Switch Theme:

What Constitutes as the Hull?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Hardened Veteran Guardsman



Phoenix

A regular and I always get into disputes when we play about what the hull is exactly.

he claims that if I shoot a blast marker weapon at a vehicle, that I need to place the hole of the template right in the very damn middle of the vehicle model.

I always thought that the hull of any vehicle was anything that constitutes as a 'wall' of sorts, usually consisting of the armor plating. Things like weapons, dozer blades and extra paraphernalia do not constitute as the hull, but the hull is essentially the box, or base, that the tank occupies. So this would imply that I have a fair amount of liberty on where I can place the marker.

Can anyone clarify exactly what the hull is?
   
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







The Hull is exactly that, the Hull of the vehicle.

With the exception of Drop pods (the amount of headaches they cause is unreal) anywhere on the vehicle that isnt a gun barrel or extra dodad constitutes as the hull. You can put the Blast marker on any part of the hull, though why you would not want to put it in the centre is beyond me, since the facing is still worked out from the sight of the firer if it hits, and its half strength if the hole isn't on it so its kinda useless anyway.

Edit: just double checked the rulebook. Page 60 is where you'll find where it says you can put it over any part of the hull

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2009/03/06 07:54:50


Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!)
 
   
Made in us
Hardened Veteran Guardsman



Phoenix

Perhaps its not the vehicle that I want to be hitting?

   
Made in gb
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime







AffliKtion wrote:Perhaps its not the vehicle that I want to be hitting?


Then why in gods name are you aiming at it ;p

Only reason I can think of is shooting say, a plasma cannon at a rhino that has just disgorged a unit of Marines in a nice tight bunch, you shoot at the rhino, putting the hole over the rear and clipping the Marines also.

Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!)
 
   
Made in us
Hardened Veteran Guardsman



Phoenix

Exactly. Hitting the Disembarked units is more important to me that destroying the rhino. I do this with Mortars alot and I have damn good luck when rolling hits so the Barrage shots scatter into the unit or is a direct hit on the transport. TLOS might also block ML/GL shots from getting to the unit because the damn vehicle is blocking the way, so why not just shoot the vehicle close to the unit?
   
Made in us
[ADMIN]
Decrepit Dakkanaut






Los Angeles, CA


See the diagram on page 3 of the rulebook for a little bit of clarity regarding the subject. Although the diagram features and Ork Trukk with a little imagination you can figure out how it applies to most vehicles.


Yes, you are allowed to place a blast so that the center hole is near the edge of the vehicle's hull in an effort to also hit other models.

And yes, some people will always think that this is being cheesy, so you'll just have to put up with it if you play with someone like that.

Mentioning that they CHANGED this rule from 4th to 5th edition (in 4th edition you had to CENTER the blast over the vehicle) might help matters a bit.

Also remembering that if the center hole ends up over the vehicle but also hits other models that those other models will get a cover save from the vehicle also might help to cheer your opponent up a bit.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/03/06 10:04:18


I play (click on icons to see pics): DQ:70+S++G(FAQ)M++B-I++Pw40k92/f-D+++A+++/areWD104R+T(D)DM+++
yakface's 40K rule #1: Although the rules allow you to use modeling to your advantage, how badly do you need to win your toy soldier games?
yakface's 40K rule #2: Friends don't let friends start a MEQ army.
yakface's 40K rule #3: Codex does not ALWAYS trump the rulebook, so please don't say that!
Waaagh Dakka: click the banner to learn more! 
   
Made in us
Junior Officer with Laspistol






The eye of terror.

If you've still got a 4th ed rulebook, look it up again. It merely said you had to place the center of the blast marker over the hull of the vehicle, or base of the model you were firing at, it did not say it had to be centered.

Anyways, I don't see it as being cheesy... in fact, when I was playing my friend's IG army last week I even told him to shoot the blast at one of my rhinos instead of the squad that had just disembarked so he could get more hits on my dudes.

Why did the berzerker cross the road?
Gwar! wrote:Willydstyle has it correct
Gwar! wrote:Yup you're absolutely right

New to the game and can't win? Read this.

 
   
Made in us
Implacable Skitarii




yakface wrote:Also remembering that if the center hole ends up over the vehicle but also hits other models that those other models will get a cover save from the vehicle also might help to cheer your opponent up a bit.


Why would they get a cover save? Unless they were behind the vehicle I don't see any reason why they would get a save.
Even if it was a barrage where it counts as coming from the center is that cover?
   
Made in us
Incorporating Wet-Blending






Glendale, AZ

willydstyle wrote:If you've still got a 4th ed rulebook, look it up again. It merely said you had to place the center of the blast marker over the hull of the vehicle, or base of the model you were firing at, it did not say it had to be centered.



Actually it DID say the that the marker had to be centered, whcih they then FAQ'd to mean that the center hole had to be over the base/hull.

Mannahnin wrote:A lot of folks online (and in emails in other parts of life) use pretty mangled English. The idea is that it takes extra effort and time to write properly, and they’d rather save the time. If you can still be understood, what’s the harm? While most of the time a sloppy post CAN be understood, the use of proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling is generally seen as respectable and desirable on most forums. It demonstrates an effort made to be understood, and to make your post an easy and pleasant read. By making this effort, you can often elicit more positive responses from the community, and instantly mark yourself as someone worth talking to.
insaniak wrote: Every time someone threatens violence over the internet as a result of someone's hypothetical actions at the gaming table, the earth shakes infinitisemally in its orbit as millions of eyeballs behind millions of monitors all roll simultaneously.


 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: