| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2008/08/29 04:20:28
Subject: CC against vehicles
|
|
Killer Klaivex
|
In the rule book it states that AP- weapons can only score glancing hits. Does this include close combat attacks that do not ignore armour? And does it mean that power weapons (including lightning claws etc), can score penetrating hits?
|
People are like dice, a certain Frenchman said that. You throw yourself in the direction of your own choosing. People are free because they can do that. Everyone's circumstances are different, but no matter how small the choice, at the very least, you can throw yourself. It's not chance or fate. It's the choice you made. |
|
|
 |
|
2008/08/29 04:22:17
Subject: CC against vehicles
|
|
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Close combat weapons are not classified as 'AP -' and therefore do not suffer from the rule associated with it.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2008/08/29 04:22:29
|
|
|
|
|
2008/08/29 10:41:14
Subject: CC against vehicles
|
|
Killer Klaivex
|
Well
Technically they could be since they allow armour saves.
|
People are like dice, a certain Frenchman said that. You throw yourself in the direction of your own choosing. People are free because they can do that. Everyone's circumstances are different, but no matter how small the choice, at the very least, you can throw yourself. It's not chance or fate. It's the choice you made. |
|
|
|
|
2008/08/29 10:52:36
Subject: CC against vehicles
|
|
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Cheese Elemental wrote:Well
Technically they could be since they allow armour saves.
No, they couldn't.
' AP -' is a defined characteristic that some weapons have.
Close combat weapons do not have ' AP -' in their profile and are therefore not ' AP -' weapons.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008/08/29 18:57:56
Subject: Re:CC against vehicles
|
|
Morphing Obliterator
|
only ranged weapons have an AP value. if you can find a CC weapon with an AP value ill give you a cookie.
|
taking up the mission
Polonius wrote:Well, seeing as I literally will die if I ever lose a game of 40k, I find your approach almost heretical. If we were to play each other in a tournament, not only would I table you, I would murder you, your family, every woman you ever loved and burn down your house. I mean, what's the point in winning if you allow people that don't take the game seriously to live?
|
|
|
|
|
2008/08/29 19:11:17
Subject: CC against vehicles
|
|
Long-Range Ultramarine Land Speeder Pilot
Whitebear lake Minnesota.
|
mmmmmm cookies...
|
2500-3000pts
1500pts
750pts 
2500pts  Bretonnians |
|
|
|
|
|
|
