Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

After playing a game in which I used daemonhosts, I thought back and wondered if I had used an illegal configuration. I had a WH inquisitor Lord and was using the Daemonhosts as allies. Do I specifically need a DH inquisitor to use a daemonhost, or any inquisitor, so long as no Grey Knights are present in both cases?

Thanks.

It's a GW rule.

It isn't clear.

Personally, I could care less ruleswise.

It does seem to go directly against the fluff of Sisters, who are about as anti-chaos/psyker as grey knights are.

Without the crappy ruleset of the DH, of course.

That said, I don't believe it's been FAQ'd so you must bring a DH inquisitor...so you can.

Thanks Stelek.

As for fluff, my WH armies are always sans sisters, my lists with Daemonhosts are Inquisitors, stormies, and assassins of various types. Long live the radical.