Switch Theme:

Size question  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Foul Dwimmerlaik






Minneapolis, MN

Or:
Cheaper to buy the oldies.

I want to get some wraithgaurd for my eldar, but am not paying the $15 USD GW wants for each model.

So, I found a sorce to get a lot of old eldar ghost warriors (the original precursors to wraithgaurd). The problem is, the models are onsiderably shorter than wraithgaurd.

Am I going to have a legality issue because of size? Or do you kust assume they occupy the same size category?

Not trying to use modeling to my advantage, just trying to save a few bucks.

   
Made in us
Battlewagon Driver with Charged Engine




Murfreesboro, TN

Your Wraithguard just got built by a union bonesinger shop, and they shorted you on some of the materials... Play the models as they stand. As long as they're GW models, I don't see how anyone can (legitimately) complain.

As a rule of thumb, the designers do not hide "easter eggs" in the rules. If clever reading is required to unlock some sort of hidden option, then it is most likely the result of wishful thinking.

But there's no sense crying over every mistake;
You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.

Member of the "No Retreat for Calgar" Club 
   
Made in ch
Regular Dakkanaut




Zürich

The size makes no difference as they're infantry so size 2, and so long as they are painted GW models no one at a tournement can complain.

-"Subtle is subjective, of course; in a finesseless game like 40K, anything that isn't a brick to the head is downright sneaky..." ->lord_sutekh 
   
Made in us
Plastictrees



Amongst the Stars, In the Night

Actually the Ghost Warriors came out at the same time as what eventually became known as the Wraithlord. Here's the '88 catalog page they appeared in:
War Machines (which shows both Ghost and Spirit warrior robots and the War Walker)
Dreadnaughts (which shows Dreanaughts which were eventually renamed Wraithlords).

 If you're talking about the figs listed as Ghost Warriors, you probably will run into static and definitely if you do any tournies. Personally, I would care less, but then I'm captain lackadasical when it comes to that kind of stuff and only care that someone shows up with some cool looking models.

(as an aside, it is pretty sad that GW is replacing the 18 year old WL with what, for all intents and purposes, appears to be nothing more than a CAD-scanned copy of the original sculpt. :\)

OT Zone: A More Wretched Hive of Scum and Villany
The Loyal Slave learns to Love the Lash! 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Utah (Oh god)

I wouldn't give you any flak. I've got old terminators, 2nd ed marines and so forth so honestly its okay.

Lasguns the new Assault Cannon. 
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User




Colorado Springs, CO

A CAD-scanned copy that is fairly awesome... but I digress.

I wouldn't have a problem with the subsitution. I can shoot through infantry to other infantry or vehicles in V4; it's not like they block line of sight to anything other than Swarms.

Art for the Art God, minis for his throne! 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: