirely.
|
CHAOS! PANIC! DISORDER!
My job here is done. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 17:53:00
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Highlord with a Blackstone Fortress
Adrift within the vortex of my imagination.
|
I dont want or have any Facebook account anymore.
|
n'oublie jamais - It appears I now have to highlight this again.
It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. By the juice of the brew my thoughts aquire speed, my mind becomes strained, the strain becomes a warning. It is by tea alone I set my mind in motion. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 18:31:00
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan
|
Matt Swain wrote:Ok, if your account was started years ago you maybe didn' have to give a phone number and face picture. Starting in 2017 fb began experimenting with this. Now, it's becoming widespread.
It shows right in the picture you included "to get back on facebook". This lines up exactly with what Insaniak said - it's for account recovery, not initial account creation.
I also created a new throwaway account and it did not require this.
I mean, if you just want to have a thread complaining about how awful facebook is, we can do that, but this specific hook to hang it on doesn't seem factually accurate.
|
lord_blackfang wrote:Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote:The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 18:50:35
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
I deleted my Facebook account a couple of years ago. No way I'm rejoining to give them yet more of my personal information.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 20:13:55
Subject: Re:If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Last Remaining Whole C'Tan
|
Oh, they don't need you to join to get that.
|
lord_blackfang wrote:Respect to the guy who subscribed just to post a massive ASCII dong in the chat and immediately get banned.
Flinty wrote:The benefit of slate is that its.actually a.rock with rock like properties. The downside is that it's a rock |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 20:21:43
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Yes, and what those links actually say is that this is a security measure to check on accounts that trigger a suspicious activity alert, not a requirement for all new users.
So, as I said, you've got your wires crossed here.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 21:06:51
Subject: Re:If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Again, no. I told you I tried to set up an account and this is what I got while trying to create it, I never made a single post let alone commiotted suspicious activity.
|
"But the universe is a big place, and whatever happens, you will not be missed..." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 21:19:19
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
You said it asked for a phone number, not a pic. And you can enter a nonexistent phone number and have the confirmation code sent to your email instead.
The second link you posted literally saysright there in the URL that the pic request is for when they detect suspicious activity on your account.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 21:32:50
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
insaniak wrote:You said it asked for a phone number, not a pic. And you can enter a nonexistent phone number and have the confirmation code sent to your email instead.
The second link you posted literally says right there in the URL that the pic request is for when they detect suspicious activity on your account.
First is demanded a phone number, then a face pic. It would not let me create an account without both.
Sigh. Look, just try to create and use an account and see what happens. Use it for a few hours, or a couple days. See how long before you get 'pulled over' and told to go through a captach, then give a phone number, then a picture.
|
"But the universe is a big place, and whatever happens, you will not be missed..." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 21:39:11
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Matt Swain wrote:
First is demanded a phone number, then a face pic. It would not let me create an account without both.
That's not what you said before. Specifically:
EDIT: I just tried to check and yes, it demanded a phone number which I didn't give. I have no reason to assume it would not have them demanded a picture.
You just said that you assumed it would ask for a pic, not that it actually did. If it did, it's because you triggered one of their suspicious activity alerts, not because it was a new account. Based on this thread, I would suspect that would have been because you created an account using information that doesn't look right, in which case triggering a security system that is set up specifically to detect accounts that don't look right is exactly what should have happened.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 21:43:58
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Imperial Guard Landspeeder Pilot
On moon miranda.
|
My photo hasn't changed on FB in over a decade (and my FB account doesn't actually use my real correct name), I'm pretty sure it's worthless as a data point as it's at night, I was probably a hundred pounds heavier, my hair basically blends into the background darkness, and there's other people in the shot
My FB activity is so minimal is so totally divorced from the rest of my life that the data they have on me probably isn't worth much, and I use browser plugins to corral what they trawl from my internet surfing. Making their data dirty is a particular joy of mine.
|
IRON WITHIN, IRON WITHOUT.
New Heavy Gear Log! Also...Grey Knights!
The correct pronunciation is Imperial Guard and Stormtroopers, "Astra Militarum" and "Tempestus Scions" are something you'll find at Hogwarts. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 22:02:39
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
Vaktathi wrote:My photo hasn't changed on FB in over a decade (and my FB account doesn't actually use my real correct name), I'm pretty sure it's worthless as a data point as it's at night, I was probably a hundred pounds heavier, my hair basically blends into the background darkness, and there's other people in the shot
Your profile pic isn't the pic under discussion here. There's a security feature where Facebook locks your account of it detects activity that triggers their suspicious activity algorithm and asks you to upload a pic, which they subject to some sort of analysis to verify that you are who you say you are before they unlock your account. I have no idea what that analysis entails, but I suspect it's not just comparing it to your profile pic.
The OP has misconstrued this feature, and assumed it applies to all new accounts.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2020/04/15 22:03:25
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 22:15:43
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Imperial Guard Landspeeder Pilot
On moon miranda.
|
insaniak wrote: Vaktathi wrote:My photo hasn't changed on FB in over a decade (and my FB account doesn't actually use my real correct name), I'm pretty sure it's worthless as a data point as it's at night, I was probably a hundred pounds heavier, my hair basically blends into the background darkness, and there's other people in the shot
Your profile pic isn't the pic under discussion here. There's a security feature where Facebook locks your account of it detects activity that triggers their suspicious activity algorithm and asks you to upload a pic, which they subject to some sort of analysis to verify that you are who you say you are before they unlock your account. I have no idea what that analysis entails, but I suspect it's not just comparing it to your profile pic.
The OP has misconstrued this feature, and assumed it applies to all new accounts.
Ah ok, missed that it was an additional different upload.
|
IRON WITHIN, IRON WITHOUT.
New Heavy Gear Log! Also...Grey Knights!
The correct pronunciation is Imperial Guard and Stormtroopers, "Astra Militarum" and "Tempestus Scions" are something you'll find at Hogwarts. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/15 22:56:55
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
UK
|
It may be to do with enabling the setting that lets you click on your picture to sign in rather than type in a password (it may be autoenabled on phone app versions?) that they keep offering me My photo is a cat and I've chosen to keep typing in passwords but I suspect if I didn't they'd expect to see a human
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2020/04/15 23:00:55
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/16 11:56:57
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ok I'm done with this thread. A. People are telling me something I know is true because I've had it happen to me isn't true, and B. Not one person has answered the question I posted.
|
"But the universe is a big place, and whatever happens, you will not be missed..." |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2020/04/16 12:16:36
Subject: If you HAD to give FB a pic of yourself of not use it anymore, would you?
|
 |
5th God of Chaos! (Yea'rly!)
The Great State of Texas
|
insaniak wrote: Matt Swain wrote:FB now demands, with no option to refuse, you send them a pic of your face to get an account.
.
No, they don't.
They sometimes lock existing accounts for suspicious activity and require a photo to be uploaded to prove that the person currently in control of the account is the right person, but I can't find anything about new accounts requiring a photo, and the account I just set up as a test didn't require it.
I think you've got your wires crossed somewhere.
Send them a picture of the Great and Glorious Oz.
|
-"Wait a minute.....who is that Frazz is talking to in the gallery? Hmmm something is going on here.....Oh.... it seems there is some dispute over video taping of some sort......Frazz is really upset now..........wait a minute......whats he go there.......is it? Can it be?....Frazz has just unleashed his hidden weiner dog from his mini bag, while quoting shakespeares "Let slip the dogs the war!!" GG
-"Don't mind Frazzled. He's just Dakka's crazy old dude locked in the attic. He's harmless. Mostly."
-TBone the Magnificent 1999-2014, Long Live the King!
|
|
 |
 |
|