Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Don't all the downloadable codices come with the ability for GW to update the rules in the file at any time? Or was that some sort of ipad-only thing?

Just wondering because having any FAQs or updates automatically append themselves to my codex so I don't have to look them up all the time would make these e-codices worth buying for me.

 timetowaste85 wrote:


So...Chapterhouse may or may not have murdered its wife?

The lack of a formal "guilty" verdict may or may not prove that no crime was actually committed?

 Zweischneid wrote:

 timetowaste85 wrote:


So...Chapterhouse may or may not have murdered its wife?

The lack of a formal "guilty" verdict may or may not prove that no crime was actually committed?

Zweis, some levity was needed. You're effectively trying to kill it. Should start calling YOU OJ. But then if you and Chapterhouse are both OJ...what a twist!!


Ps, I got a three hour nap between work yesterday and startin work before the sun came up today. I'm overtired, and nobody should take anything I say today seriously. I'm in "a mood".

 Zweischneid wrote:
In the spirit of mutual reciprocity of said prophet, criticize everyone on dakka who ever voices a non-100% factual-proof-based critique of GW with the same fervor that you just prosecuted my criticisms of Chapterhouse, and your self-proclaimed status as "watchdog of integer criticism" would have - as you called it - credibility.

Do you take me for a puppet? I don't dance to your fiddle, good sir, just as I have no doubt whatsoever that you would not do me the same courtesy, were our positions reversed. Whether or not you consider my actions indicative of credibility ranks somewhere slightly below distress over mismatched socks in my current list of priorities, so pardon me if I don't immediately leap to the rescue of my questionable reputation on the say-so of a two-bit prancing harlequin riding the hobby horse of dubious criminality up and down the fields in the guise of a crusading knight but without even the spurs to press his case, nevermind a sword to slay his dragon.

As the worn phrase goes, we must "agree to disagree", else we render this forum unpalatable, and tender fools of ourselves in the attempt, winning neither glory, acclaim or even the momentary satisfaction of a battle hard fought.

 Agamemnon2 wrote:


Do you take me for a puppet? I don't dance to your fiddle, good sir, just as I have no doubt whatsoever that you would not do me the same courtesy, were our positions reversed. Whether or not you consider my actions indicative of credibility ranks somewhere slightly below distress over mismatched socks in my current list of priorities, so pardon me if I don't immediately leap to the rescue of my questionable reputation on the say-so of a two-bit prancing harlequin riding the hobby horse of dubious criminality up and down the fields in the guise of a crusading knight but without even the spurs to press his case, nevermind a sword to slay his dragon.

As the worn phrase goes, we must "agree to disagree", else we render this forum unpalatable, and tender fools of ourselves in the attempt, winning neither glory, acclaim or even the momentary satisfaction of a battle hard fought.

I suppose you just worded the perfect response to your own presumptuous posts on the last page: http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/1260/560383.page#6258811

And back OT digital editions have confirmed that lacking las/auto guns wasnt an oversight (will be run as pistol ccw combo for my henchmen now.). Say what you will they responded to the rules question quickly and concisely when asked.

O, I am slain by my own sesquipedalian locquaciousness! Cursed be my penchant for elaborate and bombastic circumlocution! Alas! Alaaaas!

*dies*

PS: The word you're looking for is "pompous", not "presumptuous", but A for effort.

Aggy, for some reason you remind me of a pissed off William Shakespeare. Or a drunk Shakespeare. I'll let you decide which it is.

 Agamemnon2 wrote:
O, I am slain by my own sesquipedalian locquaciousness! Cursed be my penchant for elaborate and bombastic circumlocution! Alas! Alaaaas!

*dies*

PS: The word you're looking for is "pompous", not "presumptuous", but A for effort.

Don't let Mrs Malaprop stop now.... That was too fun.

 Agamemnon2 wrote:
O, I am slain by my own sesquipedalian locquaciousness! Cursed be my penchant for elaborate and bombastic circumlocution! Alas! Alaaaas!

*dies*

PS: The word you're looking for is "pompous", not "presumptuous", but A for effort.

Would "bumptious" be agreeable? I apologize if my loquaciousness (not locquaciousness) as of yet lacks sophistication. As you clearly got the general meaning however, nitpicking vocabulary appears to be distraction from the contentious argument of whether or not somebody's credibility (however defined) is subject to the vetting of another, or not? Either way, I am certain you agree that the answer to the latter would have to stand both ways, no?

 Badablack wrote:
Don't all the downloadable codices come with the ability for GW to update the rules in the file at any time? Or was that some sort of ipad-only thing?

Just wondering because having any FAQs or updates automatically append themselves to my codex so I don't have to look them up all the time would make these e-codices worth buying for me.

You have to manually redownload the BL version but you can do so at any time.

 Kroothawk wrote:
Meaning that you can't buy any models for them from GW. So both Codices are more a ploy to sell off old stock than a show of real interest in both armies.

LOL, who buys those models when making their henchmen? Most people kitbash as they should.

Super Newb wrote:

 Kroothawk wrote:
Meaning that you can't buy any models for them from GW. So both Codices are more a ploy to sell off old stock than a show of real interest in both armies.

LOL, who buys those models when making their henchmen? Most people kitbash as they should.

I think he's talking about the metal Inquisitor models.

And if it really is the case then we should be expecting them to be getting something in the future, same with Sisters, or else GW basically shoots it's own foot off for no reason.

Most people seem to kitbash their HQs too. Isn't that the whole point of the Inquisition, to make up your own dudes?

This thread is so off course.

Well the codex is out already so not sure why this thread keeps going lol

 Byte wrote:
This thread is so off course.

There you go, back on course.

Super Newb wrote:
Most people seem to kitbash their HQs too. Isn't that the whole point of the Inquisition, to make up your own dudes?

For normal players anyway. Not so sure about powergamers who take them only for bare minimum powers.


Automatically Appended Next Post:

 ClockworkZion wrote:
And if it really is the case then we should be expecting them to be getting something in the future, same with Sisters, or else GW basically shoots it's own foot off for no reason.

Remember, Games Workshop is afraid of money that doesn't come from Space Marines.

OK now that it's out I think we can close this and move discussion of tactics, army lists and whining to the appropriate forums.

Obviously if there is real news like an update to the file or FAQ please start a new thread here.

So by the power invested in my by the most hold mod-quisition I declare this thread closed.