Switch Theme:

Different Tournament layouts  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Excited Doom Diver





Firstly, I personally would not feel entirely happy loaning my army to who-knows-who for however long. I would if I trusted everyone there, but it would just be too easy for one random model to... go missing.

Secondly, I've never played with Tau, Necrons, or Dark Eldar. I'm sure that even finding out what everything does would take a fairly silly amount of time, let alone using it tactically.

And finally, what's to stop someone deliberately entering a really, really bad army, on the basis it probably won't hurt him, and even if it does it'll hurt others in the tournament by exactly the same margin?

EDIT: This came across pretty negatively. Amongst friends, I like the idea, especially if it's tweaked to ensure that the various drawbacks are minimised - a display board with a slot for every model solves no. 1, and always using your own list for the final game solves no. 3. No. 2 probably isn't a concern for most tournament players. But you wanted to know the drawbacks, so...

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/02/08 20:54:16


 
 
Forum Index » 40K Proposed Rules
Go to: