Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I wish I could justify D since that's definitely the intent, but I play it as A because that's how it's written now.

I agree with the others who've said that a unit being in cover doesn't affect someone else charging that unit, so I can't agree with C. And the language of the extra examples sounds to me like clarifications rather than additional rules, so I can't agree with B.

Yeah, that's what I meant - the rules were written in the old edition so the units would strike first, so I take that as the intent. That just seems very clear cut to me.