Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Crikey... that whole page is one giant copyright infringement.

 insaniak wrote:
Crikey... that whole page is one giant copyright infringement.

Yeah, kind of throws a different light on their statement from the article. Reading about the 3D sculptor should also be a reminder to people that they should really be forming limited liability companies when setting up any business, to avoid the potential for your own personal finances to be wrecked by things like lawsuits.

This does also highlight one of the weaknesses of the current legal system when it comes to international copyright. It's weird to me that these cases are being brought in Florida. If they're associated with activity on a specific platform I would have thought the appropriate filing location would be the home state of that business (New York for Etsy, California for Patreon). It does seem to be a bit of a weird quirk of the US legal system that shopping around for a favourable court is even a thing in the first place but it seems to be made worse by the almost total discretion the company filing the lawsuit has in where to bring a case.

 insaniak wrote:
Crikey... that whole page is one giant copyright infringement.

I'm sure someone will be along shortly to tell us that its all fine, evil GW suchforth.

 insaniak wrote:
Crikey... that whole page is one giant copyright infringement.

As long as the original product was also a console controller, right?

That one about the controllers definitely comes across quite different when you actually see what they were selling.

 lord_blackfang wrote:

 insaniak wrote:
Crikey... that whole page is one giant copyright infringement.

As long as the original product was also a console controller, right?

Copying someone's artwork onto a controller is no different to copying someone's artwork onto dice, or t-shirts, or posters, or whatever. They're using someone else's IP to make custom controllers, and selling them as "[IP Name] Custom Controller". They have absolutely no legal leg to stand on here.

beast_gts wrote:

 insaniak wrote:
going by the story the sales figure GW have arrived at for the BeetleDash one is questionable.

Someone on Reddit pointed out they'd been selling multiple items - Wayback Machine

Pretty damning proof that they were totally lying in that other article.

This seems strangely appropriate for this whole topic:

Understanding is a three edged sword: your side, their side, and the truth.
J. Michael Straczynski

 Orkeosaurus wrote:

beast_gts wrote:

 insaniak wrote:
going by the story the sales figure GW have arrived at for the BeetleDash one is questionable.

Someone on Reddit pointed out they'd been selling multiple items - Wayback Machine

Pretty damning proof that they were totally lying in that other article.

Yeah, from the article I was almost willing to be on that dude's side, but then I saw the rest of his shop. That's a hard 'Nope!' from me.

Slipspace wrote:
It's weird to me that these cases are being brought in Florida.

The law firm GW have contracted this out to (Brickell IP Group) is based in Florida (Miami & Tampa), so that's a possible reason - sympathetic courts are another.

Florida is one of the few states that allow such a lawsuit in the first place, that is why GW hired a firm in Florida to file that case there

 BorderCountess wrote:

 Orkeosaurus wrote:

beast_gts wrote:

 insaniak wrote:
going by the story the sales figure GW have arrived at for the BeetleDash one is questionable.

Someone on Reddit pointed out they'd been selling multiple items - Wayback Machine

Pretty damning proof that they were totally lying in that other article.

Yeah, from the article I was almost willing to be on that dude's side, but then I saw the rest of his shop. That's a hard 'Nope!' from me.

This sort of thing always happens with these situations. Someone making out they did nothing wrong and it's not their fault, which the community then believes at face value and goes "GW BAD!", when actually looking at it it's definitely not how they made it out to be.

Happened with some of the recent animation claims a few months ago too.

beast_gts wrote:

 insaniak wrote:
going by the story the sales figure GW have arrived at for the BeetleDash one is questionable.

Someone on Reddit pointed out they'd been selling multiple items - Wayback Machine

Lmao look at all those copyrighted icons, I’m surprised they aren’t being sued by more companies tbh

For some whilst its copyright material its not a market they are directly invested into specifically so they either don't care or don't realise.

Much like how GW gave a blight look at videos on youtube until they got more invested into that market and came to shut down those profiting from them.

GW are hot on this because its 100% their direct market sector.