| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/12 06:00:51
Subject: complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Tinkering Tech-Priest
|
I have always like small games of 40k
so I have came up with a "small game" based campaign
- 350 pts
- must have transporter (if army has one)
- may not be more than 20 models
- doesn't have to be from the same army (keep this reasonable no csm and marines but imperials with imperials csm with deamons is fine.)
- do-not need to have entire unit like you could just take an apothecary
- do not need unit coherency
- when a character is killed you loose it for the rest of campaign unless you buy it back
- when you kill an enemy character you get the points cost of the character to spend
that is my campaign I was wondering what every one thought of it.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/02/13 04:49:11
armored company 18/2/3
3/1/8
5/1/12
3/0/5
3/0/2 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/13 01:21:07
Subject: complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Tinkering Tech-Priest
|
no one ever answers me :(
|
armored company 18/2/3
3/1/8
5/1/12
3/0/5
3/0/2 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/13 06:33:56
Subject: complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Frightening Flamer of Tzeentch
in Canada
|
Interesting concept. But let me get this straight. In your description you stated that you must have a transport. Just wondering why?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/14 02:29:21
Subject: complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Tinkering Tech-Priest
|
to account for the fluff of moving around and makes you have to account for tanks
|
armored company 18/2/3
3/1/8
5/1/12
3/0/5
3/0/2 |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/26 19:09:38
Subject: Re:complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Elite Tyranid Warrior
|
It sounds kind of like Chaos Warbands. I would recommend a slightly higher point count, since there is permanent death, and limit them to one army to avoid ending up with complex, multi-codex armies that will make it harder to coordinate such small games.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/03/11 09:21:45
Subject: Re:complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Pewling Menial
Toronto, Canada. My spirit will never die
|
character - the ones in the books, ICs, or any model?
Nids have no characters, and only one IC (Broodlord), yet a ballance tyrant could be very good at IC hunting.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/03/23 12:03:53
Subject: complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Annoyed Blood Angel Devastator
UK, godalming
|
i really like that idea actually
maybe have 400-500 points and up to 25-30 models
|
SM blood ravens (2000)
orks (1000)
tyranids (2000)
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/09 08:00:00
Subject: complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Space Marine Scout with Sniper Rifle
Moscow Russia
|
kudos. This is the EXACT idea I was looking for! The one teensy detail I would change is put the troop count up to 25 and the points limit to 400.
|
Nofasse 'Eadhunta wrote:
And what's the deal with all those rivets in people's armor? Is it like in the grim darkness of the far future there is no welding?
Nerf_IG wrote:
Every time my commander takes a wound I cut myself.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/22 15:43:27
Subject: complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
|
For your little campaign, I suggest you read the old rule of "40K in 40Min." They were little rule/restriction for building small army (400pts) but keeping it playable/balanced.
it was something like this:
400pts.
You must take one Troop choice.
You may take a maximum of One HQ choice.
You may spend remaining points from any part of the codex.
No character or beast may have more than two wounds.
No Special Characters.
No 2+ saves.
No vehicles with a total Armour Value greater than 33.
(Front Side and Rear added together.)
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/09/22 19:19:10
Subject: complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
A 20 model limit might be harsher for horde armies...maybe look at adapting those Kill Team rules?
I like the idea though as smaller games have a totally different feel. You'd almost be approaching a Necromunda and Inquisitor level with such armies.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/05 23:57:28
Subject: complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
One Canoptek Scarab in a Swarm
|
'Crons can't play in this list, as they have 1 transport, they don't make allies, and mono's kind of a ghetto transpo to begin with.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/14 17:27:04
Subject: Re:complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Skillful Swordsman
Hengelo, The Netherlands
|
I'd say a limit of 350 points and the requirement of a transport gives enough of a limit to the number of models and still accomodate races with cheap troops (like guard, and orcs). Otherwise these forces will be full of elite troops. For Necrons, an exception could be made, maybe they always "deep strike"?
350 points is exactly 20 space marines and a rhino, is it?
|
Herohammer was invented by players on a budget |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/11/15 15:36:49
Subject: complex small 40k campaign
|
 |
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot
Phoenix, Arizona
|
Daemons can't play... no transports at all. Of course they actually do always deep strike...
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|