Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Found this

http://www.wargamesempire.com/shop/article_6.3/Daemonhunters-Daemonhost.html?shop_param=cid%3D19%26aid%3D6.3%26

And if i am reading it right the Inquisition use's Daemons

I did a search on google but could not find an answer can somone confirm this for me

some Inquisitors employ the possessed to turn Chaos's strength against itself but the practice is frowned upon by most Inquisitors

Yeah, the Radical branch will use Daemonhosts, making sure to kill the host prior to full manifestation.

yup some even use demon weapons and such. Like stated before its thought to destroy the demons you need to use their stuff against them. WEIRDOS

KingCracker wrote: yup some even use demon weapons and such. Like stated before its thought to destroy the demons you need to use their stuff against them. WEIRDOS

I knew about the weapons, just never knew they used deamons

mussie76 wrote:

KingCracker wrote: yup some even use demon weapons and such. Like stated before its thought to destroy the demons you need to use their stuff against them. WEIRDOS

I knew about the weapons, just never knew they used deamons

As was posted, they use "daemonhosts", which are a human or host body holding what is usually a daemon prince or greater daemon, which the Inquisitor has beaten and managed to 'control'.

Inquisitors who use daemonhosts and daemon weapons are labeled Radicals (as opposed to Puritans). Usually, the Radicals who try to toe the line and use chaos against itself end up falling to chaos eventually (the eisenhorn books are a good source). So are the Inquisitor games (the gw specialist games) rulebooks. They have several sources which outline the different types of Inquisitors).

They don't, however, routinely use "lesser daemons" or daemons from the four powers, per se.

mussie76 wrote:Found this

http://www.wargamesempire.com/shop/article_6.3/Daemonhunters-Daemonhost.html?shop_param=cid%3D19%26aid%3D6.3%26

And if i am reading it right the Inquisition use's Daemons

I did a search on google but could not find an answer can somone confirm this for me

The Emperors Most Holy Inquisition has a long history of getting the job done “no matter what the cost”. While many inquisitors will argue that the ends justifies the means, there are certain levels to which they will not sink. There are, essentially, two types of inquisitor:

Puritan: The puritan inquisitor is generally a sliding scale that begins at fundamentalism – think Pat Robertson in power armor with a flame thrower – to those who’s interpretation of inquisitorial procedure is somewhat lax – Vic Mackey with exterminatus authority. Puritans generally adhere to three types of theory; Amalathian, Monodominance, and Thorianism. Definitions for which can be found here: http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/Inquisition

Radicals: These are the blokes who get in trouble for their breach of inquisitorial procedure and go off the deep end, using daemonhosts and prohibited xenos technonologies. It should be said, however, that there are as many levels of radicalism that do not necessarily imply that the inquisitor has become dangerous and a threat to the inquisition. In fact, many “radical” inquisitors begin their careers as strict puritans but as they continue to do their holy work they find that their methods must change to meet the need of their current crusade or mission. Famously, Gideon Ravenor employed Eldar tech to take psychic control of his agents while in the field (note: the use of Eldar tech could be considered a spiritual medium rather than tech but this is an argument for another thread). Even Gregor Eisenhorn bound the daemon Cherubael in one of his best friends and longest serving agent, Godwyn Fischig.

The use of daemons outright, such as the instance with the celebrated then reviled Inquisitor Quixos, led to his eventual censure by the Inquisition and he was thusly hunted down for centuries for his heresy – as was Eisenhorn for his “relationship” with Cherubael. Though Cherubael was a daemonhost for both inquisitors, a bound daemon in the “service” of these inquisitors, it was still to much for the Inquisition to stomach.

Could an inquisitor us a daemon? No. I don’t think a right thinking inquisitor would ever stoop to using a daemon for their purposes. A daemonhost? Yes, almost certainly I could see a inquisitor convincing themselves that such was the only way to complete a mission. However, doing so would most certainly doom them in the eyes of Inquisition and bring upon them the strongest censure possible.

Hope this helps.

Yes the Daemonhost counts as a Daemon and some of the Daemonhunter assassins are from Chaos.

IMHO, they could use Chaos weaponry, but anything other than some Daemonhosts is unacceptable.

phantommaster wrote:Yes the Daemonhost counts as a Daemon and some of the Daemonhunter assassins are from Chaos.

Death Cult Assassins aren't Chaos, they just worship the Empra in different ways than some, oh and Death Cults can also be used by the Ordo Hereticus.

The Inquisitors think that using Chaos against themselves is the best option. And the assassins actually use Necron C'tan weapons.