Switch Theme:

Definition of Majority?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Human Auxiliary to the Empire




My Tau had a fun time stomping my Ork opponent last night, but a small rules question came up.

We had a mixed WS unit defending in assault, and the question of what the 'Majority' WS was arose.

In this particular case we had one unit at 4 WS, one at 3 WS and two at 2 WS.

We came up with three possible interpretations of the word 'majority':

1. The most-prevalent model. In this case the unit would have a 2 WS. Under this interpretation, if there was a fifth model at another WS (say we had one at 5, one at 4, one at 3, and two at 2) the 'majority' would still be a WS of 2. (Although if this is right the proper term would be 'plurality' not 'majority')

2. Majority is 50% or more. So in this case the WS would be 2.

3. Majority is more than 50%. So in this case the WS would be 4 (since if there is no majority you take the highest WS).

In the 'five model' case mentioned in option 1 the WS would be '5' in both options 2 and 3, since the two 2 WS models are 40% of the unit.

I could see arguments for any of these options, and couldn't find a definition of 'majority' in the 5E rules -- so what is 'usual and customary'?

Geoff
   
Made in us
Confessor Of Sins






Scranton

as far as I can tell. The rules for 5th ed give your opponent the best in cases where it is exactly 50%. soooo if its half WS 2 and half WS 3 use WS 3 by default

I am using the "cover saves" majority ruling to make the call here so I could be wrong... the rule book is on the other side of the room... and I am lazy today.

 
   
Made in us
Human Auxiliary to the Empire




Thanks - I agree that if you had two models at WS 2 and two at WS 3 then the unit would have WS 3 as a whole. But to clarify, the situation was that there were two models at WS 2, one at WS 3, and one at WS 4.

Geoff
   
Made in gb
Grumpy Longbeard






I'm working on instinct, but I'd suggest it's WS2, I don't think GW are quite as subtle with semantics to differentiate between plurality and majority.

Opinions are like arseholes. Everyone's got one and they all stink. 
   
Made in se
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout





If there is no majority Weapon Skill, use the highest Weapon Skill of the models engaged.

Majority means more than half, so for that unit the defensive WS would be 4.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/08/25 16:08:46


In one game turn an Imperial guardsman can move 6", kill a few guys with his flamer, assault 6", kill two more guys with his bayonet, flee 12", regroup when assaulted, react 6", kill one more guy with his bayonet and then flee another 12".
So in one game turn an Imperial guardsman can move 42" and kill more than 5 people. At the same time a Chimera at top speed on a road can move 18"... 
   
Made in ca
Long-Range Ultramarine Land Speeder Pilot






Generally most people around my area take the rule to mean whatever subset of WS the unit has more of. So in this case since we have WS subsets of 1, 1, and 2 the answer is whatever the WS of the subset of 2 models is. So again in your case it is WS 2.

You could have 10 firgures all having a different number for their WS and one more model that has the same as any one of them and that would cause you to use the WS of the two models that have the same number because that sub-set is the largest in the complete set.

DQ:80+S+++G+MB++I+Pw40k96#++D++A++/sWD-R++++T(T)DM+

Note: D+ can take over 12 hours of driving in Canada. It's no small task here.

GENERATION 5: The first time you see this, copy and paste it into your sig and add 1 to the number after generation. Consider it a social experiment.
 
   
Made in us
Xenohunter with First Contact





What Strimen is describing, however, is technically called a "plurality", ie, the largest number among three or more items.

A majority is a distinctly different thing than a plurality. The rule is based upon a majority- not a plurality.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/08/25 18:43:16


 
   
Made in us
Nasty Nob on Warbike with Klaw





St. Louis, MO

Majority is the one that has the MOST models of that particular aspect in the unit.

You're looking at a WS 2.

Eric

Black Fiend wrote: Okay all the ChapterHouse Nazis to the right!! All the GW apologists to the far left. LETS GET READY TO RUMBLE !!!
The Green Git wrote: I'd like to cross section them and see if they have TFG rings, but that's probably illegal.
Polonius wrote: You have to love when the most clearly biased person in the room is claiming to be objective.
Greebynog wrote:Us brits have a sense of fair play and propriety that you colonial savages can only dream of.
Stelek wrote: I know you're afraid. I want you to be. Because you should be. I've got the humiliation wagon all set up for you to take a ride back to suck city.
Quote: LunaHound--- Why do people hate unpainted models? I mean is it lacking the realism to what we fantasize the plastic soldier men to be?
I just can't stand it when people have fun the wrong way. - Chongara
I do believe that the GW "moneysheep" is a dying breed, despite their bleats to the contrary. - AesSedai
You are a thief and a predator of the wargaming community, and i'll be damned if anyone says differently ever again on my watch in these forums. -MajorTom11 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Eric, you are mistaken. As stated above you, a majority means more than half. You are referring to a plurality.
   
Made in us
Bounding Assault Marine





You had models with mixed WS and the same I? Very odd and probably rare case.

**EDIT**
The word 'majority' could be taken to mean both, especially if there are 3 types.... even more rare and odd.

I lean more towards 50%+ of the entire group, rather than most in a group.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/08/25 20:29:17


Please note - terms like 'always/never' are carried with the basic understanding that there are exceptions to the rule, and therefore are used to mean generally...




"I do not play people who blatently exploit the rules to their own benefit, in any game. It is disrespectful to the game designers and other players." 
   
Made in us
Bounding Assault Marine





Side note**

Isn't it ironic that they 'intend' on making combat faster by putting all this majority 'bull' in there... when in fact it takes more time simply deciding what majority means...

From what I gather here at my local groups we play literal WS and simply use different color dice (we are more than likely breaking the rules, but hey... I just play for fun)


Please note - terms like 'always/never' are carried with the basic understanding that there are exceptions to the rule, and therefore are used to mean generally...




"I do not play people who blatently exploit the rules to their own benefit, in any game. It is disrespectful to the game designers and other players." 
   
Made in us
Human Auxiliary to the Empire




Harkainos wrote:You had models with mixed WS and the same I? Very odd and probably rare case.

**EDIT**
The word 'majority' could be taken to mean both, especially if there are 3 types.... even more rare and odd.

I lean more towards 50%+ of the entire group, rather than most in a group.


We were defending, so initiative didn't come into play. All models defend at the same time (which also eliminates the 'different colored dice' idea). For attacking it's clear what you're supposed to do -- apply each attack at it's WS.

FWIW, the group was a a Crisis Shas'O (WS 4), a bodyguard (WS 3) and two shield drones (WS 2)

Glad to see from the varied responses that we were not alone in our confusion. In the end, since the Tau were winning, we decided to treat it as WS 2 and move on. But I was curious if this was something that others had faced...

Geoff

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2008/08/25 21:23:23


 
   
Made in jp
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer






Somewhere in south-central England.

In such a small group of figures, I personally would roll the dice individually.

I'm writing a load of fiction. My latest story starts here... This is the index of all the stories...

We're not very big on official rules. Rules lead to people looking for loopholes. What's here is about it. 
   
Made in us
Human Auxiliary to the Empire




Kilkrazy wrote:In such a small group of figures, I personally would roll the dice individually.


How do you roll the dice individually? I was defending, and the attacker can't predesignate attacks. Unless I'm missing something here, the attacker needs to roll against a single WS.

Geoff
   
Made in jp
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer






Somewhere in south-central England.

I would let them predesignate.

If you have four attackers, they can each attack one model. Or eight attackers can attack two each.

All the stuff about averaging is to allow fights between 30 Boyz and 20 IG happen quickly. It is a different situation with only four target models, having three different stat lines.

I'm writing a load of fiction. My latest story starts here... This is the index of all the stories...

We're not very big on official rules. Rules lead to people looking for loopholes. What's here is about it. 
   
Made in jp
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer






Somewhere in south-central England.

I'm not saying this it tournament legal, it's just the way I would play it.

I'm writing a load of fiction. My latest story starts here... This is the index of all the stories...

We're not very big on official rules. Rules lead to people looking for loopholes. What's here is about it. 
   
Made in us
Bounding Assault Marine





If you 'defend' at the same time and have diff WS I would have used diff colored dice to clarify what hit not who was hit.

Please note - terms like 'always/never' are carried with the basic understanding that there are exceptions to the rule, and therefore are used to mean generally...




"I do not play people who blatently exploit the rules to their own benefit, in any game. It is disrespectful to the game designers and other players." 
   
Made in ca
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Or you could play by the rules.

When you have four models engaged, one with WS4, one with WS3, and two with WS2 there is no majority, since a majority is:

i. the number larger than half the total,

ii. a number of voters or votes, jurors, or others in agreement, constituting more than half of the total number,

iii. the amount by which the greater number, as of votes, surpasses the remainder (distinguished from plurality)

The rules clearly indicate what is to be done in the absence of a majority: use the highest WS of the unit's engaged models. In this case, WS4.

Given that it hasn't been mentioned, I think it's important to note that the WS of defending units is determined by the relative number of engaged models, not the total number of models in the unit.
   
Made in us
Bounding Assault Marine





amazing it took 12 posts to get someone to go to dictionary.com to actually look up majority.

Now we all know how it must be played.

Please note - terms like 'always/never' are carried with the basic understanding that there are exceptions to the rule, and therefore are used to mean generally...




"I do not play people who blatently exploit the rules to their own benefit, in any game. It is disrespectful to the game designers and other players." 
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User




Actually, the correct reading was in the first post; the poster just didn't want to believe that "majority" meant "majority." Also, the correct reading was listed in the 5th post, so it didn't take 12 posts to arrive at the answer.
   
Made in us
Human Auxiliary to the Empire




JCarter wrote:Actually, the correct reading was in the first post; the poster just didn't want to believe that "majority" meant "majority." Also, the correct reading was listed in the 5th post, so it didn't take 12 posts to arrive at the answer.


I appreciate everyone's input. FWIW, my interpretation was that majority needed to be more than 50% (which seems to be the consensus). So I thought that 'majority' meant 'majority'. But I've played lots of games and have seen the word 'majority' not used or interpreted by the strict definition (as can be seen above). So I figured it was worth asking, since I'm relatively new to 40K and how specific words may be defined.

Geoff
   
Made in au
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






I agree that "majority" means exactly that - more than 50%. In the example situation, there's no majority so the highest is used.

Otherwise there would be some rather strange situations: a unit with two WS2 models, one WS7 model, one WS8 model, one WS9 model and one WS10 model would be hit on WS2 if "plurality" was intended.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Strange can happen both ways

4 WS2 4 WS3 1WS6

No majority, so they use WS6.

It is a rule meant to speed things up, and that will 'make sense' most of the time. Occasionally you get weirdness....
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: