| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2007/09/24 12:16:37
Subject: Mystics Vs. Hawks
|
|
Uhlan
|
Deamonhunters mystics and Swooping hawk grenades. Who wins? Here's the background with out quotes as I don't have a Eldar Codex to reference. So when swooping hawks DS they drop a template bomb. Mystics allow shots at deep striking units. If the Swooping hawk greneades kill the mystics, then do they still get to shoot the hawks? Cam up in my 'Ard tournament. The judge went for a quick ruling and ruled on the side of init score. Hawks easily beating the mystics. I didn't mind this on the spot call, but would like to here some arguements for or against. Because I think each judge would give diffrent answers.
|
I play  + |
|
|
 |
|
2007/09/24 14:35:01
Subject: RE: Mystics Vs. Hawks
|
|
[MOD]
Making Stuff
|
I see no reason that both things shouldn't happen simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007/09/24 16:05:36
Subject: RE: Mystics Vs. Hawks
|
|
Incorporating Wet-Blending
|
I agree with insaniak.
|
Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
2007/09/24 17:15:25
Subject: RE: Mystics Vs. Hawks
|
|
[ARTICLE MOD]
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ditto.
|
"I was not making fun of you personally - I was heaping scorn on an inexcusably silly idea - a practice I shall always follow." - Lt. Colonel Dubois, Starship Troopers
Don't settle for the pewter horde! Visit http://www.bkarmypainting.com and find out how you can have a well-painted army quickly at a reasonable price. |
|
|
|
|
2007/09/24 22:13:05
Subject: RE: Mystics Vs. Hawks
|
|
Dakka Veteran
the spire of angels
|
id vote for simo as well since the mystics power is supposed to let you shoot a DS/summoned unit before they can even do anything like move or shoot back since you know where they are going to be.
|
"victory needs no explanation, defeat allows none" |
|
|
|
|
2007/09/24 22:27:28
Subject: RE: Mystics Vs. Hawks
|
|
Executing Exarch
|
Sure, but Hawks don't fire the gren pack. You just place the marker "any time a Swooping Hawk unit uses its Deep Strike ability". Insaniak has it right.
In fact, how are the mystic rules phrased? Depending on exactly when they get to shoot, it is conceivable that the gren pack would happen earlier. Can anyone give a quote?
|
Wehrkind wrote:Sounds like a lot, but with a little practice I can do ~7-8 girls in 2-3 hours. Probably less if the cat and wife didn't want attention in that time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
