Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 01:33:22
Subject: Fateweaver vs. Nullzone or Nullzone vs. Fortune is cover a invulnerable save?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Chicago, Illinois
|
How does this work? It states in the rules that nullzone makes it so that enemy models must reroll invulnerable saves .
I shoot at a unit of bloodletter by Fateweaver; I have nullzone he has Fatweaver.
fateweaver with in range nullzone up.
Scenario 1
1 . I put 8 wounds on a Bloodletter unit.
They roll 8 dice; 4 Saves, 4 Fails;
2. Oppenent picks up 4 Failed Dice rerolls them because of Fateweaver
Oppenent picks up 4 successful dice because of Fateweaver.
3. He has rerolled each dice once which is the number of times the book allows as the rules state you may not reroll the dice more than once. Is this the correct way of doing it.
Or Scenario 2
1. He picks up failed dice rerolls them ; gets 7 saves now.
2. He picks up all successful saves rerolls due to Nullzone
3. This doesnt seem to make sense as it violates the no more than one reroll rule
Now there has not be multiple rerolls of the dice as that is not allowed by the rules. But Each dice has only been rerolled once. So is this how this works.
Okay; Nullzone states reroll invulnerable saves , under Cover it states it is a invulnerable unmodifieable save.
So does nullzone work with cover saves since it states that cover is a type of invulnerable save.
|
If I lose it is because I had bad luck, if you win it is because you cheated. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 01:49:55
Subject: Fateweaver vs. Nullzone or Nullzone vs. Fortune is cover a invulnerable save?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
First, a "Cover" save is NOT an "Invulnerable" save.
Second, you can never reroll a die more than once.
Fateweaver/Fortune allow you to reroll failed saves. Null zone forces you to reroll successful saves. As such, the correct way to do it is to roll the saves, and then immediately reroll all of them, regardless of the results. (You may be able to agree with your opponent to allow the two effects to cancel, so that the dice only have to be rolled once, just to save time.)
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/01/29 01:51:37
Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 02:04:11
Subject: Fateweaver vs. Nullzone or Nullzone vs. Fortune is cover a invulnerable save?
|
 |
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout
|
It's the same with the farseer power Fortune.
The first roll becomes redundant so you can just skip it.
|
In one game turn an Imperial guardsman can move 6", kill a few guys with his flamer, assault 6", kill two more guys with his bayonet, flee 12", regroup when assaulted, react 6", kill one more guy with his bayonet and then flee another 12".
So in one game turn an Imperial guardsman can move 42" and kill more than 5 people. At the same time a Chimera at top speed on a road can move 18"... |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 02:21:04
Subject: Fateweaver vs. Nullzone or Nullzone vs. Fortune is cover a invulnerable save?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Chicago, Illinois
|
Which is it though?
You have make 4 saves , 4 are failed.
You reroll the 4 saves , you reroll the 4 Failed and that is what is left. CorrecT?
|
If I lose it is because I had bad luck, if you win it is because you cheated. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 03:31:33
Subject: Fateweaver vs. Nullzone or Nullzone vs. Fortune is cover a invulnerable save?
|
 |
[ARTICLE MOD]
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
The correct way is to pick up all the dice (passed and failed) and re-roll them at once.
Note that a cover save is NOT an invulnerable save.
|
"I was not making fun of you personally - I was heaping scorn on an inexcusably silly idea - a practice I shall always follow." - Lt. Colonel Dubois, Starship Troopers
Don't settle for the pewter horde! Visit http://www.bkarmypainting.com and find out how you can have a well-painted army quickly at a reasonable price. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 07:19:03
Subject: Fateweaver vs. Nullzone or Nullzone vs. Fortune is cover a invulnerable save?
|
 |
Frenzied Juggernaut
|
but still rerollable by fateweaver
|
qwekel wants to get bigger, please click on him and level him up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 11:28:22
Subject: Fateweaver vs. Nullzone or Nullzone vs. Fortune is cover a invulnerable save?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
Chicago, Illinois
|
Yeah I would have to read the specific entry, but it does say that Cover Saves are a type of inbulnerable save and uses the wording.
If someone could preint the entry that would be great.
|
If I lose it is because I had bad luck, if you win it is because you cheated. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 11:56:31
Subject: Fateweaver vs. Nullzone or Nullzone vs. Fortune is cover a invulnerable save?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
A cover save is not an invulnerable save. For example flamer templates ignore cover.
G
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 16:59:59
Subject: Fateweaver vs. Nullzone or Nullzone vs. Fortune is cover a invulnerable save?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
Hollismason wrote:Yeah I would have to read the specific entry, but it does say that Cover Saves are a type of inbulnerable save and uses the wording. No, it doesn't. See pages 20-21, where "Armour Saves," "Invulnerable Saves," and "Cover Saves" each have their own headings and description. Then see pg. 24, under "Models with more than one save."
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/01/29 17:01:52
Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/01/29 17:06:38
Subject: Fateweaver vs. Nullzone or Nullzone vs. Fortune is cover a invulnerable save?
|
 |
Frenzied Juggernaut
|
Hollismason wrote:Yeah I would have to read the specific entry, but it does say that Cover Saves are a type of inbulnerable save and uses the wording.
If someone could preint the entry that would be great.
inbulnerable.
EDIT: nice try though
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/01/29 17:07:02
qwekel wants to get bigger, please click on him and level him up.
|
|
 |
 |
|