| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2008/05/19 18:25:16
Subject: khorne vs slaneesh units, which more efficient?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I am in the process of building an army and am kind of torn between couple of khorne and slaanesh units:
Hounds vs Seekers:
Hounds got better stats while seekers got lower stats but has rend and more attack. Is a mix of this a good idea or have all seekers/hounds?
Bloodletters vs daemonettes:
Bloodletters aren't as fast but they can be a beast in CC if they get there. Daemonettes got rending and can probably get to the enemy faster than the bloodletters. split?
crushers vs fiends :
crushers is more durable but fiends are insanely fast and can probably get to 1-2 more units than crushers. Crushers will probably finish up units faster than fiends.
Any input on these units?
|
|
|
 |
|
2008/05/19 18:33:59
Subject: khorne vs slaneesh units, which more efficient?
|
|
Executing Exarch
|
Not a YMDC thread.
|
Wehrkind wrote:Sounds like a lot, but with a little practice I can do ~7-8 girls in 2-3 hours. Probably less if the cat and wife didn't want attention in that time.
|
|
|
|
|
2008/05/20 06:41:15
Subject: khorne vs slaneesh units, which more efficient?
|
|
Infiltrating Oniwaban
|
EDIT: Nevermind.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/05/20 06:46:48
Infinity: Way, way better than 40K and more affordable to boot!
"If you gather 250 consecutive issues of White Dwarf, and burn them atop a pyre of Citadel spray guns, legend has it Gwar will appear and answer a single rules-related question. " -Ouze |
|
|
|
|
2008/05/23 06:23:38
Subject: khorne vs slaneesh units, which more efficient?
|
|
Been Around the Block
|
In 4th there all fairly equal, once rending gets nerfed Khorne is going to pull way ahead. Slannesh simply wont be able to do enough damage to justify how fragile they are. Against marines one in twelve attacks will rend in fifth, that doesn't chew up enough of the enemy not to get creamed by the return attacks, considering deamonettes and seekers are as survivable as guardsmen and fiends aren't that much better. Khorne all the way.
|
|
|
|
|
2008/05/23 06:56:11
Subject: Re:khorne vs slaneesh units, which more efficient?
|
|
Combat Jumping Rasyat
|
Seekers will still be better then Hounds in 5th. Same WS, better Init, more attacks, rending plus Aura for a measly 2 pts. Bloodcrusher movement kind of limits their uses beyond augmenting the hitting power of Bloodletters, while Fiends can reach out and tie up heavy weapons squads.
But yeah Bloodletters in 5th.
|
|
|
|
|
2008/05/25 10:13:18
Subject: khorne vs slaneesh units, which more efficient?
|
|
Killer Klaivex
|
I dunno about the seekers/hounds, but I'd go Bloodletters over Daemonettes, because of the changes to rending in 5th. And besides, who doesn't want a 10-man squad with a SM statline, 5+ inv save, and power weapons? I'm seeing something that might stand up to pariahs here...
|
People are like dice, a certain Frenchman said that. You throw yourself in the direction of your own choosing. People are free because they can do that. Everyone's circumstances are different, but no matter how small the choice, at the very least, you can throw yourself. It's not chance or fate. It's the choice you made. |
|
|
|
|
2008/05/26 22:05:33
Subject: khorne vs slaneesh units, which more efficient?
|
|
Phanobi
|
Because we all need something to stand up to those cheezy Pariahs. 
Ozymandias, King of Kings
|
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings.
Look on My works, Ye Mighty, and despair.
Chris Gohlinghorst wrote:Holy Space Marine on a Stick.
This conversation has even begun to boggle my internet-hardened mind.
A More Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy |
|
|
|
|
2008/05/27 19:49:11
Subject: khorne vs slaneesh units, which more efficient?
|
|
Executing Exarch
|
But who will save us from Repentia?
|
Wehrkind wrote:Sounds like a lot, but with a little practice I can do ~7-8 girls in 2-3 hours. Probably less if the cat and wife didn't want attention in that time.
|
|
|
|
|
2008/05/28 00:03:33
Subject: khorne vs slaneesh units, which more efficient?
|
|
Phanobi
|
I hear Ogryns are the perfect foil to Repentia.
Ozymandias, King of Kings
|
My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings.
Look on My works, Ye Mighty, and despair.
Chris Gohlinghorst wrote:Holy Space Marine on a Stick.
This conversation has even begun to boggle my internet-hardened mind.
A More Wretched Hive of Scum and Villainy |
|
|
|
|
2008/05/29 05:12:45
Subject: khorne vs slaneesh units, which more efficient?
|
|
Killer Klaivex
|
Repentia? Blast weapons maybe? Slaaneshi Lords with Blissgiver?
|
People are like dice, a certain Frenchman said that. You throw yourself in the direction of your own choosing. People are free because they can do that. Everyone's circumstances are different, but no matter how small the choice, at the very least, you can throw yourself. It's not chance or fate. It's the choice you made. |
|
|
|
|
2008/05/29 11:10:47
Subject: khorne vs slaneesh units, which more efficient?
|
|
Executing Exarch
|
Roflcopters with dual lolcannons?
|
Wehrkind wrote:Sounds like a lot, but with a little practice I can do ~7-8 girls in 2-3 hours. Probably less if the cat and wife didn't want attention in that time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
