Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I'll bet you guys would be a kick in the ass to actually play with. Some, if not exactly the most logical, are incredibly well spoken.

As an addendum to that, anyone here who is a Celtics fan I highly suspect as being chaos. I mean come on...KG? Heretic and traitor for sure.

I still think you shouldn't have the right to vote, but only because you didn't want it.

Hey Drk_O, you're in the zombie RP right?

And I post again.

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:Unvote: BishopGore

I'm going to try something alittle different.

Paul and Lan, you're both voting for no lynch.

I'm going to vote for one of you.

So, explain why I shouldn't vote for you, and explain why you continue to vote no lynch.

You shouldn't vote for either.

Lan has IG in his first name, which stands for IS not GUILTY so obviously he isn't guilty.
Paul has Atreides in his name which stands for After Thoroughly Remembering Everything I Deemed Everyone Sinister, which means he suspect all of us and if he suspects all of us he is obviously the inquisitor and you don't want to vote off the inquisitor do you?

halonachos wrote:Hey Drk_O, you're in the zombie RP right?

Yep, I'm the guy with one arm

halonachos wrote:

You shouldn't vote for either.

Lan has IG in his first name, which stands for IS not GUILTY so obviously he isn't guilty.
Paul has Atreides in his name which stands for After Thoroughly Remembering Everything I Deemed Everyone Sinister, which means he suspect all of us and if he suspects all of us he is obviously the inquisitor and you don't want to vote off the inquisitor do you?

Egads, you have a point! I'll definately have to consider it carefully when assessing my decision!

One arm, how did that happen. I know I've been missing a lot, but I didn't know someone had their arm blown off.

Never mind, just saw it. Geez, I really need to pay more attention to the RP.

IGLannister wrote:I'll bet you guys would be a kick in the ass to actually play with. Some, if not exactly the most logical, are incredibly well spoken.

Personally I enjoy swearing, swearing loudly, blurting out random imperial quotes, ramming stuff with my leman russ's, and most importantly making the space marines the front line defence every once in awhile.

I played an apocalypse game and held everything save one basilisk in reserve. The look on the eldar, grey knights, and orks players' faces as they created a front line defence against a 10,000 point dark angels army.

Halonachos: You, Sir, are a fine individual. I applaud you heartily.

The best part is, my baneblade was also in reserve.

Oh, and eldar cannot hold a defensive line worth diddly.

TherVadam wrote:Then voice those opinions. If you want to help town (or I guess, appear to be helping, depending on your role), then tell us who you think is... bad (definitely think i could've found a better word there)

I am town. Its just like I said, I only have feelings to base it on noit facts or real suspicions.

I have been rather remiss in my posting, apologies for that. Life rather gets in the way of games at times. Before I get started, I am going down to London this weekend, so I shan't be posting until Sunday night at the earliest, after today.

Right, so, lots has happened! I've updated my .txt file with a few bits and pieces and have taken down a bunch of things I should comment on.

Halo wrote:While I would doubt that anyone would like to be voted for and probed with questioning. I really do not see what you are getting at though. All of your "probes" were incredibly mislead and I could easily counter them. You criticized my votes and I explained every one of them with logic, while you were saying that I was voting against those who were logical.

...

I do find your questioning odd though. I have alluded to it a bit in previous posts, but why do you insist on targeting me and not those who have done likewise? Because out of all I have seen, you have just created the same straw-man argument that I created in my conviction of Drk_O.

As with everything in the RVS phase, and indeed for much of the game, almost every suspicion can be countered with logic. However you are correct, my 'probe' was not very well thought out. I tend to act quickly and not really put a lot of time into early voting, because I don't feel it matters. My apologies for using such a weak attack against you, I probably underestimated your abilities and shall try not to do so again. Negative one for me for lack of forethought and a weak premise.

Syphonious wrote:((Thanks to Bishop for the advice about word!))

I was useful! Yay!

Halo wrote:The way I look at it, this is a difficult game for me to start. There are not just two teams, there are 3 teams. The good, the bad, and the evil. I'm trying to find patterns of people who are sticking with each other and trying to group them. That's what I'm doing and I guess that that's not a good idea.

It's a difficult game for us all, but yes, you have definitely been thrown in at the deep end here.
Actually, the way you've been handling this game so far has been excellent. You've been drawing people together, making joins between potentials, voicing suspicions and getting others involved. No comment can be overlooked in this game, otherwise you run the risk of missing something. Despite being a newcomer I actually think your contributions so far have been exemplary. The only problem is the sheer amount of posts you're creating is making others voices much quieter, which makes it hard to read anyone but yourself. This is not a bad thing, it's just why people are focussing some attention on you, you're the loudest by far!

TherVadam wrote:BishopGore seems to be different as DRK said, but so does DRK, actually forming coherent thoughts and driving conversation as opposed to his normal method (supposedly) of distraction. For the moment, however, I think both of them are relatively good for driving forward the conversation and we definitely do not want the conversation to stagnate on the first day.

I was actually going to comment about this myself until I saw your comment, so figured I'd add to it rather than repeat it. Drk_O has been amazing well behaved and generally building the conversation up rather than trying to tear it down. This actually makes me more suspicious of him, as when he was last innocent he was bored and making trouble. Is he a wild card like Stynier claims to be, playing each game differently, or does he have a role that makes him act differently? Hard to tell with him.

Syphonious wrote:It is really hard to come up with an attack this early that cannot be easily countered...

On Day 1 it is next to impossible to come up with anything that can't be countered. But that doesn't mean you can't have suspicions. In my first game I had gut feelings about Lord-Loss and pursued them relentlessly, and I was correct about him, though there was no actual evidence to go on. Sometimes it's about reading between the lines, which is something that is impossible to quote

Scott wrote:I am town. Its just like I said, I only have feelings to base it on noit facts or real suspicions.

If you are town, then aid town by speaking up about your feelings. Pro-town players are meant to share everything, keep everyone informed. Keeping things back means that you may have had a great idea, based on no evidence, and then die in the night and never be able to reveal it to us. That would hurt those of us who are also pro-town while aiding those who are are scum.
If, however, you actually have no idea who to point the finger at and are saying you have feelings because you feel stupid, well, don't! I haven't got a clue who to vote for, hence the last vote for Lord-Loss which I immediately rescinded. So if you're stupid then I'm stupid too, and that seems a little harsh of you to say that!

I think that is pretty much everything I have to say. There are, as has been said, so many conflicting voices that I find myself quite lost, like Alice, falling down the rabbit hole. I'm taking the blue pill, by the way. Life is complicated enough!

BishopGore wrote:

TherVadam wrote:BishopGore seems to be different as DRK said, but so does DRK, actually forming coherent thoughts and driving conversation as opposed to his normal method (supposedly) of distraction. For the moment, however, I think both of them are relatively good for driving forward the conversation and we definitely do not want the conversation to stagnate on the first day.

I was actually going to comment about this myself until I saw your comment, so figured I'd add to it rather than repeat it. Drk_O has been amazing well behaved and generally building the conversation up rather than trying to tear it down. This actually makes me more suspicious of him, as when he was last innocent he was bored and making trouble. Is he a wild card like Stynier claims to be, playing each game differently, or does he have a role that makes him act differently? Hard to tell with him.

I believe he (Drk_O) is just mixing up his style, who knows he could be saving the random babble until the right moment (like when I'm dead and not around to persecute him). I expected him to change his style somewhat after the past few games to avoid being targeted as quickly as the others, he is after all a veteran now, and one of the senior most players this match. I have to give him some credit, though cutting out most of the babble like he has this time is odd for him. Perhaps one of the followers of Chaos or a Cautious Inquisitor?

Myself, I'm not usually too much of a wild card, I often play with some similarities to past games. Though frequently one thing changes about the style.

Once again, I see Bio adding to the hunt for the renegades, a little more so than I recall him doing last game. Though you could have done the same last game and I was just too busy perusing my interests.

halonachos wrote:The best part is, my baneblade was also in reserve.

Oh, and eldar cannot hold a defensive line worth diddly.

Nil ann ach cleasai, agus tá an iomad measa aige air féin.

Current votes

the_ferrett -0
ginger_nid_dude -1
VikingScott -0
Scarper -0
Lord-Loss -0
Drk_0blitr8r -1
Inquisitor_Syphonious -1
Paul Atreides -0
BishopGore -0
Arheiner -0
Karon -1
Fifty -1
Halonachos -0
Steempunk -0
BrotherStynier -0
IGLannister -2
TherVadam -0
No Lynch -1

With 17 alive 9 are required to lynch. Yet if this day phase were to run out of time the target with the most votes would go. That would be Lan at the moment.

It's Friday now leaving 10 days including today.
Vote log
Sorted like this voter (target)

Drk_0 (Ferret)
Halo (Drk_0)
Scott (Halo)
Nid (Scott)
50 (Nid)
Halo (Unvote Drk_0)
LL (50)
Syph (Drk_0)
Halo (Scott)
Lan (Scott)
Nid (unvote Scott)
Lan (unvote Scott)
Lan (No Lynch)
Scott (Unvote Halo)
Bishop (Ferret)
Bishop (unvote Ferret)
Scarper (Bishop)
Halo (unvote Scott)
Halo (No Lynch)
Drk_0 (unvote Ferret)
Drk_0 (Bishop)
Arhiener (Syph)
Paul (No Lynch)
Stynier (Karon)
Scarp (Unvote Bishop)
Halo (Unvote No Lynch)
Halo (Stynier)
Bishop (Halo)
Halo (Unvote Stynier)
Bishop's joke votes (not sure if he's still voting for halo, but I'm going to say he isn't until he does again )
NEW
Drk_0 (Unvote Bishop)
TherVadem (Lan)
Nid (Lan)
Lan (Unvote No Lynch)

Stynier, into Drk_Oblit actually does something suspicous, then you should stop this man hunt for him. He's been posting constructively and you dshould forcus on someone who has actually done something suspicous. :/

BrotherStynier wrote:Once again, I see Bio adding to the hunt for the renegades, a little more so than I recall him doing last game. Though you could have done the same last game and I was just too busy perusing my interests.

Am I Bio? I can't work out who else you might mean. If you do mean me, then the game we played together I was not really paying much attention, due to being in 2 games at once.

Stynier, into Drk_Oblit actually does something suspicous, then you should stop this man hunt for him. He's been posting constructively and you dshould forcus on someone who has actually done something suspicous. :/

Another move to protect Drk_O after your attack on Halo for daring to think Drk_O and Scott might be linked... I think this is a little suspicious LL. I understand that you want to keep things moving, maybe, but Stynier wasn't even attacking Drk_O, he was making positive commentary. You don't seem to like us talking about Drk_O too much.

Interesting.

BishopGore wrote:

Stynier, into Drk_Oblit actually does something suspicous, then you should stop this man hunt for him. He's been posting constructively and you dshould forcus on someone who has actually done something suspicous. :/

Another move to protect Drk_O after your attack on Halo for daring to think Drk_O and Scott might be linked... I think this is a little suspicious LL. I understand that you want to keep things moving, maybe, but Stynier wasn't even attacking Drk_O, he was making positive commentary. You don't seem to like us talking about Drk_O too much.

Interesting.

Bishop, if you look gentley into the past, Lord-Loss is always like that.

Not that I don't totally appreciate it, cause it's superspecialawesome

Drk_Oblitr8r wrote:Bishop, if you look gentley into the past, Lord-Loss is always like that.

Not that I don't totally appreciate it, cause it's superspecialawesome

Lord Loss always comes to your defence? Or he's always suspicious? Because I have noticed the latter

Unvote: No lynch

I wouldn't want to be the only one voting no lynch now, would I?

Paul Atreides wrote:I wouldn't want to be the only one voting no lynch now, would I?

I don't know, would you?

How did voting No Lynch make you feel?

Are you not aware that IGLannister is being stubborn about it and still voting No Lynch?

If a cat is rotated fast enough, does all its fur stand on end?

I'm always defending people equally and wanting some quote evidence, or something before even thinking about a lynch.

I don't like the way you've simply jumped on Drk_Oblit and without any evidence.

It's seeming to become some sort of trend with you guys. >_:

I don't think eitjer Steempunk or Karon has posted yet.

Prod?

I have, but I have seen Karon around the place so either they didn't get the PMs or simply don't have the etiquette required to simply reply. Another one is they might have hit the ignore button either intentionally or accidentally; as it's right next to the friend button.

You can prod them both for me if you like. This would be their last chance then they're gone; as it would have ruled out all the possible reasons why they have not yet posted, besides that they simply changed thier mind and didn't want to play afterall.

That would take it down to 15.
Wouldn't that make the teams imbalanced though?

This will probably stir things up but ah well


Vote: BrotherStynier

I have my suspicions.

VikingScott wrote:That would take it down to 15.
Wouldn't that make the teams imbalanced though?

Nah, some townies will probably just get some role PM's, being substituted in. Or some of the reserves will come in, like TherVadam.

VikingScott wrote:This will probably stir things up but ah well


Vote: BrotherStynier

I have my suspicions.

You have suspicions? Heresy.

First I would like to ask not_u for a translation.

Secondly I would like to thank bishop for the complement, I was wondering if I was pushing people too aggressively and ruining the game for others.

Thirdly, LL you have lied. You haven't defended me at all, although you did explain why.

I want to hear scott's reason's for voting on brother stynier though. I voted for him to try and coerce him to speak and maybe to slip up.

We have one more week before the day phase ends right?

Another thing, I have a sure-fire way to test for innocence in this game, it is 100% guaranteed to work.

SCOTT, as I understand you would prefer to be called, could you explain your suspicions? Explaining what you mean would really help town, because as of right now, just voting Brother Stynier does not help us very much. Even if all you have are suspicions, try and see if they are based around anything.

Let's say Stynier gets lynched:

If he flips town, then you seem like a demon who, as I understand it, knows everyone on the "evil" side, and could accurately predict such things.

If he flips cultists, then you could still be a demon, and you just might not want the cooperation of the cultists, or just a lucky townie.

If he flips demons, then I got nothing.

What's important, however, is that nothing here really helps you, and I'm getting a relatively good vibe. I think you're just a part of town, who's a little pushy about getting probed, like me *shifting eyes quickly* lol. Anyway, if you want to help town (or I guess pretend), you really need to voice things.

Halo, same to you. Also, is that an Inquisitor claim, or you just think you have some great way of helping?