Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Karol wrote:
Yeah but from the way it looks right now, someone calling out a cheater publiclly is branded as being at least just as bad as the cheater himself, regardless of the repution the cheater has.

Two wrongs simply don't make a right.
Cheating is bad.
Calling out people by their real names on the internet is bad.

If you do either, you're scum, no matter the reason.

Just do a little research what happens to people that got their personal information posted. Stuff ordered to their place, swat teams called, death threats, family members being threatened, breaking up families, people being forced to move, change/lose their job, leave the country, people getting psychic illnesses over all the things happening up to them commiting suicide.

I think this whole thread needs to be nuked from orbit. We can all do better as grown men.

Okay, how about we set up a rematch! But with cameras and rule uudges everywhere. Then we will see... then we will see.

 BaconCatBug wrote:

Medicinal Carrots wrote:
If I go to a rough neighborhood and get mugged, the mugger is at fault. I may be dumb for having gone there or not taken precautions, but the mugger is still the only one who deserves jail time.

And this is where we fundamentally disagree. Yes, the mugger is the only one who deserves jail time, but he isn't the only one to blame. Call me old fashioned, but I am of the opinion that if you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes.

"Old fashioned" is not the phrase I'd use to describe that attitude. I can't use the phrase I want to, so let's settle for calling it abhorrent. Your attitude is exactly the same as the one that states a woman who dresses provocatively is at fault for being sexually assaulted. If you truly believe that you need to take a long, hard look at your attitude towards...well, everything.

Slipspace wrote:

 BaconCatBug wrote:

Medicinal Carrots wrote:
If I go to a rough neighborhood and get mugged, the mugger is at fault. I may be dumb for having gone there or not taken precautions, but the mugger is still the only one who deserves jail time.

And this is where we fundamentally disagree. Yes, the mugger is the only one who deserves jail time, but he isn't the only one to blame. Call me old fashioned, but I am of the opinion that if you play stupid games, you win stupid prizes.

"Old fashioned" is not the phrase I'd use to describe that attitude. I can't use the phrase I want to, so let's settle for calling it abhorrent. Your attitude is exactly the same as the one that states a woman who dresses provocatively is at fault for being sexually assaulted. If you truly believe that you need to take a long, hard look at your attitude towards...well, everything.

Way to put words in my mouth. This is why nothing can ever be discussed these days, because people like you poison the well like it's going out of style.

We're talking about a toy soldier game for children, get a grip.

Okay, we are done here.