Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

You can now ram buildings, That is just so awesome and something I've wanted to do since 5th ed

 Celtic Strike wrote:
Who thought Stubborn was a re-roll? Really? Sister's characters have Stubborn too. So does Lysander. It's not that rare, or hard to read the rulebook.

Hey no need to be mean not everyone comes across every rule I mean I dont think i have had a single game where the zealot rule has come into it and there are sooo many rules its easy to make a mistake

- Results may not always lose a hullpoint. If a weapon effect does not specify that it loses a hull point it just takes the result and not the hull point

So this just means that the vehicle only looses the 1 hull point from a penetrating hit, or does it "negate" the hull point, meaning the vehicle only suffers the result of the damage table?

on p. 347 of BRB it talks of hull points when penetrating a vehicle.

Glancing and penetrating hits remove a hull point.

Entropic strike does not remove a hull point inherently(although it does make it easier to glance or pen

Grave weapons do remove a hull point because that is what their rules say.)