Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

1. Personally I use missile launchers, simply because of cheaper cost and range (not to mention the S4 AP4 pinning 3" template). Now that said you're probably going to want a couple of bright lances somewhere, and you'll have to decide where, vypers are just as good a place as any. If you like Fire Prisms over Falcons that goes a long way towards helping your anti-tank.

2. Some people argue this but I would argue against it for two reasons. #1 It would be better to spread out your anti-tank/anti-infantry. If your opponent takes out your Wave Serpent with both brightlances and Fire Dragons then you're stuck without anti-tank. On the other hand I like Shuricannons on Wave Serpent simply because they are cheaper and the Wave Serpent is an assault tank anyway and the shorter range doesn't matter.

You're concerned about your anti-tank, don't forget a Jetbike Warlock with a Singing Spear adds a great deal of versatility to a Saim-Hann list.

Anarchyman99 wrote:Tacobake = My new "go-to" guy on all things Eldar.

I'm cool. There's lots of Eldar players here, though.