Switch Theme:

Daemons assaulting grey knights: Difficult terrain test == Assault at Ini 1?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




So when daemons charge grey knights, they must "roll dice for their assault range as if they were moving in difficult ground"

Does that mean that since they made a difficult terrain test, they now strike at ini 1?

   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User




Yes (see p36, "if a unit etc.). I think most daemons will have some equivalent of frags, however, making the point moot.
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




Actually, most MC Daemons don't, and Daemonzilla is pretty common, and getting a chance to swing at them first regardless of terrain could potentially be a nice advantage with the number of str6 attacks Gks can produce.

Looking at the list, Stuff that doesn't have grenades standard:
All of Khorne (BTs, Skarbrand, Bloodletters, bloodcrushers, Fleshhounds
Some nurgle stuff, but they are all slow anyway.
All of the Tzeentch units ( though most aren't likely to charge anyway)

Soul Grinders don't
Daemon Princes of nurgle or slaanesh can get grenades for extra points.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/08/22 03:09:32


 
   
Made in us
Painlord Titan Princeps of Slaanesh






Dallas, TX

"as if they were"

Not the same as doing it. Models moving through diff. terrain have their I reduced. They aren't, so don't.

40k Armies I play:


Glory for Slaanesh!

 
   
Made in us
Incorporating Wet-Blending






Glendale, AZ

Spellbound wrote:"as if they were"

Not the same as doing it. Models moving through diff. terrain have their I reduced. They aren't, so don't.


BGB pg 36:
"....if an assaulting Unit had to take a difficult or dangerous terrain test during their assault move, all of it's models have their intitiative lowered to 1 when attacking, regardless of other intitiative modifiers."

I would definitely say yes, they strike at I1.

Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.


 
   
Made in us
Lone Wolf Sentinel Pilot





Vacaville, CA

Again... god forbid that daemonhunters have an advantage against daemons. This can't be right!

"Ideas are more powerful than guns. We would not let our enemies have guns, why should we let them have ideas."

-Joseph Stalin
 
   
Made in us
[DCM]
Tilter at Windmills






Manchester, NH

I agree with Lordhat, per the rule given. In 5th it's not really about whether the defenders are actually in cover, it's about whether the attackers had to roll difficult terrain (ie: were slowed in their approach) on the way in.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/08/27 18:30:31


Adepticon 2015: Team Tourney Best Imperial Team- Team Ironguts, Adepticon 2014: Team Tourney 6th/120, Best Imperial Team- Cold Steel Mercs 2, 40k Championship Qualifier ~25/226
More 2010-2014 GT/Major RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 78-20-9 // SW: 8-1-2 (Golden Ticket with SW), BA: 29-9-4 6th Ed GT & RTT Record (W/L/D) -- CSM: 36-12-2 // BA: 11-4-1 // SW: 1-1-1
DT:70S++++G(FAQ)M++B++I+Pw40k99#+D+++A+++/sWD105R+++T(T)DM+++++
A better way to score Sportsmanship in tournaments
The 40K Rulebook & Codex FAQs. You should have these bookmarked if you play this game.
The Dakka Dakka Forum Rules You agreed to abide by these when you signed up.

Maelstrom's Edge! 
   
Made in us
Deadly Dire Avenger





Aliso Viejo, CA - But wishing I was in Seattle

Mannahnin wrote:I agree with Lordhat, per the rule given. In 5th it's not really about whether the defenders are actually in cover, it's about whether the attackers had to roll difficult terrain (ie: were slowed in their approach) on the way in.


Yup, I think this is worded this way specifically due to the now "reaction move" of 6" after getting charged as this can and often will pull the defenders away from their cover. So the way the rules are worded now, this matters not. Just that the charger/assaulter had to make a diff terrain roll.

-Jara

 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: