Switch Theme:

Play by Intent: Does Anyone Actually Do This?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in fi
Locked in the Tower of Amareo





 Mr Morden wrote:
Base - to - Base measurement works somewhat but when you start having cover and diffferent levels it can be tricky as it was in Malifaux


Terrain blocks LOS up to X height. If the height is same or more than models stat no LOS as long as base to base line has no path that doesn't go through terrain. If terrain height is less but above half you get obscured bonus.

Simples. And doesn't actively encourage modeling for advantage like 8th ed 40k TLOS does

2024 painted/bought: 109/109 
   
Made in us
Shadowy Grot Kommittee Memba






 Galas wrote:
Heroscape what a great, fun, simple but tactical game. I played if before playing 40k (But not Fantasy) and man.

That game rocked! And the miniatures did came prepainted!


haha, yep, I never had ANY idea what was supposed to be going on in that game but it was incredibly fun, lol. Particularly in the early sets when it was like

Vikings? Aliens? How bout some secret agents? Is this anything? Some ww2 soldier cyborgs? What are you after here kids?

it was basically the perfect gamification of the classic 'take whatever toys you have and make them do a pretend fight'

"Got you, Yugi! Your Rubric Marines can't fall back because I have declared the tertiary kaptaris ka'tah stance two, after the secondary dacatarai ka'tah last turn!"

"So you think, Kaiba! I declared my Thousand Sons the cult of Duplicity, which means all my psykers have access to the Sorcerous Facade power! Furthermore I will spend 8 Cabal Points to invoke Cabbalistic Focus, causing the rubrics to appear behind your custodes! The Vengeance for the Wronged and Sorcerous Fullisade stratagems along with the Malefic Maelstrom infernal pact evoked earlier in the command phase allows me to double their firepower, letting me wound on 2s and 3s!"

"you think it is you who has gotten me, yugi, but it is I who have gotten you! I declare the ever-vigilant stratagem to attack your rubrics with my custodes' ranged weapons, which with the new codex are now DAMAGE 2!!"

"...which leads you straight into my trap, Kaiba, you see I now declare the stratagem Implacable Automata, reducing all damage from your attacks by 1 and triggering my All is Dust special rule!"  
   
Made in us
Storm Trooper with Maglight





Fredericksburg, VA

Yes and no.

The whole idea of: "I intend this tank to be out of your line of sight, let me know where that is," seems silly to me. How would my tank crew know if they are out of your line of sight? They know what they can see, but have no idea what you can see. That just seems gamey and non-immersive to me. Its not like Monty called up Rommel to ask if he could see his tanks before he started firing...

I put it where I think its good, and if its not, that's my bad.

Though if asked by an opponent I'll reply honestly if I can see their unit or not.

I'm not a fan of the "my antennae shoots your banner" malarkey, and even if an opponent pulls this, I'm not going to do the same in return; if I can see something that I consider to be a part that if shot will kill you, I'll shot it, if not, I won't. Being a good sport is on me.
   
Made in ca
Rampaging Carnifex





Toronto, Ontario

 Kcalehc wrote:
Yes and no.

The whole idea of: "I intend this tank to be out of your line of sight, let me know where that is," seems silly to me. How would my tank crew know if they are out of your line of sight? They know what they can see, but have no idea what you can see. That just seems gamey and non-immersive to me. Its not like Monty called up Rommel to ask if he could see his tanks before he started firing...

I put it where I think its good, and if its not, that's my bad.

Though if asked by an opponent I'll reply honestly if I can see their unit or not.

I'm not a fan of the "my antennae shoots your banner" malarkey, and even if an opponent pulls this, I'm not going to do the same in return; if I can see something that I consider to be a part that if shot will kill you, I'll shot it, if not, I won't. Being a good sport is on me.


There is literally nothing at all stopping you from walking over to the opponents side of the board and checking line of sight yourself. By asking the other player you're just saving the hassle of walking over. Had it been that convenient for Rommel or Montgomery I'm sure they would have done the same.
   
Made in us
Storm Trooper with Maglight





Fredericksburg, VA

 creeping-deth87 wrote:


There is literally nothing at all stopping you from walking over to the opponents side of the board and checking line of sight yourself. By asking the other player you're just saving the hassle of walking over. Had it been that convenient for Rommel or Montgomery I'm sure they would have done the same.


I think you completely missed my point. I know I can do that, but it would break my immersion to do so (either ask or go look), so I won't.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: