Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/04 12:49:42
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Me and My father are in an arguement over the Space Marine Thunderfire cannon.( His) Actually, a few arguements.
A. He claims that it does not require LOS to fire at my units.
B. He claims that if he fires at a building my units are in or near, it will hit them too, without even aiming at my units. Aiming at the building.
C. That the thunderfire cannon can fire without the techmarine.
D. That his precious cannon can kill an entire army alone.
Could you all please help us decide these arguements? It woudl be very kind if you would. Thank you.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2009/05/04 14:38:39
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/04 13:10:57
Subject: Please help in an arguement.
|
 |
Confessor Of Sins
|
Rules for artillery are found on page 55 of the main rulebook. ABC are all false. D could be true - unlikely but possible.
A - both the gun and the crew needs LOS.
B - the gun must fire at a valid target, a unit with wounds or AV
C - laughter is in order.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/04 14:01:48
Subject: Please help in an arguement.
|
 |
Heroic Senior Officer
|
A. no
B. no
C. no
D. Yeah, right, I don't think so.
|
Don "MONDO"
www.ironfistleague.com
Northern VA/Southern MD |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/04 14:03:59
Subject: Please help in an arguement.
|
 |
Avatar of the Bloody-Handed God
|
Hes wrong on all accounts .
Please proceed to show his army your mighty foot of Gork.
|
Paused
◙▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
◂◂ ► ▐ ▌ ◼ ▸▸
ʳʷ ᵖˡᵃʸ ᵖᵃᵘˢᵉ ˢᵗᵒᵖ ᶠᶠ |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/04 15:54:18
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Enginseer with a Wrench
|
I love my Thunderfire Cannon as much as the next guy, but... Yeah. Wrong on all accounts. The rules for artillery (which is the type of unit the Thunderfire Cannon is) are on page 55, as stated previously by Spetulhu.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/04 19:33:25
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Wow, that's your father? Who knew TFG could be so close!
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/04 19:40:19
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Bounding Dark Angels Assault Marine
Terra
|
Before you tell your dad to go fly a grot bomb... make sure you got your allowance for the week!...
but seriously.. as all above have said...
1.NO
2.NO
3.NO
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/04 19:46:31
Subject: Re: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Student Curious About Xenos
|
i think that your dad should actually read the rule book
|
Dark Saints 1500 and growing
Rebel Grotz! 750 points- 8 of which are painted
Only The Strong Walk The Way Of The Converter
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/05 04:01:47
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Tough-as-Nails Ork Boy
|
Aren't there rules for destroying buildings? I know they have armor values and such, but I've never actually read at how they are shot/destroyed. Wouldn't it be possible that he could target the building, on the level the models are placed? Again I haven't read that whole section so I'm fairly certain its not feasable, but hey who knows.
|
A forum site set up for West Michigan players to share hobby ideas and organize games. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/05 04:38:15
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Ork-Hunting Inquisitorial Xenokiller
|
Ruins have no AV. Bunkers do.
|
Quote: Gwar - What Inquisitor said.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/05 04:40:33
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Stealthy Warhound Titan Princeps
Phoenix, AZ, USA
|
Buildings are treated the same way as vehicles, except that they have the same AV on all sides and that they are immoble all the time.
|
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/05 04:40:50
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
If you choose to use the rules for enclosed buldings they are pretty much just an immobile vehicle, meaning you shoot at / destroy them the same way you do a vehicle.
Just like a vehicle, you cannot target the models inside the building.
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/07 14:00:46
Subject: Re: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Fresh-Faced New User
|
Thanks everyone! Shut him up, and got him to really examine the rulebook again. Thanks alot. He had questions for you all, but I dont' remember what they were at the moment.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/07 14:27:50
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
He's probably confusing Blast weapons with Template weapons.
Template weapons (flamers, redeemer cannons, etc) can cause D6 hits to the unit inside if the template touches a fire point on the building.
Blast weapons (frag missiles, battle cannons, thunderfire cannons, etc.) do not share this property with template weapons.
|
Why did the berzerker cross the road?
Gwar! wrote:Willydstyle has it correct
Gwar! wrote:Yup you're absolutely right
New to the game and can't win? Read this.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/07 16:09:00
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Quick-fingered Warlord Moderatus
|
willydstyle wrote:He's probably confusing Blast weapons with Template weapons.
Template weapons (flamers, redeemer cannons, etc) can cause D6 hits to the unit inside if the template touches a fire point on the building.
Blast weapons (frag missiles, battle cannons, thunderfire cannons, etc.) do not share this property with template weapons.
Good spotting, if this is the case point out to him the things used for resolving blasts are never called templates in 5th and are instead "blast markers"
|
Interceptor Drones can disembark at any point during the Sun Shark's move (even though models cannot normally disembark from Zooming Flyers).
-Jeremy Vetock, only man at Games Workshop who understands Zooming Flyers |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/07 16:15:59
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Hanging Out with Russ until Wolftime
|
Drunkspleen wrote:willydstyle wrote:He's probably confusing Blast weapons with Template weapons.
Template weapons (flamers, redeemer cannons, etc) can cause D6 hits to the unit inside if the template touches a fire point on the building.
Blast weapons (frag missiles, battle cannons, thunderfire cannons, etc.) do not share this property with template weapons.
Good spotting, if this is the case point out to him the things used for resolving blasts are never called templates in 5th and are instead "blast markers"
But they WERE called Templates. Even the shining example of perfection like myself occasional still call them Blast templates
Disclaimer: Sarcasm up to 11 BTW.
|
Got 40k Rules Question? Send an e-mail to Gwar! for your Confidential Rules Queries.
Please do not PM me unless really necessary. I much prefer e-mail.
Need it Answered RIGHT NOW!? Ring me on Skype: "gwar.the.trolle"
Looking to play some Vassal? Ring me for a game!
Download The Unofficial FAQs by Gwar! here! (Dark Eldar Draft FAQ v1.0 released 04/Nov/2010! Download it before the Pandas eat it all!) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2009/05/08 07:56:48
Subject: Please help in an argument over SM Thunderfire Cannon
|
 |
Junior Officer with Laspistol
|
Gwar! wrote:Drunkspleen wrote:willydstyle wrote:He's probably confusing Blast weapons with Template weapons.
Template weapons (flamers, redeemer cannons, etc) can cause D6 hits to the unit inside if the template touches a fire point on the building.
Blast weapons (frag missiles, battle cannons, thunderfire cannons, etc.) do not share this property with template weapons.
Good spotting, if this is the case point out to him the things used for resolving blasts are never called templates in 5th and are instead "blast markers"
But they WERE called Templates. Even the shining example of perfection like myself occasional still call them Blast templates
Disclaimer: Sarcasm up to 11 BTW.
Well... technically they still are "templates" even though the game uses the term "template" and "marker" to separate them in game mechanics.
|
Why did the berzerker cross the road?
Gwar! wrote:Willydstyle has it correct
Gwar! wrote:Yup you're absolutely right
New to the game and can't win? Read this.
|
|
 |
 |
|