Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Daedricbob wrote:
I think the upshot of this discussion is that it's quite frankly amazing that this STILL hasn't been FAQ'd by GW after all this time.

exactly...

however- it wouldn't hurt if GW had mentioned it in the rulebook regarding invunlerbales saves, all it requires is a line saying "invunerables saves can also be taken on vehicles after taking glancing and penetrating hits..." or something to that effect, what GW rely on in this matter is the often pointed out fact that in pratice you would never play it that way because its a) totally bonkers and b) do you really want to be that arsey?

it still does not excuse GW not proof reading the rules