Question about Daemonic robes interpretation

Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:

No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.

If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

**shaselai**

I just want to get clarified on daemonic robes - it says the character can't be wounded on better than 3+. Does that mean if something thats would wound on 2+ doesn't wound him or it would wound on a 3+ instead of 2? thanks

**Negativemoney**

The second. In order to wound the Daemon you will not be able to wound him on anything lower than a 3+. This means that a 2 will always fail if the Strength of the attack is > T+1.

**Warboss Nidsplitta'**

Got a question to add on. If someone is attacking a character with Daemonic Robes with a weapon that auto-wounds, do they still auto-wound (count as getting those 3+'s) or do they have to roll to see if they wound on a 3+?

**BorderCountess**

Historically speaking, you would still need to roll a 3+.

**Warboss Nidsplitta'**

That's what i thought, but i'm looking for a page number to back it up, it's escaping me right now

**BorderCountess**

Check the FAQ's. If not there, then the answer may lie in Warhammer Chronicles 2004, as this question came up with similar attacks, specifically Runefangs against Steam Tanks (when the Tank didn't have a Toughness value).

I believe it also came up in another scenario, but I can't recall as I can't find my copy of the book.

**Warboss Nidsplitta'**

Alright, thanks