Switch Theme:

Are missile launchers the "big losers" of 6th? If so, what won?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Poll
What has 6th done to the missile launcher
They are just as good as in 5th.
They took a hit in effectiveness, but are still viable.
They are garbage, and should never be fielded.

View results
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





Of course, those frag missiles pale in comparison to what heavy bolters can do


It all depends on the situation. Yeah, if the target is really spread out a heavy bolter has a chance of getting more hits. On the other hand, if the enemy is clustered up, three missile launchers are more than capable of racking up more hits than three heavy bolters. It all depends on the target, the situation, and the terrain. There is something to be said about forcing your enemy to disperse, possible out of cover, and missiles do that better than many other weapons, certainly better than heavy bolters will. Also unlike h.bolters if you run out of infantry targets, or you're only going to get one model per blast, you can always switch to krak and at least have a chance of hurting light armor, or annoying something heavy.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2013/01/05 20:46:51


 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: