Switch Theme:

Are GW IP rules a little extreme (example sited)  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Grovelin' Grot Rigger





East End, Near Witney, UK

Clthomps wrote:How about this:

CONVERSIONS

Conversions are a major aspect of the hobby, although in intellectual property terms, they also constitute a major infringement. However, we are certainly not about to stop people making cool conversions of our products, although, there are certain things to keep in mind:

* Please do not combine our intellectual properties with IP owned by any third parties.



So they are telling me that if I buy a Basilisk and then buy a Howetzer model from the local model shop I can not switch the guns without breaking their IP. That is total bull gak, if I spend my hard earned money on something I should have the right to do what I want to it. If I want to hit it with a sledge hammer then glue the pieces on a Cabbage Patch Kid, that should be my business.


But who owns the IP on a WW2 (or even current) howitzer? No one i think you'll find... so it would be ok.
 
Forum Index » Dakka Discussions
Go to: