Poll |
 |
|
 |
Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 01:31:56
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Nasty Nob on a Boar
|
Just putting it out there. I've seen some very nice painted/played mech armies out there. Which one(s) do you like best?
Other suggestions?
I didn't include Rhino Rush/LR Spam/Tau lists as the armies listed are all movement based in their fluff as well as army choices.
Any I missed?
Edit: Due to unforseen changes (and the witchblade at my back), I have changed a few of the choices!
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2009/02/18 16:41:47
No madam, 40,000 is the year that this game is set in. Not how much it costs. Though you may have a point. - GW Fulchester
The Gatling Guns have flamethrowers on them because this is 40k - DOW III
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 01:42:27
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Unhealthy Competition With Other Legions
Lost Carcosa
|
I went with Speed Freaks just cause red ones go faster. That whole concept as well as most anything Ork is hilarious.
|
Standing in the light, I see only darkness. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 01:43:29
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Serious Squig Herder
|
Orks
Orks
Orks
Orks
Orks
Orks
Orks
Orks
Orks
I simply had to childishly spam that.
|
blarg |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 01:44:33
Subject: Re:Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Nasty Nob on a Boar
|
And don't forget:
"Speed Kills!" - Ravenwing
|
No madam, 40,000 is the year that this game is set in. Not how much it costs. Though you may have a point. - GW Fulchester
The Gatling Guns have flamethrowers on them because this is 40k - DOW III
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 01:44:43
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Avatar of the Bloody-Handed God
|
Definately Speed Freaks or Saimhan.
The rest are mobile yes but they dont really emphasize on speed.
Speed Freak because red goes faster is so funny but cool.
Saimhan because wow... Sword Wind. sounds even cooler :"D
|
Paused
◙▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
◂◂ ► ▐ ▌ ◼ ▸▸
ʳʷ ᵖˡᵃʸ ᵖᵃᵘˢᵉ ˢᵗᵒᵖ ᶠᶠ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 01:45:40
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Dominar
|
Just out of curiosity, why is Armored Company up there? If you're moving more than 6", you can't fire any guns. It's actually ideal for AC vehicles to not move at all, utilizing their long range and multitude of heavy weapons.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 01:47:46
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Serious Squig Herder
|
Yeah, Armored Company would be more of a General Mechanized force then a Fast Mechanized force.
|
blarg |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 01:49:24
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Horrific Hive Tyrant
London (work) / Pompey (live, from time to time)
|
speed freaks all the way
great chances for conversions, amusing, and effective.
|
Suffused with the dying memories of Sanguinus, the warriors of the Death Company seek only one thing: death in battle fighting against the enemies of the Emperor. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 04:18:05
Subject: Re:Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
"But why doz da red onez go fasta?"
"Because we finks de do, dats why."
The justification that ork stuff works because they think it does may be the single greatest piece of 40K background writing ever. And speed freaks lets us indulge all of our Mad Max inspired imaginations.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 04:27:15
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Why no Dark eldar?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 04:42:24
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
|
Yeah, the spiky space elfs are a lot faster than the sit back and blast AC.
I voted for Ravenwing, because I like DA fluff.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 05:05:27
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Rampaging Carnifex
|
I'm pretty sure that "Sword Wind" is the formation the Biel Tan Eldar use, not Saim Han.
Also seconding Dark Eldar. Yeah, the models suck, but they are hella fast and pack a ludicrous amount of firepower.
|
Dakka. You need more of it. No exceptions.
You ask me for an evil hamburger. I hand you a raccoon.-Captain Gordino
What are you talking about? They're Space Marines, which are heroic. They need to be able to do all the heroic stuff. They fight aliens and don't afraid of anything. -Orkeosarus
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 05:34:34
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
Getting my broom incase there is shenanigans.
|
Night Lords!
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 16:19:57
Subject: Re:Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Nasty Nob on a Boar
|
Few new choices. It's multiple choice, so there's no wrong answer (except for Whitescars).
Thanks!
|
No madam, 40,000 is the year that this game is set in. Not how much it costs. Though you may have a point. - GW Fulchester
The Gatling Guns have flamethrowers on them because this is 40k - DOW III
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 17:12:47
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
[DCM]
The Main Man
|
What do you mean Space Marines aren't movement based, based on fluff and army choices?
They're a highly mobile strike force, with lots of APCs, bikes, land speeders, jump packs, teleportation, etc.
If they don't qualify as "movement based," I don't know what does.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 21:06:59
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Mutilatin' Mad Dok
|
Will it count as spamming if I crack a redundant joke on licking your miniatures?
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/02/18 21:24:05
Subject: Which Fast Army Has More Flavor?
|
 |
Nasty Nob on a Boar
|
Hordini wrote:What do you mean Space Marines aren't movement based, based on fluff and army choices?
They're a highly mobile strike force, with lots of APCs, bikes, land speeders, jump packs, teleportation, etc.
If they don't qualify as "movement based," I don't know what does.
I think with the army choices that are given, it's pretty biased towards a certain fluff and movement. You can make your own poll about which SM Army makes the best use out of it's MSF choices.
And I don't like white scars = personal preference. I do like Ghengis Khan and Mongol Hordes though.
|
No madam, 40,000 is the year that this game is set in. Not how much it costs. Though you may have a point. - GW Fulchester
The Gatling Guns have flamethrowers on them because this is 40k - DOW III
|
|
 |
 |
|