Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

This is pretty straight forward.



I don't want to hit the front armor! I would much rather hit the side armor with a 4+ cover save. That's allowed right? I'm in the side armor quadrant, I just can't see any part of the side armor at all.

Actually the extreme angle rule calls out for a 3+ cover save.

If you are in the side armour facing but can't see the side you can't shoot at the side armour. Your picture is crap but if I understand it (and you) correctly you have to hit the front armour and give away a 3+ cover save.

!!!!!!!!!!

If I understand you correctly, then the answer is No.

You might be in the side armour arch but you cannot see it. You can see the front armour though. Your shoots are then shot at the front armour with a 3+ coversave.

Even odder is the reverse case, where you can see the side armor but not the front, in which case you'll shoot at the side armor and give a 3+ cover save.

It's odd because a Predator obscured like this could be destroyed by an autocannon much easier than if it were not behind any wall in the first place.