Switch Theme:

Morale Check due to shooting and IC's  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Boom! Leman Russ Commander







An IC is in a unit, it gets all shot up except for the IC, does he have to take a Morale Test or does he instantly revert to IC status?

Rules support for this is where?

Thanks...

.Only a fool believes there is such a thing as price gouging. Things have value determined by the creator or merchant. If you don't agree with that value, you are free not to purchase. 
   
Made in ca
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Independent Characters start the game as single model units, and therefore do not take Last Man Standing tests (see "Last Man Standing", p.49, Rulebook). They still take a Morale test because they were part of a unit that sustained 25%+ casualties in a single shooting phase.
   
Made in sg
Executing Exarch





Nurglitch has nailed it. There was some controversy over it in the past, but it was pretty silly and I don't think we need to go over it again unless someone raises the issue.

Wehrkind wrote:Sounds like a lot, but with a little practice I can do ~7-8 girls in 2-3 hours. Probably less if the cat and wife didn't want attention in that time.
 
   
Made in us
Boom! Leman Russ Commander






tegeus-Cromis wrote:Nurglitch has nailed it. There was some controversy over it in the past, but it was pretty silly and I don't think we need to go over it again unless someone raises the issue.


I'm in agreement, but I need backing to win the arguement <g>

.Only a fool believes there is such a thing as price gouging. Things have value determined by the creator or merchant. If you don't agree with that value, you are free not to purchase. 
   
Made in ca
Decrepit Dakkanaut





So go over the rules for Independent Characters with your friend, and cross-reference them against the Morale rules.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/05/21 22:23:34


 
   
Made in us
Heroic Senior Officer





Woodbridge, VA

Was he part of a squad at the beginning of the shooting phase? Yes.
Did that unit sustain 25% or more casualties? Yes.
Does a unit that has sustained 25% or more casualties have to take a Morale test? Yes.

Don "MONDO"
www.ironfistleague.com
Northern VA/Southern MD 
   
Made in us
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA

don_mondo wrote:Was he part of a squad at the beginning of the shooting phase? Yes.
Did that unit sustain 25% or more casualties? Yes.
Does a unit that has sustained 25% or more casualties have to take a Morale test? Yes.



And:


Can a character leave a unit outside of its own movement phase? No.



I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
   
Made in au
Longtime Dakkanaut






Brisbane/Australia

Good, Clear example(?)

1. SM Chapter Master with attached Comm. Squad. Takes 33% Casualties from shooting. Make Ld test or run like Grots.

2. SM Chaplin with attached Comm. Squad. Takes 33% Casualties from shooting. Seeing as the Chaplin passes on his 'Fearless' capabilities to the squad he is attached to, no Ld test required.

When part of a Unit, unless specifically stated that they are fearless, they still need to make a Ld test from 25% shooting casualties or more.


This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/05/23 05:36:12


"Dakkanaut" not "Dakkaite"
Only with Minatures, does size matter...
"Only the living collect a pension"Johannes VII
"If the ork codex and 5th were developed near the same time, any possible nerf will be pre-planned."-malfred
"I'd do it but the GW Website makes my eyes hurt. "Gwar
"That would be page 7 and a half. You find it by turning your rulebook on its side and slamming your head against it..." insaniak
MeanGreenStompa - The only chatbot I ever tried talking to insisted I take a stress pill and kept referring to me as Dave, despite my protestations.
insaniak "So, by 'serious question' you actually meant something entirely different? "
Frazzled[Mod] On Rule #1- No it literally means: be polite. If we wanted less work there would be no OT section.
Chowderhead - God no. If I said Pirates Honor, I would have had to kill him whether he won or lost. 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA

The last fun and related question in that family...

Does the unit have a -1 leadership penalty for being below 50%

I could see the argument that the unit is at 0% which is below half.

I could see the argument that the unit taking the test is at 100% (1 model)

but if you make the argument that the unit is not below half because he is a single model, that circles the first question of why he is taking the leadership test in the first place.

I'd accept either rule, but I'd love to hear the 'why'.

Please check out my current project blog

Feel free to PM me to talk about your list ideas....

The Sprue Posse Gaming Club 
   
Made in ca
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Yakface has suggested the answer to whether a unit whose remainder is an Independent Character tests on a -1 penalty for being below 50%: The Independent Character is still part of the unit until its next movement phase, and thus is numbered as part of that unit.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: