Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Think having both of them in one list is too much?

I like the idea of having them supporting lots of Daemonettes, Fiends, and Seekers.

While I haven't done the math, I'm pretty sure you could fit 6 squads of Daemonettes, 3 squads of Fiends, and 3 squads of Seekers and still have room for more.

Do you mean "cheese" standards or something?

Neither is that good to make someone cry cheese.

No, I meant are they too expensive points wise? Can you use them and still be able to get enough models on the table to be competitive?

40k tends to the maxim that the more bodies you have, the better the odds are you can correct mistakes.

If you are an excellent general, you can run small elite armies--and if you don't make any mistakes, you can win with them.

If you are new to the game, or only have experience with 2 or 3 armies...don't bother running herohammer armies in 40k. You won't do well.

Unless it's Abaddon. Man that guys tough. lol

Skarbrand/Fateweaver or Bloodthirster/Fateweaver does make for a pretty sick combo but their points cost is going to be prohibitive to say the least. A very good alternative is to run Bluescribes + Horrors/Skulltaker+chariot if you feel that having 1/3 of your army in 7 wounds isn't the best use of points.