Why don't models in 40k do cool things?

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**Void__Dragon**

Not Online!!! wrote:

GW' mindset that is failing at chaos since early 2000's has started to infect the players, sadly.

The problem is the way chaos should be handled, as a singular customizable book covering marked and unmarked forces /legions and warbands etc daemons and cults, is not the way GW makes the most reccuring money. That gw makes by incrimentally cutting out books from the main book and putting them up as standalones barely worth their price 2/3rds of the time.

I would be theoretically okay with putting all of Chaos in one big book under the caveat that I could still comfortably play Daemons without CSM. I do not in any shape or form give a single gak about taking spiky marines with my greater daemons.